10.3 Military Involvement in Internal Security and Drug Wars

The military's role in Latin American politics has expanded beyond traditional defense, now encompassing internal security and drug wars. This shift blurs the line between military and police duties, driven by weak civilian police forces and powerful criminal organizations threatening state authority.

U.S. influence has fueled this trend through programs like Plan Colombia, providing billions in military aid. However, these militarized approaches have shown limited success in curbing the drug trade and often result in human rights abuses, weakening civilian control and the rule of law.

Military Involvement in Internal Security

Expansion of Military Role in Crime-Fighting and Counter-Narcotics

Top images from around the web for Expansion of Military Role in Crime-Fighting and Counter-Narcotics

• 

  United States invasion of Panama - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Drug cartel - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  USS Pinckney (DDG 91) conducts enhanced counter narcotics … | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  United States invasion of Panama - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Drug cartel - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Expansion of Military Role in Crime-Fighting and Counter-Narcotics

• 

  United States invasion of Panama - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Drug cartel - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  USS Pinckney (DDG 91) conducts enhanced counter narcotics … | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  United States invasion of Panama - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Drug cartel - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Many Latin American countries have seen a significant expansion of military involvement in internal security and counter-narcotics operations since the 1980s, blurring traditional lines between military and policing roles
• The perceived failure or corruption of civilian police forces has led governments to deploy the military for crime-fighting and public security duties
• Powerful criminal organizations pose a major threat to state authority in some countries, leading political leaders to rely on the superior firepower and resources of the military
• The post-Cold War context has seen Latin American militaries seeking new missions to justify their budgets and relevance, with internal security and counter-narcotics emerging as key areas of engagement

U.S. Promotion of Militarized Anti-Drug Efforts

• The U.S. government has actively promoted the militarization of anti-drug efforts in Latin America through training, equipment, and funding, exemplified by Plan Colombia
  • Plan Colombia involved billions of dollars in U.S. military aid to combat drug trafficking and leftist guerrillas
  • The U.S. has provided extensive military training to Latin American forces, often focusing on counter-narcotics tactics
  • U.S.-supplied equipment has included helicopters, weapons, and surveillance technology to bolster military anti-drug operations

Effectiveness of Militarized Approaches

Limited Success in Reducing Drug Trade

• Evidence suggests that militarized strategies have had limited success in reducing drug production, trafficking, or consumption in the long term, with the drug trade often adapting and relocating in response to crackdowns
  • Despite massive eradication efforts, coca cultivation has persisted in the Andean region, often shifting to new areas
  • Interdiction efforts have led to the emergence of new trafficking routes and methods, such as the use of submersibles
  • Demand for drugs in consumer countries has remained relatively stable, despite supply-side enforcement measures

Negative Consequences of Militarized Strategies

• Militarized anti-drug campaigns have often been accompanied by human rights abuses, including extrajudicial killings, torture, and forced displacement of civilian populations
• The deployment of troops for policing tasks can undermine efforts to professionalize and reform civilian police institutions and reinforce patterns of impunity
• Heavy-handed military tactics can alienate local communities and damage the legitimacy of the state, potentially fueling support for criminal groups or insurgent movements
• The focus on militarized enforcement has often come at the expense of addressing the underlying socioeconomic and institutional drivers of the drug trade and organized crime

Impact of Military Participation on Human Rights

Human Rights Violations and Excessive Force

• The use of military forces in policing roles has frequently led to human rights violations, as troops often lack proper training in civilian law enforcement and may be prone to using excessive force
  • Military personnel have been implicated in extrajudicial killings, torture, and disappearances in the context of anti-drug operations (Colombia, Mexico)
  • The use of military tactics, such as raids and airstrikes, has resulted in civilian casualties and the displacement of communities

Weakening of Civilian Control and Rule of Law

• Military involvement in internal security can weaken civilian control over the armed forces and create a climate of impunity, as military personnel are often shielded from accountability for abuses
• The blurring of military and police roles can undermine the rule of law and due process, as suspects may be subjected to military jurisdiction or detained without proper legal safeguards
• The reliance on the military for internal security can divert resources and attention away from efforts to reform and strengthen civilian police institutions, which are crucial for long-term public safety and the consolidation of democracy

Disproportionate Impact on Marginalized Communities

• In some cases, militarized policing has targeted marginalized communities, such as indigenous groups or urban poor, exacerbating social inequalities and fueling grievances
  • In Mexico, military operations against drug cartels have often focused on poor rural areas, leading to allegations of abuses against civilians
  • In Brazil, military police have been accused of using excessive force and discriminatory practices in favelas (low-income neighborhoods)

Military Role in Non-Traditional Threats

Arguments for Military Involvement

• Some argue that the military, as the most well-equipped and disciplined force, is best suited to tackle powerful criminal organizations that outmatch the capabilities of civilian police
  • Criminal groups in Latin America often possess sophisticated weaponry and vast resources, challenging the capacity of police forces
  • The military's intelligence capabilities and logistical support are seen as crucial assets in combating organized crime

Critiques of Military Involvement

• Others contend that the use of the military for internal security is a misallocation of resources and a distraction from the military's core mission of external defense
• Critics warn that the militarization of public security can lead to the normalization of a "state of exception" and the erosion of civil liberties and democratic governance
  • The use of military courts to try civilians accused of drug crimes has raised concerns about due process and human rights
  • Militarized policing can create a climate of fear and intimidation, stifling political dissent and social movements

Debates on Appropriate Security Strategies

• Proponents of police reform argue that the long-term solution to crime and violence lies in building professional, accountable, and rights-respecting civilian police forces, not in relying on the military
  • Investment in police training, anti-corruption measures, and community policing strategies are seen as more sustainable approaches
• The debate raises broader questions about the nature of security threats in the contemporary era and the appropriate balance between military, police, and other state institutions in addressing them
  • The rise of transnational criminal networks and the blurring of lines between organized crime and insurgency pose complex challenges for security policy
  • Effective responses may require a comprehensive approach that combines targeted law enforcement, social programs, and international cooperation