7.1 Evolution of Party Systems in Latin America

Latin American party systems have evolved dramatically since the 19th century. From elite-based parties focused on centralism vs. federalism, they've transformed into diverse systems reflecting broader societal interests. This evolution mirrors the region's political and economic changes.

Today's Latin American parties range from institutionalized two-party systems to fragmented multi-party landscapes. Ideological orientations vary widely, from socialist Cuba to conservative Colombia. These differences shape each country's political competition and policy directions.

Political Parties in Latin America

Evolution of Political Parties from the 19th Century to the Present

Top images from around the web for Evolution of Political Parties from the 19th Century to the Present

• 

  The Shape of Modern Political Parties | American Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Nature of Public Opinion – American Government (2e) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Mental Origins and the Evolution of Political Order View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Shape of Modern Political Parties | American Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Nature of Public Opinion – American Government (2e) View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Evolution of Political Parties from the 19th Century to the Present

• 

  The Shape of Modern Political Parties | American Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Nature of Public Opinion – American Government (2e) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Mental Origins and the Evolution of Political Order View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Shape of Modern Political Parties | American Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Nature of Public Opinion – American Government (2e) View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• In the 19th century, political parties in Latin America were primarily elite-based and focused on issues of centralism versus federalism (centralized vs decentralized power) and conservatism versus liberalism (traditional values vs progressive reforms)
• The early 20th century saw the emergence of mass-based parties, such as the Radical Civic Union in Argentina and the Revolutionary Institutional Party (PRI) in Mexico, which aimed to mobilize broader segments of society by appealing to the working class and middle class
• The rise of populist parties in the mid-20th century, such as the Peronist Party in Argentina and the Democratic Action party in Venezuela, emphasized nationalism, social welfare, and economic development through state intervention and redistribution of wealth
• The 1960s and 1970s witnessed the growth of leftist parties, including socialist and communist parties, which advocated for radical social and economic reforms such as land redistribution, nationalization of industries, and workers' rights
• The period of military dictatorships in the 1970s and 1980s led to the suppression of political parties and the emergence of resistance movements that fought against authoritarianism and human rights abuses
• The transition to democracy in the 1980s and 1990s resulted in the resurgence of political parties and the development of more diverse and competitive party systems, with the inclusion of previously marginalized groups such as indigenous peoples and Afro-descendants
• The early 21st century has seen the rise of new political movements and parties, such as the Workers' Party in Brazil and the Movement for Socialism in Bolivia, which challenge traditional party structures and ideologies by emphasizing participatory democracy, social justice, and anti-neoliberalism

Influence of Social Movements and Civil Society on Political Parties

• Social movements and civil society organizations have played a significant role in shaping the agendas and strategies of political parties in Latin America
• In some countries, such as Bolivia and Brazil, parties have close ties to social movements and incorporate their demands into their platforms, such as the recognition of indigenous rights and the expansion of social programs
• In other countries, such as Mexico and Peru, parties are more distant from social movements and civil society organizations, which often criticize them for being unresponsive to the needs of marginalized groups
• The relationship between parties and social movements has also been shaped by the legacy of authoritarianism and the struggle for democratization, with some parties emerging from resistance movements and others co-opting or repressing them
• The influence of social movements on political parties has varied over time, with some periods of intense mobilization and others of demobilization and fragmentation
• The rise of new social movements, such as the feminist and environmental movements, has challenged political parties to address new issues and incorporate new actors into their structures and decision-making processes

Critical Junctures and Party Systems

Impact of Democratization on Party Systems

• Democratization processes in Latin America have often led to the fragmentation of existing party systems and the emergence of new parties that represent previously marginalized groups
  • For example, the transition to democracy in Brazil in the 1980s led to the rise of the Workers' Party, which represented the interests of the urban working class and social movements
  • Similarly, the end of the military dictatorship in Chile in 1990 led to the emergence of new parties, such as the Party for Democracy and the Socialist Party, which had been banned or suppressed during the authoritarian period
• Democratization has also led to the realignment of party systems, with some parties adapting to the new political context and others disappearing or merging with other parties
  • For instance, in Mexico, the PRI, which had dominated the political system for decades, lost its hegemony in the 2000 elections and had to compete with new parties such as the National Action Party and the Party of the Democratic Revolution
• The process of democratization has not been linear or homogeneous across Latin American countries, with some experiencing more gradual and stable transitions and others facing more abrupt and conflictive ones
  • In some cases, such as Venezuela and Nicaragua, the democratization process has been reversed or eroded by the rise of authoritarian or populist leaders who have concentrated power and undermined democratic institutions
• The consolidation of democracy in Latin America has also been challenged by issues such as corruption, violence, and social inequality, which have undermined the legitimacy and effectiveness of political parties and institutions

