5.8 Karl Marx

Karl Marx's ideas revolutionized literary criticism, emphasizing economic forces and class struggle in shaping human experience. His materialist approach analyzes literature through the lens of class relations and production conditions.

Marxist literary criticism examines how texts reflect, reinforce, or challenge dominant ideologies and power structures. It explores literature's role in promoting or resisting false consciousness, and its potential for raising class awareness and inspiring social change.

Philosophical foundations of Marxism

• Marxism is a philosophical, economic, and political theory developed by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in the 19th century
• It provides a materialist analysis of history, society, and culture, emphasizing the role of economic forces and class struggle in shaping human experience
• Marxist philosophy serves as the foundation for Marxist literary criticism, which examines literature through the lens of class relations and the material conditions of production

Dialectical materialism

Top images from around the web for Dialectical materialism

• 

  Reading: Conflict Theory and Society | Sociology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Socialist View: Marx's Historical Materialism View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Karl Marx – ZUM-Unterrichten View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Reading: Conflict Theory and Society | Sociology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Socialist View: Marx's Historical Materialism View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Dialectical materialism

• 

  Reading: Conflict Theory and Society | Sociology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Socialist View: Marx's Historical Materialism View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Karl Marx – ZUM-Unterrichten View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Reading: Conflict Theory and Society | Sociology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Socialist View: Marx's Historical Materialism View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Dialectical materialism is the philosophical approach that underpins Marxist thought
• It combines the concept of dialectics (the idea that progress occurs through the conflict and resolution of opposing forces) with materialism (the belief that material reality is the primary determinant of social and historical development)
• Dialectical materialism posits that the world is in a constant state of change and that this change is driven by the interaction of opposing forces (thesis and antithesis) which eventually lead to a new synthesis
• This process of dialectical change is seen as the fundamental driver of historical progress and social transformation

Historical materialism

• Historical materialism is the application of dialectical materialism to the study of history and society
• It argues that the development of human societies is primarily determined by their material and economic conditions, rather than by ideas or individual actions
• According to historical materialism, the mode of production (the way in which a society produces and distributes goods) shapes the social, political, and cultural institutions of that society
• Changes in the mode of production lead to changes in the social and political structure, which in turn influence the development of ideas and culture

Critique of idealism

• Marxist philosophy is fundamentally opposed to idealism, which holds that ideas and consciousness are the primary determinants of reality
• Marx and Engels argued that idealism inverts the true relationship between material conditions and ideas, obscuring the real sources of social and historical change
• They criticized idealist philosophies, such as Hegelianism, for presenting ideas as autonomous forces that shape the world, rather than as products of material conditions
• For Marxists, the critique of idealism is essential for understanding the true nature of social reality and for developing effective strategies for social and political change

Marxist theory of history

• The Marxist theory of history, also known as historical materialism, is a central component of Marxist thought
• It provides a materialist framework for understanding the development of human societies and the forces that drive historical change
• According to this theory, the history of human societies is primarily determined by their economic and material conditions, rather than by ideas or individual actions

Base vs superstructure

• The Marxist theory of history distinguishes between the economic base of a society (the mode of production and the relations of production) and its superstructure (the political, legal, and cultural institutions that arise from the economic base)
• The economic base is seen as the foundation of a society, determining the nature and development of the superstructure
• Changes in the economic base, such as the transition from feudalism to capitalism, lead to corresponding changes in the superstructure, including political revolutions and cultural transformations
• While the superstructure can influence the economic base, Marxists argue that the base is ultimately the primary determinant of historical change

Means of production

• The means of production refer to the physical and technological resources used to produce goods and services, such as land, factories, machines, and raw materials
• In Marxist theory, the ownership and control of the means of production are central to understanding the class structure and power relations of a society
• In capitalist societies, the means of production are privately owned by the bourgeoisie (the ruling class), while the proletariat (the working class) is forced to sell its labor to survive
• The concentration of the means of production in the hands of a small ruling class is seen as the source of exploitation and inequality in capitalist societies

