12.3 Model Selection and Validation

Multiple regression model selection balances complexity and performance to avoid overfitting or underfitting. Techniques like stepwise regression, best subset selection, and regularization help identify the optimal set of predictor variables for accurate and interpretable models.

Validation methods assess a model's performance on unseen data. Cross-validation, holdout validation, and repeated cross-validation provide estimates of generalization performance. Metrics like adjusted R-squared, RMSE, AIC, and BIC help compare models and evaluate their fit.

Model Selection and Validation in Multiple Regression

Process of model selection

Top images from around the web for Process of model selection

• 

  MR - Bootstrap aggregation for model selection in the model-free formalism View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Statistical Model Fitting and Model Selection in Pedestrian Dynamics Research | Collective Dynamics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Regresión lineal y, sub y sobre, ajuste View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  MR - Bootstrap aggregation for model selection in the model-free formalism View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Statistical Model Fitting and Model Selection in Pedestrian Dynamics Research | Collective Dynamics View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Process of model selection

• 

  MR - Bootstrap aggregation for model selection in the model-free formalism View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Statistical Model Fitting and Model Selection in Pedestrian Dynamics Research | Collective Dynamics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Regresión lineal y, sub y sobre, ajuste View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  MR - Bootstrap aggregation for model selection in the model-free formalism View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Statistical Model Fitting and Model Selection in Pedestrian Dynamics Research | Collective Dynamics View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Model selection identifies the best subset of predictor variables that explains the response variable
  • Balances model complexity and predictive performance to avoid overfitting (including too many variables) and underfitting (including too few variables)
  • Aims to create a parsimonious model that is both accurate and interpretable
• Common approaches to model selection include:
  • Stepwise regression methods (forward selection, backward elimination, and bidirectional elimination) iteratively add or remove variables based on their significance
  • Best subset selection evaluates all possible combinations of predictor variables to find the optimal subset
  • Regularization techniques (Ridge regression, Lasso regression, and Elastic Net) introduce penalties to shrink the coefficients of less important variables towards zero

Application of stepwise regression

• Forward selection starts with an empty model and iteratively adds the most significant predictor variable
  • Continues adding variables until no significant improvement in model fit is observed (based on p-values or information criteria)
  • May miss important combinations of variables and can be affected by multicollinearity
• Backward elimination starts with a full model containing all predictor variables and iteratively removes the least significant variable
  • Continues removing variables until no insignificant variables remain in the model (based on p-values or information criteria)
  • May retain unnecessary variables and can be computationally intensive for large datasets
• Bidirectional elimination (stepwise regression) combines forward selection and backward elimination
  • Allows for the addition and removal of variables at each step based on their significance
  • Continues until no further improvements can be made to the model's fit
  • Provides a balance between the advantages and disadvantages of forward selection and backward elimination

Metrics for regression fit

• Coefficient of determination ($R^2$) measures the proportion of variance in the response variable explained by the predictor variables
  • Ranges from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating better model fit ($R^2$ of 0.8 means 80% of the variance is explained by the model)
  • Can be misleading when comparing models with different numbers of predictor variables, as it always increases with more variables
• Adjusted $R^2$ adjusts $R^2$ for the number of predictor variables in the model
  • Penalizes the addition of unnecessary variables, preventing overfitting and providing a more reliable measure of model fit
  • Useful for comparing models with different numbers of predictor variables (a higher adjusted $R^2$ indicates a better balance between fit and complexity)
• Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) measures the average deviation between the predicted and actual values
  • Expressed in the same units as the response variable, making it easy to interpret
  • Lower values indicate better model fit (an RMSE of 5 means the average prediction error is 5 units)
• Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) assess model fit while penalizing model complexity
  • Lower values indicate a better balance between model fit and complexity (a model with a lower AIC or BIC is preferred)
  • BIC penalizes model complexity more heavily than AIC, favoring simpler models

Validation of regression models

• Cross-validation divides the dataset into k equally sized subsets (folds) and iteratively uses each fold as a validation set
  • Trains the model on the remaining folds and evaluates its performance on the validation fold
  • Averages the performance metrics (e.g., $R^2$, RMSE) across all iterations to estimate the model's generalization performance
  • Common choices for k include 5 or 10 folds (5-fold or 10-fold cross-validation)
• Holdout validation splits the dataset into separate training and validation sets
  • Trains the model on the training set (typically 70-80% of the data) and evaluates its performance on the validation set
  • Provides an unbiased estimate of the model's performance on unseen data
  • May not utilize all available data for training, potentially leading to suboptimal models
• Repeated cross-validation or bootstrapping repeats the cross-validation process multiple times with different random splits
  • Provides a more robust estimate of the model's performance and its variability across different subsets of the data
  • Reduces the impact of random sampling on the validation results
  • Computationally more intensive than a single round of cross-validation or holdout validation