🥯Learning Unit 2 – Classical Conditioning – Pavlov's Contributions

Classical conditioning, a fundamental learning process, was pioneered by Ivan Pavlov through his experiments with dogs. Pavlov discovered that neutral stimuli could elicit responses when paired with stimuli that naturally trigger reactions. This laid the groundwork for understanding how organisms form associations between stimuli and responses. Pavlov's work introduced key concepts like unconditioned and conditioned stimuli and responses, acquisition, and extinction. His research had a profound impact on behaviorism and psychology, influencing theories of learning and behavior modification. Classical conditioning continues to be applied in various fields, from advertising to treating phobias.

Key Concepts and Definitions

  • Classical conditioning: learning process that occurs when a neutral stimulus is paired with a stimulus that naturally produces a response
  • Unconditioned stimulus (US): stimulus that automatically triggers a response without any prior learning (food)
  • Unconditioned response (UR): unlearned, automatic response to the unconditioned stimulus (salivation)
  • Conditioned stimulus (CS): previously neutral stimulus that comes to trigger a response after being paired with the unconditioned stimulus (bell)
  • Conditioned response (CR): learned response to the conditioned stimulus that is similar to the unconditioned response (salivation to bell)
    • Occurs after repeated pairings of the CS and US
  • Acquisition: initial stage of learning where the association between the CS and US is formed and strengthened
  • Extinction: gradual weakening and disappearance of the conditioned response when the CS is repeatedly presented without the US

Historical Context

  • Ivan Pavlov (1849-1936) was a Russian physiologist who studied digestive processes in dogs
  • Pavlov noticed that dogs began salivating before food was actually delivered, suggesting a learned association
  • Pavlov's work on conditioned reflexes laid the foundation for the study of classical conditioning
    • Demonstrated that neutral stimuli could acquire the ability to elicit responses through association
  • Pavlov's research was influenced by the work of other physiologists and psychologists of his time (Vladimir Bekhterev, Edward Thorndike)
  • Pavlov's findings had a significant impact on the development of behaviorism, a major school of thought in psychology
  • Classical conditioning became a cornerstone of behavioral psychology and influenced theories of learning, behavior modification, and therapy
  • Pavlov's work earned him the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1904

Pavlov's Experimental Setup

  • Pavlov used dogs as experimental subjects to study digestive processes and conditioned reflexes
  • Dogs were restrained in a harness and had a small tube surgically implanted in their cheeks to measure salivation
  • The experimental apparatus allowed Pavlov to present various stimuli and measure the dogs' salivary response
  • Initially, Pavlov presented food (US) to the dogs, which naturally triggered salivation (UR)
  • Pavlov then introduced a neutral stimulus, such as a bell (CS), before presenting the food
    • The bell was rung a few seconds before the food was given
  • After several pairings of the bell and food, the dogs began to salivate in response to the bell alone (CR)
  • Pavlov systematically varied the timing and presentation of stimuli to study the factors influencing conditioning

Components of Classical Conditioning

  • Unconditioned stimulus (US): biologically potent stimulus that naturally triggers a response (food, loud noise)
  • Unconditioned response (UR): automatic, unlearned reaction to the US (salivation, startle reflex)
  • Conditioned stimulus (CS): initially neutral stimulus that comes to elicit a response after being paired with the US (bell, tone)
  • Conditioned response (CR): learned reaction to the CS that resembles the UR (salivation to bell)
  • Temporal contiguity: CS and US must occur close together in time for conditioning to occur
    • Optimal interval between CS and US is typically a few seconds
  • Contingency: probability of the US occurring in the presence of the CS compared to its absence
    • Higher contingency leads to stronger conditioning
  • Stimulus generalization: tendency for stimuli similar to the CS to elicit the CR (tones of similar pitch)

Process and Stages

  • Acquisition: gradual development and strengthening of the conditioned response through repeated CS-US pairings
    • Number of pairings required for acquisition varies depending on the stimuli and organism
  • Extinction: gradual weakening and disappearance of the CR when the CS is repeatedly presented without the US
    • Occurs when the CS no longer predicts the occurrence of the US
  • Spontaneous recovery: reappearance of the extinguished CR after a period of rest without exposure to the CS
    • Demonstrates that extinction does not erase the original learning
  • Stimulus discrimination: ability to distinguish between stimuli and respond differently to the CS and other similar stimuli
  • Higher-order conditioning: a previously conditioned stimulus (CS1) can serve as a US for a new CS (CS2)
    • Allows for the formation of complex chains of associations
  • Latent inhibition: prior exposure to the CS without the US can slow down subsequent conditioning
    • Familiarity with the CS reduces its associability with the US

Types of Conditioning

  • Delay conditioning: CS is presented first and remains on until the US is delivered
    • Most common type of conditioning procedure
  • Trace conditioning: CS is presented and terminated before the US is delivered
    • Requires a "trace" memory of the CS to bridge the gap between the stimuli
  • Backward conditioning: US is presented before the CS
    • Generally less effective than forward conditioning (CS before US)
  • Simultaneous conditioning: CS and US are presented at the same time and terminate together
    • Typically produces weaker conditioning compared to delay or trace procedures
  • Temporal conditioning: organisms can learn to respond based on the passage of time alone
    • Conditioned response occurs at a specific time interval after the CS
  • Sensory preconditioning: association between two neutral stimuli (CS1 and CS2) can be formed before either is paired with a US

Real-World Applications

  • Taste aversion: association between a food (CS) and illness (US) can lead to avoidance of that food
    • Can occur even with long delays between the CS and US (hours)
  • Phobias and anxiety disorders: learned fear responses to specific stimuli (animals, heights) through classical conditioning
    • Treatment often involves exposure therapy to extinguish the conditioned fear response
  • Drug tolerance and withdrawal: repeated use of a drug (US) can lead to compensatory responses (CR) that oppose the drug's effects
    • Withdrawal symptoms are a manifestation of the CR in the absence of the drug
  • Advertising and marketing: pairing a product (CS) with positive stimuli (attractive models, pleasant music) to create favorable associations
  • Placebo effect: learned association between a placebo treatment (CS) and a physiological response (pain relief, improved mood)
    • Demonstrates the power of classical conditioning in shaping subjective experiences

Limitations and Criticisms

  • Classical conditioning is a relatively simple form of learning that does not account for more complex cognitive processes
    • Does not explain how organisms learn novel behaviors or solve problems
  • Conditioning is not always adaptive and can lead to maladaptive behaviors (phobias, superstitions)
  • The role of biological preparedness and evolutionary history in conditioning is not fully addressed by the traditional model
    • Some stimuli are more readily associated with certain responses due to evolutionary significance (taste aversion)
  • Classical conditioning does not consider the influence of motivation, attention, and individual differences in learning
  • The strict temporal and contingency requirements of classical conditioning may not always hold in real-world situations
    • Learning can occur with longer delays or partial reinforcement schedules
  • Later research has shown that animals can learn about the predictive relationships between stimuli (Rescorla-Wagner model)
    • Challenges the idea that conditioning is solely based on contiguity and repetition


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.