Class struggle as driving force

• Class struggle, the conflict between different social classes over the control of the means of production and the distribution of wealth, is seen as the primary driving force of historical change in Marxist theory
• Marx and Engels argued that the history of all hitherto existing societies is the history of class struggles, from the conflicts between slaves and slave-owners in ancient societies to the struggles between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat in capitalist societies
• The resolution of class struggles, through the overthrow of the ruling class and the establishment of a classless society, is seen as the ultimate goal of Marxist revolutionary politics
• In the context of literary criticism, class struggle is often analyzed as a central theme in works of literature, reflecting the social and political conflicts of the time

Marxist literary criticism

• Marxist literary criticism is an approach to literature that focuses on the relationship between literary works and the social, economic, and political conditions in which they were produced
• It examines how literature reflects, reinforces, or challenges the dominant ideologies and power structures of a society
• Marxist critics analyze the ways in which literary works are shaped by the material conditions of their production and reception, and how they contribute to the reproduction or transformation of social relations

Literature as reflection of society

• Marxist critics argue that literature is not an autonomous realm of creative expression, but rather a product of the social and historical conditions in which it is created
• Literary works are seen as reflecting the values, beliefs, and conflicts of the society in which they were produced, often in ways that are not immediately apparent to readers
• By analyzing the social and historical context of a literary work, Marxist critics seek to uncover the hidden ideological messages and power relations that shape its content and form
• For example, a Marxist reading of Charles Dickens' novel "Hard Times" might focus on how the work reflects the social and economic inequalities of Victorian England, and how it critiques the dehumanizing effects of industrial capitalism

Art and class consciousness

• Marxist critics are interested in how literature can contribute to the development of class consciousness, the awareness of one's position within the class structure of society and the recognition of the shared interests and struggles of one's class
• Literary works that expose the contradictions and injustices of capitalist society, or that give voice to the experiences and aspirations of the working class, are seen as potentially revolutionary in their effects
• Marxist critics often celebrate works of proletarian literature, such as the novels of Maxim Gorky or the poetry of Vladimir Mayakovsky, which directly address the concerns and struggles of the working class
• At the same time, Marxist critics also recognize that literary works can serve to reinforce dominant ideologies and power relations, by presenting a distorted or incomplete picture of social reality

Revolutionary potential of literature

• For Marxist critics, the ultimate goal of literary analysis is not simply to interpret texts, but to contribute to the transformation of society and the creation of a more just and equitable world
• Literature is seen as a potential tool for raising class consciousness, inspiring revolutionary action, and imagining alternative forms of social organization
• Marxist critics often focus on the subversive or oppositional elements within literary works, such as moments of resistance, critique, or utopian vision, which point towards the possibility of social change
• The revolutionary potential of literature is not seen as residing in the text itself, but in the ways in which it is interpreted, appropriated, and mobilized by readers and critics in the context of ongoing social and political struggles

Ideology and false consciousness

• Ideology, in the Marxist sense, refers to the system of ideas, beliefs, and values that shape an individual's perception of reality and their place within society
• Marxist critics argue that ideology is not a neutral or objective reflection of reality, but rather a distorted and partial view that serves the interests of the dominant class
• The concept of false consciousness, developed by Georg Lukács, refers to the way in which ideology can lead individuals to accept and internalize the dominant values and beliefs of their society, even when these beliefs are contrary to their own interests

Dominant vs subordinate ideologies

• In any given society, there are multiple and competing ideologies, but one ideology tends to be dominant, reflecting the interests and worldview of the ruling class
• Subordinate ideologies, such as those of the working class or oppressed groups, may challenge or resist the dominant ideology, but they are often marginalized or suppressed by the institutions of power
• Marxist critics are interested in how literary works reflect and reinforce the dominant ideology of their time, as well as how they may give voice to subordinate or oppositional ideologies
• For example, a Marxist reading of Jane Austen's novels might focus on how they reflect the values and assumptions of the English landed gentry, while marginalizing or erasing the perspectives of the lower classes

