Seismic inversion transforms seismic data into rock property descriptions, revealing subsurface details crucial for oil and gas exploration. It uses the link between seismic reflections and acoustic impedance to estimate properties like porosity and fluid content.
Advanced techniques, including machine learning, are pushing the boundaries of seismic inversion. These methods can handle complex geology, extract more information from data, and provide insights into reservoir characteristics that were previously hard to obtain.
Seismic Inversion for Subsurface Characterization
Fundamentals of Seismic Inversion
Top images from around the web for Fundamentals of Seismic Inversion SE - Pre-inversion normal fault geometry controls inversion style and magnitude, Farsund Basin ... View original
Is this image relevant?
SE - Pre-inversion normal fault geometry controls inversion style and magnitude, Farsund Basin ... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 1
Top images from around the web for Fundamentals of Seismic Inversion SE - Pre-inversion normal fault geometry controls inversion style and magnitude, Farsund Basin ... View original
Is this image relevant?
SE - Pre-inversion normal fault geometry controls inversion style and magnitude, Farsund Basin ... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 1
Seismic inversion transforms seismic reflection data into quantitative rock-property descriptions of reservoirs
Fundamental principle relies on the relationship between seismic reflections and acoustic impedance contrasts in the subsurface
Post-stack inversion methods (sparse-spike inversion, model-based inversion) estimate acoustic impedance using stacked seismic data
Pre-stack inversion techniques (AVO inversion) utilize angle-dependent reflectivity to estimate multiple elastic properties simultaneously
Deterministic inversion approaches assume a unique solution
Stochastic inversion methods incorporate uncertainty and generate multiple realizations
Advanced Techniques and Algorithms
Machine learning and artificial intelligence techniques apply to seismic inversion problems
Offer new possibilities for pattern recognition
Explore non-linear relationships between seismic data and rock properties
Choice of inversion algorithm depends on:
Available data (post-stack vs. pre-stack)
Geological complexity (simple layered structures vs. complex fault systems)
Desired output parameters (acoustic impedance, elastic properties, reservoir characteristics)
Examples of machine learning techniques in seismic inversion:
Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for facies classification
Support Vector Machines (SVMs) for lithology prediction
Random Forests for porosity estimation
Rock Properties Estimation with Seismic Inversion
Primary Rock Property Estimation
Acoustic impedance derived from seismic inversion infers:
Lithology (sandstone vs. shale)
Porosity (high impedance often indicates low porosity)
Fluid content (gas-filled pores typically show lower impedance than water-filled pores)
Elastic properties estimated using pre-stack inversion methods:
P-wave velocity (Vp)
S-wave velocity (Vs)
Density
Porosity estimation from inverted acoustic impedance requires:
Integration of well log data
Appropriate rock physics models (Wyllie's time-average equation, Raymer-Hunt-Gardner equation)
Advanced Property Estimation and Modeling
Fluid substitution modeling applies Gassmann's equations to inverted elastic properties
Predicts changes in seismic response due to different pore fluids (oil, gas, water)
Seismic attributes derived from inverted data characterize unconventional reservoirs:
Brittleness (ratio of Young's modulus to Poisson's ratio)
Fracture density (from azimuthal analysis of inverted properties)
Multi-attribute analysis and neural network approaches predict additional reservoir parameters:
Permeability (using relationships between porosity, clay content, and pore structure)
Water saturation (combining resistivity logs with inverted acoustic properties)
Time-lapse (4D) seismic inversion monitors changes in reservoir properties during production:
Identifies bypassed pay zones
Tracks fluid movement (water flood fronts, gas cap expansion)
Limitations of Seismic Inversion Results
Fundamental Limitations
Non-uniqueness presents a fundamental limitation of seismic inversion
Multiple subsurface models can produce the same seismic response
Requires additional constraints from well data or geological knowledge
Low-frequency component of the earth model (typically below 10 Hz) lacks constraint from seismic data
Requires additional information from well logs or geological models
Impacts the absolute values of inverted properties
Vertical resolution limits by the bandwidth of the seismic data
Thin layers below tuning thickness (typically 1/4 of the dominant wavelength) challenge to resolve
Affects the ability to detect and characterize thin reservoirs or stratigraphic features
Data Quality and External Factors
Noise in seismic data significantly impacts the quality and reliability of inversion results
Random noise (background fluctuations)
Coherent noise (multiples, acquisition footprint)
Anisotropy and attenuation effects, if not properly accounted for, lead to biased estimates of elastic properties and rock parameters
Vertical Transverse Isotropy (VTI) in shales
Horizontal Transverse Isotropy (HTI) in fractured reservoirs
Quality and distribution of well control influence:
Accuracy of the low-frequency model
Calibration of inversion results
Uncertainties in rock physics relationships and petrophysical interpretations propagate through the inversion process
Affect final estimates of reservoir properties
Require careful validation and sensitivity analysis
Seismic Inversion Interpretation for Applications
Reservoir Characterization and Modeling
Inverted acoustic impedance volumes delineate:
Stratigraphic features (channel systems, carbonate buildups)
Facies distributions (sand-shale transitions)
Potential hydrocarbon accumulations (low-impedance anomalies)
Integration of inverted elastic properties (Vp, Vs, density) enables:
Lithology discrimination (through Vp/Vs ratios)
Fluid discrimination (using elastic impedance crossplots)
Geobody extraction from inverted properties aids in:
Quantification of reservoir volumes
Identification of sweet spots in unconventional plays (areas of high porosity and hydrocarbon saturation)
Seismic inversion results provide high-resolution input for:
Geostatistical reservoir modeling
Property population in 3D geological models (porosity, permeability trends)
Production Optimization and Monitoring
Time-lapse seismic inversion results interpret to track:
Fluid movements (water encroachment, gas cap expansion)
Pressure changes (depletion zones, injection-induced pressure increases)
Compaction effects during reservoir production
Inverted properties and their derivatives optimize:
Well placement (targeting high-quality reservoir zones)
Horizontal well trajectories (staying within the most productive layers)
Infill drilling opportunities (identifying undrained compartments)
Seismic inversion results contribute to:
Reduction of uncertainty in reserves estimation
Economic evaluation of hydrocarbon prospects (by providing more accurate volume estimates)
Examples of production applications:
Monitoring CO2 injection for enhanced oil recovery
Identifying bypassed pay in mature fields
Optimizing hydraulic fracturing designs in shale reservoirs