Modern judicial interpretations refer to the way in which courts interpret and apply laws, statutes, and the Constitution to address current legal issues. These interpretations are shaped by contemporary social, political, and cultural contexts.
Related terms
Judicial Activism: This term refers to when judges interpret laws broadly or make new policy decisions from the bench.
Judicial Restraint: This term refers to when judges limit their role strictly to interpreting existing laws rather than making new ones.
Stare Decisis: This Latin term means "to stand by things decided." It is a principle that suggests courts should follow previous court decisions (precedents) when deciding similar cases.