Literature's role in promoting ideology

• Marxist critics argue that literature is not a neutral or innocent medium, but rather a powerful tool for shaping ideas, values, and beliefs
• Literary works can serve to naturalize and legitimize the dominant ideology of a society, by presenting it as common sense, inevitable, or universally valid
• Through techniques such as narrative structure, characterization, and imagery, literary works can encode ideological messages and assumptions that shape readers' perceptions of reality
• For example, a Marxist analysis of the Western genre might examine how these novels and films promote individualism, expansionism, and the myth of the frontier, while erasing the violence and exploitation of westward expansion

Strategies for resisting false consciousness

• Marxist critics are interested in how literary works can challenge or subvert the dominant ideology, by exposing its contradictions, limitations, or hidden agendas
• One strategy for resisting false consciousness is through the use of defamiliarization or estrangement, a technique that makes the familiar seem strange or alien, in order to break through the naturalized assumptions of ideology
• Another strategy is through the use of dialectical irony, a rhetorical device that juxtaposes conflicting perspectives or ideas in order to reveal their underlying tensions and contradictions
• Marxist critics also emphasize the importance of critical reading practices, which actively interrogate the ideological assumptions and power relations embedded in literary texts, rather than passively consuming them as entertainment or escape

Marxist aesthetics

• Marxist aesthetics is concerned with the relationship between art and politics, and the ways in which artistic form and content reflect and shape social reality
• Marxist critics reject the idea of art for art's sake, arguing that all art is inherently political and ideological, whether explicitly or implicitly
• The key debates in Marxist aesthetics revolve around questions of realism, modernism, and the avant-garde, and the role of art in the struggle for social and political emancipation

Realism vs modernism debate

• The debate between realism and modernism was a central issue in Marxist aesthetics in the early 20th century
• Realist writers and critics, such as Georg Lukács, argued that the task of art was to provide a truthful and comprehensive representation of social reality, in order to expose the contradictions and injustices of capitalist society
• Modernist writers and critics, such as Bertolt Brecht and Walter Benjamin, argued that realism was inadequate to the task of representing the fragmented and alienated experience of modern life, and that new artistic forms were needed to shock and provoke audiences into critical reflection
• The debate between realism and modernism reflected deeper tensions within Marxist theory, between the need for accessible and popular art forms and the desire for radical experimentation and innovation

Form and content in Marxist criticism

• Marxist critics are interested in the relationship between the form and content of literary works, and how they reflect and shape social and political meanings
• Form refers to the aesthetic and structural elements of a work, such as language, style, genre, and narrative technique, while content refers to the thematic and ideological messages conveyed by the work
• Marxist critics argue that form and content are not separate or autonomous categories, but rather dialectically related aspects of the literary work as a whole
• The choice of literary form, such as the use of realism or modernist techniques, is seen as inherently political, reflecting the author's stance towards social reality and the possibilities for change

Avant-garde and political art

• The concept of the avant-garde, or the radical and experimental edge of artistic production, has been central to Marxist debates about the political role of art
• Avant-garde artists, such as the Surrealists or the Constructivists, sought to break with traditional artistic forms and conventions, in order to create new modes of perception and experience that could challenge the dominant ideology
• Marxist critics have debated the effectiveness and limitations of avant-garde art as a tool for political change, with some arguing that it risks becoming elitist or self-referential, while others see it as a necessary complement to more accessible and popular forms of political art
• The relationship between avant-garde experimentation and political commitment remains a contested issue in Marxist aesthetics, reflecting the broader tensions between the demands of artistic autonomy and the imperatives of social and political engagement

Key Marxist literary critics

• Marxist literary criticism has been shaped by the contributions of a number of key thinkers and writers, who have developed and refined its theoretical and methodological approaches
• These critics have drawn on the insights of Marxist philosophy and political economy to analyze the social and historical dimensions of literature, and to explore its potential for ideological critique and political mobilization
• While differing in their specific emphases and approaches, these critics share a commitment to the Marxist project of social and cultural transformation, and to the role of literature in the struggle for human emancipation

