16.1 Ethical Frameworks for Communication

Ethical frameworks provide the foundation for making moral decisions in leadership communication. From utilitarianism to virtue ethics, these approaches offer different lenses for evaluating right and wrong. Understanding these frameworks helps leaders navigate complex ethical dilemmas.

Professional ethics build on these frameworks, establishing codes of conduct for specific fields. These guidelines aim to maintain integrity and public trust. While codes provide structure, leaders must still exercise personal judgment when facing nuanced ethical challenges in their communication.

Ethical Frameworks

Utilitarianism and Consequentialism

Top images from around the web for Utilitarianism and Consequentialism

• 

  Rational Decision Making vs. Other Types of Decision Making | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Utilitarianism – Ethics and Society View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | How Ethical Leadership Shapes Employees’ Readiness to Change: The Mediating Role of ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Rational Decision Making vs. Other Types of Decision Making | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Utilitarianism – Ethics and Society View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Utilitarianism and Consequentialism

• 

  Rational Decision Making vs. Other Types of Decision Making | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Utilitarianism – Ethics and Society View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | How Ethical Leadership Shapes Employees’ Readiness to Change: The Mediating Role of ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Rational Decision Making vs. Other Types of Decision Making | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Utilitarianism – Ethics and Society View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Utilitarianism holds that the most ethical action is the one that maximizes overall happiness or well-being for the greatest number of people
• Focuses on the consequences of actions rather than the intentions behind them
• Considers both short-term and long-term effects of decisions (policy making)
• Challenges include difficulty quantifying happiness, potential for minority groups to be overlooked, and justifying means to achieve desired ends (trolley problem)
• Consequentialism more broadly judges the morality of an action based on its consequences
• Encompasses various theories that share the common principle of evaluating actions by their outcomes (utilitarianism, egoism, altruism)

Deontology and Moral Reasoning

• Deontology emphasizes adherence to moral rules and duties regardless of outcomes
• Asserts certain actions are inherently right or wrong based on moral principles (lying, stealing)
• Focuses on the intentions behind actions rather than just the consequences
• Kant's Categorical Imperative states one should act according to rules that could become universal laws
• Moral reasoning involves using logic and critical thinking to determine ethical courses of action
• Considers factors such as rights, responsibilities, fairness, and justice when making moral judgments (criminal justice system)

Virtue Ethics

• Virtue ethics emphasizes moral character development rather than rules or consequences
• Focuses on cultivating virtuous traits such as compassion, integrity, courage, and wisdom
• Argues good actions stem from good character and vice versa
• Aristotle identified moral virtues as means between extremes (courage between cowardice and recklessness)
• Raises questions about what defines virtues and how they should be prioritized
• Challenges include the potential for conflicting virtues and difficulty assessing character (job interviews)

Ethical Perspectives

Relativism and Absolutism

• Ethical relativism holds that moral judgments are relative to individual or cultural beliefs
• Asserts there are no universal moral principles applicable to all people at all times
• Descriptive relativism observes diversity of moral views while normative relativism claims rightness of views depends on context
• Ethical absolutism contends there are universal, objective moral standards
• Argues some actions are always right or wrong regardless of context (murder, genocide)
• Divine Command Theory grounds absolute morality in the commands of a deity
• Challenges to absolutism include the diversity of religious/cultural beliefs and dilemmas with conflicting absolutes

The Golden Rule

• The Golden Rule is the principle of treating others as one wants to be treated
• Variations of the rule are present in many religions and philosophies worldwide (Christianity, Confucianism)
• Encourages perspective-taking and reciprocity in moral reasoning
• Challenges include potential for self-interest, differences in individual preferences, and applications to those who wish to be treated poorly (masochists)
• Serves as a general guideline but may require additional moral principles for complex situations

Professional Ethics

Codes of Ethics and Ethical Standards

• Professional codes of ethics are formal guidelines governing the conduct of members of a profession
• Establish standards of practice, ethical principles, and rules to handle common issues (confidentiality, conflicts of interest)
• Aim to maintain public trust, uphold integrity of the profession, and provide guidance for practitioners
• Developed by professional organizations or governing bodies (American Medical Association, American Bar Association)
• Often legally binding with penalties for violations ranging from fines to loss of licensure
• Limitations include the inability to cover all situations, potential for misinterpretation, and challenges of enforcement
• Complement individual ethical judgment but do not replace the need for personal moral reasoning (whistleblowing)