Banking model of education

Definition

The banking model of education is a term coined by Paulo Freire to describe a traditional approach to teaching where students are seen as passive recipients of knowledge, akin to bank accounts where information is deposited by the teacher. This model emphasizes rote memorization and the transmission of facts, which often leads to a lack of critical thinking and engagement among students. In contrast to more progressive educational approaches, it prioritizes a one-way flow of information from teacher to student, neglecting the importance of dialogue and collaborative learning.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. The banking model of education reinforces hierarchical relationships in the classroom, where the teacher holds all the power and authority over knowledge.
2. This model often results in students disengaging from the learning process, as they may view education merely as a requirement rather than an opportunity for personal growth.
3. Freire argues that the banking model dehumanizes students, as it reduces them to mere objects of education rather than active participants in their own learning.
4. Incorporating social justice issues into mathematics curriculum challenges the banking model by encouraging students to explore real-world problems and think critically about mathematical concepts.
5. Transitioning away from the banking model towards more participatory approaches can foster a more inclusive and empowering learning environment, particularly for marginalized communities.

Review Questions

• How does the banking model of education limit student engagement in the learning process?
  • The banking model of education limits student engagement by treating students as passive recipients of information rather than active participants. Since knowledge is simply deposited into students without encouraging them to question or interact with that information, they often become disengaged and see learning as a rote task. This lack of critical engagement prevents them from developing deeper understandings or applying their knowledge to real-world situations.
• Evaluate the implications of using the banking model of education when discussing social justice issues in mathematics curriculum.
  • Using the banking model when discussing social justice issues in mathematics can hinder students' ability to connect mathematical concepts to real-life situations that impact their communities. It reinforces a detached approach where students memorize formulas without understanding their applications in social contexts. This lack of relevance can perpetuate inequities by failing to empower students with the skills necessary to analyze and address social justice issues through mathematics.
• Synthesize how moving away from the banking model can enhance the mathematics curriculum to better address social justice issues.
  • Moving away from the banking model allows for an enriched mathematics curriculum that actively involves students in discussions around social justice issues. By adopting approaches like critical pedagogy and dialogic learning, educators can facilitate conversations that help students explore mathematical concepts within the context of societal challenges. This transformation not only fosters critical thinking but also empowers students to use mathematics as a tool for analyzing inequalities and proposing solutions within their communities.

Related terms

Critical Pedagogy: An educational philosophy that encourages students to question and challenge dominant social norms and injustices through dialogue and reflection.

Dialogic Learning: A form of learning that emphasizes conversation and interaction between students and teachers, promoting mutual understanding and knowledge co-creation.

Constructivist Learning: An educational theory that posits learners construct their own understanding and knowledge through experiences and reflection on those experiences.