4.2 Phonological Rules and Processes

Phonological rules and processes are the building blocks of a language's sound system. They govern how sounds change and interact in speech, shaping pronunciation patterns and word structures. These rules are crucial for understanding how languages evolve and differ from one another.

From assimilation to deletion, these processes explain why we say words the way we do. They're not just academic concepts – they're the hidden mechanisms behind our everyday speech. Understanding them helps us grasp the inner workings of language and how we communicate.

Phonological rules across languages

Assimilation and Dissimilation

Top images from around the web for Assimilation and Dissimilation

• 

  4.5 Phonological Derivations – Essentials of Linguistics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  vowels [linguisticsweb.org] View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  2.7 Classifying Vowels – Essentials of Linguistics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  4.5 Phonological Derivations – Essentials of Linguistics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  vowels [linguisticsweb.org] View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Assimilation and Dissimilation

• 

  4.5 Phonological Derivations – Essentials of Linguistics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  vowels [linguisticsweb.org] View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  2.7 Classifying Vowels – Essentials of Linguistics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  4.5 Phonological Derivations – Essentials of Linguistics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  vowels [linguisticsweb.org] View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Assimilation modifies sounds to become more similar to neighboring sounds
  • Occurs in terms of phonetic features (voicing, place of articulation, manner of articulation)
  • Example: In English, the prefix "in-" becomes "im-" before bilabial sounds (impossible, imbalance)
• Dissimilation creates contrast by making sounds less similar to neighbors
  • Increases phonetic distance between similar segments
  • Example: Latin "peregrinus" became "pilgrim" in English, changing one "r" to "l"
• Both processes affect consonants and vowels
  • Vowel harmony exemplifies assimilation across syllables
  • Dissimilation can occur with liquids, nasals, or other consonant classes

Deletion and Insertion

• Deletion removes sound segments from words in specific environments
  • Can affect vowels (syncope) or consonants (apocope, elision)
  • Example: "Chocolate" often pronounced as /ˈtʃɒklət/ in casual speech, omitting the middle vowel
• Insertion (epenthesis) adds sound segments to words
  • Breaks up consonant clusters or maintains syllable structure
  • Example: In Spanish, "espaΓ±ol" developed from Latin "hispanus" by adding initial "e-"
• Both processes often serve to simplify pronunciation or adhere to language-specific phonotactic constraints
  • Can occur word-initially, medially, or finally
  • May be influenced by stress patterns or morphological boundaries

Other Phonological Processes

• Metathesis transposes sounds or syllables within words
  • Occurs diachronically (over time) or synchronically (in current usage)
  • Example: Old English "thridda" became Modern English "third"
• Lenition weakens consonants in specific contexts
  • Often occurs intervocalically or word-finally
  • Example: Spanish "lado" (side) from Latin "latus", where "t" weakened to "d"
• Fortition strengthens consonants, typically in word-initial positions
  • Can involve changes in manner or place of articulation
  • Example: In some dialects of Spanish, word-initial "b" strengthens from a fricative to a stop
• Vowel harmony creates agreement in vowel features within words
  • Affects features like height, backness, or roundness
  • Example: Turkish suffixes change vowels to match the stem (ev-ler "houses" vs. kitap-lar "books")

Applying phonological rules

Formalization and Ordering

• Phonological rules formalize sound changes in specific environments
  • Use symbols and notation to represent changes concisely
  • Example: Voicing assimilation rule: [-voice] → [+voice] / _ [+voice]
• Rule ordering crucial for applying multiple phonological rules
  • Output of one rule serves as input for subsequent rules
  • Example: In English plural formation, voicing assimilation must apply before s-insertion
• Distinctive features in rule formulation describe sound changes precisely
  • Allows for specification of natural classes of sounds affected
  • Example: [+continuant] → [-continuant] / # _ (describes initial fricative strengthening)

Theoretical Frameworks

• Autosegmental phonology represents non-linear phonological processes
  • Useful for analyzing tone and vowel harmony
  • Example: Representing tone as a separate tier from segments in tonal languages
• Optimality Theory offers constraint-based approach to phonology
  • Focuses on ranking constraints rather than rule application
  • Example: Analyzing syllable structure through interaction of faithfulness and markedness constraints
• Both frameworks provide tools for analyzing complex phonological phenomena
  • Allow for more nuanced descriptions of cross-linguistic patterns
  • Help explain seemingly contradictory processes within a single language

