ERA (Equal Rights Amendment)

Definition

The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) is a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution that would guarantee equal rights for all citizens regardless of sex. It was first proposed in 1923 and has been a central focus of the women's rights movement in the United States for decades, particularly in the context of the broader fight for women's rights.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. The ERA was first proposed in 1923 by Alice Paul and the National American Woman Suffrage Association, shortly after the ratification of the 19th Amendment which granted women the right to vote.
2. The ERA was passed by Congress in 1972 and sent to the states for ratification, but it fell short of the required 38 states needed for it to be added to the Constitution by the 1982 deadline.
3. Supporters of the ERA argued that it would provide a constitutional guarantee of equality for women, protecting them from discrimination in areas such as employment, education, and the military.
4. Opponents of the ERA argued that it would lead to the elimination of gender-specific protections for women, such as exemptions from military conscription and alimony payments.
5. The ERA remains an active issue, with ongoing efforts to revive the amendment and secure the necessary state ratifications.

Review Questions

• Explain the historical context and significance of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) in the broader fight for women's rights in the United States.
  • The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) was a proposed constitutional amendment that sought to guarantee equal rights for all citizens regardless of sex. It was first proposed in 1923, shortly after the ratification of the 19th Amendment which granted women the right to vote. The ERA was a central focus of the women's rights movement in the United States, as supporters argued that it would provide a constitutional guarantee of equality for women, protecting them from discrimination in areas such as employment, education, and the military. The ERA was passed by Congress in 1972 and sent to the states for ratification, but it fell short of the required 38 states needed for it to be added to the Constitution by the 1982 deadline. The ongoing efforts to revive the ERA and secure the necessary state ratifications demonstrate its continued significance in the broader fight for women's rights.
• Analyze the key arguments made by both supporters and opponents of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) and how these arguments shaped the debate surrounding its ratification.
  • Supporters of the ERA argued that it would provide a constitutional guarantee of equality for women, protecting them from discrimination in areas such as employment, education, and the military. They believed that the ERA would be a powerful tool in the fight for women's rights, ensuring that gender-based discrimination would be prohibited by the Constitution. Opponents of the ERA, on the other hand, argued that it would lead to the elimination of gender-specific protections for women, such as exemptions from military conscription and alimony payments. They also claimed that the ERA would undermine traditional gender roles and family structures. These competing arguments shaped the debate surrounding the ratification of the ERA, with supporters emphasizing the need for constitutional protection against discrimination and opponents raising concerns about the potential consequences of such a measure. The failure to secure the necessary state ratifications by the 1982 deadline demonstrates the divisive nature of this debate and the challenges in achieving consensus on the issue of women's rights.
• Evaluate the ongoing efforts to revive the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) and assess the potential impact it could have on the legal and social status of women in the United States if it were to be ratified.
  • Despite the failure to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) by the 1982 deadline, the issue has remained an active topic of discussion and advocacy. Supporters of the ERA continue to push for its revival, arguing that it is still needed to provide a constitutional guarantee of equality for women and protect them from discrimination. If the ERA were to be ratified, it could have a significant impact on the legal and social status of women in the United States. Proponents believe that it would strengthen legal protections against gender-based discrimination in areas such as employment, education, and the military, ensuring that women have the same rights and opportunities as men. Additionally, the ERA could have broader societal implications, challenging traditional gender roles and norms, and promoting greater gender equality and empowerment. However, opponents continue to raise concerns about the potential consequences of the ERA, such as the elimination of gender-specific protections and the disruption of traditional family structures. The ongoing debate surrounding the ERA highlights the complex and contentious nature of the issue of women's rights in the United States, and the challenges in achieving consensus on this important constitutional amendment.

Related terms

Women's Rights Movement: A social and political movement that seeks to establish and protect equal rights and legal protections for women.

Title IX: A federal civil rights law that prohibits sex-based discrimination in any educational program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.

Feminist Movement: A social and political movement that advocates for the rights, equality, and empowerment of women.