Effects of Economic Crises on Party Systems

• Economic crises, such as the debt crisis of the 1980s and the neoliberal reforms of the 1990s, have also had a significant impact on party systems in Latin America
  • These crises have often led to the collapse of traditional parties and the emergence of new parties that criticize the existing economic model and propose alternative policies
  • The economic crisis in Argentina in the early 2000s, for instance, led to the rise of the Kirchnerist faction within the Peronist Party, which advocated for a more state-interventionist economic model and the rejection of IMF-imposed austerity measures
• Economic crises have also led to the polarization of party systems, with some parties defending the neoliberal model and others proposing more statist or populist alternatives
  • In Venezuela, for example, the economic crisis of the late 1990s led to the rise of Hugo Chávez and the Fifth Republic Movement, which challenged the two-party system that had dominated the country since the 1960s and proposed a "Bolivarian revolution" based on socialism and anti-imperialism
• The commodity boom of the early 21st century and the subsequent economic downturn have also shaped party systems in Latin America
  • The boom period led to the strengthening of left-wing parties that advocated for the redistribution of resource rents, such as the Movement for Socialism in Bolivia and the Citizen Revolution in Ecuador
  • The downturn, on the other hand, has led to the resurgence of right-wing parties that emphasize fiscal discipline and market-oriented policies, such as the Democratic Center party in Colombia and the Social Christian Party in Ecuador
• Economic crises have also had an impact on the social bases of support for political parties, with some groups benefiting from the economic model and others being marginalized or excluded
  • In Brazil, for instance, the economic policies of the Workers' Party governments in the 2000s and 2010s led to the expansion of the middle class and the reduction of poverty, but also to the displacement of traditional working-class constituencies and the rise of conservative movements that opposed the party's agenda

Party Systems: Comparisons Across Latin America

Variation in the Number and Institutionalization of Parties

• The number of parties and the level of party system institutionalization vary significantly across Latin American countries
  • Some countries, such as Uruguay and Chile, have relatively stable and institutionalized party systems with a small number of parties that have deep roots in society and clear programmatic platforms
    • Uruguay, for example, has a two-party system dominated by the Colorado Party and the National Party, which have alternated in power since the early 20th century and have strong links to social and economic interest groups
  • Other countries, such as Brazil and Peru, have more fragmented and volatile party systems with a large number of parties that have weak social bases and unclear ideological positions
    • Brazil, for instance, has a highly fragmented party system with over 30 registered parties, many of which are based on regional or personal interests rather than programmatic agendas
• The level of party system institutionalization is influenced by factors such as the historical legacy of the country, the electoral system, and the degree of social and economic development
  • Countries with a longer history of democratic stability and a more developed civil society tend to have more institutionalized party systems, while countries with a history of authoritarianism and social conflict tend to have more fragmented and personalistic party systems
• The institutionalization of party systems has important implications for the quality of democracy and the effectiveness of policymaking
  • Institutionalized party systems tend to provide more stable and predictable governance, as well as more effective representation of social interests and accountability of political leaders
  • Fragmented and personalistic party systems, on the other hand, tend to generate more political instability, clientelism, and corruption, as well as less coherent and responsive policymaking

Diversity in Ideological Orientations of Parties

• The ideological orientation of parties also differs across countries
  • Some countries, such as Cuba and Venezuela, have been dominated by socialist or left-wing parties that advocate for state intervention in the economy, social welfare policies, and anti-imperialism
    • Cuba, for example, has been ruled by the Communist Party since the 1959 revolution, which has implemented a centrally planned economy and a one-party political system
  • Other countries, such as Colombia and Paraguay, have been dominated by conservative or right-wing parties that defend free-market policies, traditional values, and a strong military
    • Colombia, for instance, has a long history of two-party rule by the Liberal Party and the Conservative Party, which have supported a market-oriented economic model and a hardline approach to the country's armed conflict
• The ideological orientation of parties is influenced by factors such as the country's economic structure, social cleavages, and international context
  • Countries with a more industrialized economy and a larger working class tend to have stronger left-wing parties, while countries with a more agricultural economy and a stronger landed elite tend to have stronger right-wing parties
  • Countries with deep ethnic or regional cleavages tend to have parties that represent those divisions, while countries with a more homogeneous population tend to have parties that cut across those lines
• The ideological orientation of parties has important implications for the nature of political competition and the direction of public policies
  • Countries with a more polarized party system tend to have more ideological and confrontational politics, while countries with a more centrist party system tend to have more pragmatic and consensual politics
  • The ideological orientation of the governing party or coalition can have a significant impact on the country's economic and social policies, as well as its foreign policy and international alignments