Applications and Alternations

• Phonological rules account for allophonic variations
  • Describe predictable pronunciations of phonemes in different contexts
  • Example: Aspiration of voiceless stops in English (pin [pʰɪn] vs. spin [spɪn])
• Morphophonemic alternations explained through rule application
  • Address sound changes at morpheme boundaries
  • Example: The English past tense suffix alternations (/t/, /d/, /ɪd/) based on the final sound of the verb stem
• Productivity of rules varies within and across languages
  • Some rules apply broadly, others limited to specific lexical items or morphological classes
  • Example: English velar softening (electric/electricity) applies to some but not all words

Phonological rules: Shaping sound systems

Phonotactic Constraints and Contrast

• Phonological rules contribute to language-specific phonotactic constraints
  • Determine permissible sound sequences within syllables and words
  • Example: English prohibits word-initial /ŋ/, while this is allowed in Vietnamese
• Rules play crucial role in maintaining phonemic contrast
  • Help preserve distinctions between similar sounds in a language
  • Example: Vowel lengthening before voiced consonants in English maintains contrast (bit vs. bid)
• Interaction of multiple rules can lead to opacity
  • Motivation for sound changes obscured by subsequent processes
  • Example: Canadian Raising interacting with flapping in North American English dialects

Historical Development and Acquisition

• Diachronic sound changes often originate as synchronic phonological rules
  • Rules become fossilized over time, leading to permanent changes
  • Example: Great Vowel Shift in English began as a series of phonological rules
• Phonological rule acquisition essential in language development
  • Influences pronunciation patterns in first and second language learners
  • Example: Children acquiring English often apply rules like final devoicing before mastering adult forms
• Productivity of rules can change over time
  • Some rules become less active or restricted to certain word classes
  • Example: Velar softening in English no longer applies productively to new words

Interaction with Morphology

• Phonological rules interact with morphological processes
  • Lead to complex alternation patterns in inflection and derivation
  • Example: German final devoicing interacts with plural formation (Tag [tak] "day", Tage [taːgə] "days")
• Rules can be sensitive to morphological structure
  • Different rules may apply to stems, affixes, or compounds
  • Example: Stress assignment rules in English differ for nouns and verbs (record (n.) vs. record (v.))
• Morphophonological processes blur the line between phonology and morphology
  • Can result in suppletive forms or complex ablaut patterns
  • Example: English strong verbs (sing, sang, sung) show vowel alternations triggered by tense morphology

Phonological processes: Comparison across languages

Typological Variations

• Cross-linguistic studies reveal universal tendencies and language-specific variations
  • Some processes (assimilation, deletion) common across languages
  • Others (click consonants, ejectives) limited to certain language families
• Syllable structure and phonotactics influence types of phonological processes
  • Languages with complex syllable structures often have more reduction processes
  • Example: Japanese has strict (C)V syllable structure, leading to vowel epenthesis in loanwords
• Stress and intonation patterns vary, leading to diverse prosodic rules
  • Stress-timed vs. syllable-timed languages have different rhythmic properties
  • Example: English reduces vowels in unstressed syllables, while Spanish maintains vowel quality

Tonal and Segmental Processes

• Tonal languages employ unique phonological processes
  • Tone sandhi and other tonal phenomena not found in non-tonal languages
  • Example: Mandarin Chinese third tone sandhi changes a sequence of two third tones to second + third
• Presence or absence of certain phonemes affects nature and prevalence of processes
  • Languages lacking certain contrasts may have different allophonic rules
  • Example: Korean neutralizes the distinction between plain and tense consonants word-finally
• Consonant and vowel inventories influence types of phonological alternations
  • Languages with large inventories may have more place assimilation rules
  • Example: Arabic emphatic consonants trigger emphasis spreading to adjacent segments

Language Types and Historical Relationships

• Phonological processes in polysynthetic languages often differ from analytic languages
  • Complex morphological structures lead to intricate phonological interactions
  • Example: Inuktitut has complex consonant cluster simplification rules at morpheme boundaries
• Isolating languages may rely more on tonal or suprasegmental processes
  • Lack of affixation leads to different strategies for marking grammatical distinctions
  • Example: Vietnamese uses tone changes to indicate grammatical relationships
• Historical relationships between languages traced through shared processes
  • Sound changes and phonological rules can indicate genetic relationships
  • Example: Grimm's Law describes systematic consonant shifts from Proto-Indo-European to Germanic languages
• Areal features can lead to shared phonological processes among unrelated languages
  • Language contact results in borrowed sounds and phonological patterns
  • Example: Balkan Sprachbund languages share features like mid central vowel phonemes despite different origins