Georg Lukács

• Georg Lukács was a Hungarian Marxist philosopher and literary critic, who played a key role in the development of Marxist aesthetics in the early 20th century
• Lukács is best known for his theory of realism, which he developed in opposition to the modernist and avant-garde movements of his time
• He argued that the task of literature was to provide a truthful and comprehensive representation of social reality, in order to expose the contradictions and injustices of capitalist society
• Lukács's emphasis on the cognitive and educational function of literature, and his critique of modernist fragmentation and subjectivism, have been influential in Marxist literary criticism, even as his specific judgments and evaluations have been challenged and revised

Walter Benjamin

• Walter Benjamin was a German Jewish philosopher and cultural critic, whose work has had a profound influence on Marxist and post-Marxist theories of literature and art
• Benjamin is known for his concept of the "aura" of the work of art, which he saw as being eroded by the technologies of mechanical reproduction, such as photography and film
• He argued that the decline of the aura opened up new possibilities for the politicization of art, by making it more accessible and reproducible, and by breaking down the traditional distinctions between high and low culture
• Benjamin's writings on the relationship between art and technology, the politics of mass culture, and the revolutionary potential of the avant-garde have been influential in Marxist and post-Marxist debates about the role of art in social and political transformation

Theodor Adorno

• Theodor Adorno was a German philosopher and sociologist, who was a leading figure in the Frankfurt School of critical theory
• Adorno's work focused on the relationship between art and society, and the ways in which aesthetic form and cultural production are shaped by the contradictions and crises of modern capitalism
• He argued that the culture industry of mass media and entertainment served to pacify and integrate the masses into the dominant ideology, by providing them with standardized and repetitive forms of distraction and escape
• Adorno's critique of the culture industry, and his emphasis on the need for autonomous and critical art forms, have been influential in Marxist and post-Marxist debates about the politics of popular culture and the avant-garde

Fredric Jameson

• Fredric Jameson is an American literary critic and political theorist, who has been a leading figure in the development of Marxist and post-Marxist cultural studies
• Jameson is known for his concept of "cognitive mapping," which he sees as the task of art and criticism in the era of late capitalism
• He argues that the increasing complexity and fragmentation of social reality under globalization and postmodernism have made it difficult for individuals to locate themselves within the totality of social relations
• Jameson's writings on the politics of postmodernism, the dialectic of utopia and ideology, and the need for a renewed Marxist critique of culture have been influential in contemporary debates about the role of literature and criticism in the struggle for social justice

Marxist approaches to specific genres

• Marxist literary criticism has developed specific approaches to the analysis of different literary genres, based on their historical and social contexts of production and reception
• These approaches seek to uncover the ways in which the formal and thematic elements of different genres reflect and shape the ideological and material conditions of their time
• By examining the social and political functions of specific genres, Marxist critics aim to deepen our understanding of the complex relationships between literature, culture, and society

The realist novel

• The realist novel, which emerged in the 19th century as a dominant literary form, has been a key focus of Marxist literary criticism
• Marxist critics have analyzed the ways in which realist novels, such as those of Balzac, Dickens, and Tolstoy, provide a comprehensive and detailed representation of social reality, exposing the contradictions and conflicts of bourgeois society
• At the same time, they have also criticized the limitations of realism, arguing that it often presents a naturalized and idealized view of social relations, and fails to capture the more radical and transformative aspects of human experience
• Marxist approaches to the realist novel have emphasized the need to situate these works within their historical and social contexts, and to examine the ways in which they both reflect and shape the dominant ideologies of their time

Epic theater of Bertolt Brecht

• The epic theater of Bertolt Brecht, a German playwright and director, has been a key reference point for Marxist debates about the political role of art
• Brecht developed a theory and practice of theater that sought to break with the conventions of bourgeois realism and naturalism, and to create a more critical and engaged form of spectatorship
• He used techniques such as the "alienation effect," which sought to distance the audience from the