In Schenck v United States(1919), the Supreme Court established the 'clear and present danger' test, stating that restrictions on free speech can be justified when there is a clear potential for immediate harm or danger. This case further shaped limitations on free speech during times of war or national security threats.
Related terms
Clear and Present Danger Test: The clear and present danger test determines whether restrictions on free speech are justified based on whether they present an immediate threat or danger.
Limitations on Free Speech: Limitations on free speech are restrictions imposed by the government to protect public safety or national security, even though they may restrict certain forms of expression.
National Security Threats: National security threats refer to potential dangers or risks that could harm a nation's security, such as terrorism or espionage.