Speech acts and conversational implicature are key concepts in pragmatics. They show how we use language to do things beyond just sharing info. These ideas help us understand the hidden meanings and intentions behind what people say.
Understanding speech acts and implicature is crucial for effective communication. They reveal how context, shared knowledge, and cultural norms shape our conversations. This knowledge is useful in everyday life and in fields like linguistics and AI.
Speech Act Types
Components of Speech Acts
Top images from around the web for Components of Speech Acts Introduction to Language | Boundless Psychology View original
Is this image relevant?
Diagrams of taxonomy of speech acts View original
Is this image relevant?
Diagrams of taxonomy of speech acts View original
Is this image relevant?
Introduction to Language | Boundless Psychology View original
Is this image relevant?
Diagrams of taxonomy of speech acts View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Components of Speech Acts Introduction to Language | Boundless Psychology View original
Is this image relevant?
Diagrams of taxonomy of speech acts View original
Is this image relevant?
Diagrams of taxonomy of speech acts View original
Is this image relevant?
Introduction to Language | Boundless Psychology View original
Is this image relevant?
Diagrams of taxonomy of speech acts View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Speech act theory developed by J.L. Austin postulates language performs actions beyond conveying information
Locutionary acts encompass literal meaning of utterances including phonetic, syntactic, and semantic elements
Illocutionary acts embody intended meaning or force behind utterances (promising, requesting, warning)
Perlocutionary acts produce actual effects on listeners (persuading, frightening, inspiring)
Hierarchical relationship exists among three acts
Locutionary acts form foundation
Illocutionary acts build upon locutionary acts
Perlocutionary acts result from interaction of previous two
Indirect Speech Acts and Felicity Conditions
Indirect speech acts occur when illocutionary force differs from apparent surface structure
Require pragmatic interpretation to understand true meaning
Success of speech acts depends on meeting felicity conditions
Preparatory conditions (speaker has authority to perform act)
Sincerity conditions (speaker genuinely intends to carry out act)
Essential conditions (utterance changes social reality in some way)
Conversational Implicature
Types and Calculation of Implicatures
Conversational implicature introduced by H.P. Grice conveys implicit meaning beyond literal interpretation
Two main types of implicatures
Conventional implicatures tied to specific words or phrases
Conversational implicatures arise from context of conversation
Conversational implicatures further divided into
Generalized implicatures (occur in most contexts)
Particularized implicatures (specific to particular context)
Calculation of implicatures involves inference process based on
Literal meaning of utterance
Context of conversation
Assumed cooperation between interlocutors
Role and Significance of Implicatures
Implicatures facilitate efficient communication
Allow speakers to convey complex ideas concisely and indirectly
Enable communication of more information than explicitly stated
Rely on shared knowledge and contextual cues for interpretation
Essential in fields of study
Pragmatics
Discourse analysis
Cross-cultural communication
Gricean Maxims for Cooperation
The Cooperative Principle and Maxims
Cooperative Principle proposed by H.P. Grice
Participants expected to contribute appropriately to achieve accepted purpose of interaction
Four maxims elaborate on Cooperative Principle
Quantity: Provide neither more nor less information than required
Quality: Make contribution true and avoid saying things lacking adequate evidence
Relevance (Relation): Ensure contributions pertain to ongoing conversation and its goals
Manner: Be clear, orderly, and avoid ambiguity or obscurity in expressions
Violations of maxims can be intentional (leading to implicatures) or unintentional (potentially causing miscommunication)
Applications and Criticisms
Maxims serve as guidelines for effective communication
Not always strictly followed in real conversations
Lead to various pragmatic phenomena when flouted or violated
Critics argue maxims may not be universally applicable
Vary across cultures and communication contexts
May not account for all nuances of human communication
Context in Speech Interpretation
Contextual Factors in Communication
Context encompasses physical, social, cultural, and linguistic environment of communication
Common ground or shared knowledge between interlocutors crucial for interpreting intended meanings
Contextual factors influencing interpretation
Speaker-listener relationship
Setting of conversation
Prior discourse
Cultural norms and expectations
Cultural context vital in speech act interpretation
Different cultures have varying norms for politeness, directness, and appropriate speech acts
Theoretical Developments and Applications
Principle of relevance proposed by Sperber and Wilson
Hearers automatically seek most relevant interpretation of utterance given context
Context can override literal meaning
Allows successful communication even when utterances appear to violate Gricean maxims
Study of context in speech act theory and implicature led to developments in pragmatics
Relevance Theory
Neo-Gricean approaches
Applications in various fields
Cross-cultural communication
Natural language processing
Artificial intelligence