8.4 Subversion and containment

Subversion and containment in literature represent opposing forces in the cultural struggle over meaning and impact. Subversive works challenge dominant ideologies and power structures, while containment strategies aim to control and neutralize disruptive elements.

This dynamic tension plays out through various literary techniques, critical approaches, and negotiations of identity. Understanding this interplay illuminates how literature can both reinforce and resist prevailing social norms and power relations.

Subversion in literature

• Subversion in literature involves challenging dominant ideologies, questioning social norms, and undermining power structures through various literary techniques and themes
• Subversive literature often aims to expose and critique the limitations, contradictions, and oppressive aspects of prevailing beliefs, values, and systems in society
• By presenting alternative perspectives, marginalized voices, and unconventional narratives, subversive literature seeks to disrupt the status quo and encourage critical thinking and social change

Challenging dominant ideologies

Top images from around the web for Challenging dominant ideologies

• 

  On African Liberation Day, there is renewed focus on struggle against capitalism and imperialism ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  “Working on the Water, Fighting for the Land”: A New Comic Book about Colonialism, Capitalism ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Role of Patriarchy in the Roll-back of Democracy | Heinrich Böll Stiftung | Nairobi Office ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  On African Liberation Day, there is renewed focus on struggle against capitalism and imperialism ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  “Working on the Water, Fighting for the Land”: A New Comic Book about Colonialism, Capitalism ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Challenging dominant ideologies

• 

  On African Liberation Day, there is renewed focus on struggle against capitalism and imperialism ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  “Working on the Water, Fighting for the Land”: A New Comic Book about Colonialism, Capitalism ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Role of Patriarchy in the Roll-back of Democracy | Heinrich Böll Stiftung | Nairobi Office ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  On African Liberation Day, there is renewed focus on struggle against capitalism and imperialism ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  “Working on the Water, Fighting for the Land”: A New Comic Book about Colonialism, Capitalism ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Subversive literature questions and undermines dominant ideologies (capitalism, patriarchy, colonialism) that shape society's beliefs, values, and power relations
• Exposes the contradictions, limitations, and oppressive aspects of prevailing worldviews and belief systems
• Presents alternative perspectives and narratives that challenge the legitimacy and naturalness of dominant ideologies
• Encourages readers to critically examine and resist the ideological forces that shape their lives and society

Questioning social norms

• Subversive literature challenges and subverts social norms, conventions, and expectations that regulate individual behavior and maintain social order
• Exposes the arbitrary, restrictive, and oppressive nature of social norms related to gender, sexuality, race, class, and other aspects of identity
• Presents characters, relationships, and situations that deviate from or transgress normative standards and expectations
• Encourages readers to question the validity and desirability of prevailing social norms and to imagine alternative ways of being and relating

Undermining power structures

• Subversive literature seeks to expose, critique, and undermine the power structures and hierarchies that shape social, political, and economic relations
• Reveals the mechanisms of power, domination, and exploitation that operate within institutions (government, religion, education, family)
• Gives voice and agency to marginalized, oppressed, and excluded groups, challenging their subordination and erasure within dominant power structures
• Imagines and advocates for alternative forms of social organization and power relations based on principles of equality, justice, and liberation

Containment strategies

• Containment strategies are methods used by dominant groups, institutions, and discourses to control, suppress, or neutralize subversive elements in literature and society
• These strategies aim to maintain the status quo, protect existing power structures, and limit the transformative potential of subversive ideas and movements
• Containment operates through various cultural, political, and economic mechanisms that shape the production, circulation, and reception of literature

Censorship and suppression

• Censorship involves the direct suppression or prohibition of subversive literature by state, religious, or other authorities
• Suppression can take the form of banning, confiscating, or destroying subversive texts, as well as punishing or silencing their authors and publishers
• Censorship aims to control the dissemination of ideas, images, and narratives that are deemed threatening, offensive, or contrary to dominant values and interests
• Examples of censorship include the Index Librorum Prohibitorum, the Comics Code Authority, and the fatwa against Salman Rushdie's The Satanic Verses

Co-opting subversive elements

• Co-optation involves the absorption, appropriation, or neutralization of subversive elements by dominant cultural and economic forces
• Subversive ideas, styles, and practices are selectively adopted and commodified by mainstream institutions (media, entertainment, fashion) in ways that dilute their oppositional meaning and potential
• Co-optation transforms subversive literature into marketable products, trendy aesthetics, or harmless entertainment, stripping away their political and social critique
• Examples of co-optation include the commercialization of punk fashion, the adaptation of subversive literature into Hollywood films, and the incorporation of countercultural elements into advertising

Reframing narratives

• Reframing involves the discursive strategies used to reinterpret, contextualize, or delegitimize subversive literature in ways that align with dominant ideologies and interests
• Subversive texts are framed as immoral, dangerous, or misguided, often through appeals to religious, nationalist, or traditionalist values
• Reframing can also involve the selective emphasis, decontextualization, or misrepresentation of subversive elements to obscure their critical and transformative implications
• Examples of reframing include the characterization of subversive literature as obscene, unpatriotic, or corrupting to youth, as well as the appropriation of subversive symbols and slogans by reactionary movements

Subversion vs containment

• The relationship between subversion and containment in literature is characterized by a dynamic tension between opposing forces, cycles of resistance and control, and the ongoing negotiation of boundaries
• Subversive literature seeks to challenge, undermine, and transform dominant ideologies, norms, and power structures, while containment strategies aim to control, neutralize, and assimilate subversive elements
• The struggle between subversion and containment reflects broader social, political, and cultural conflicts over the production, circulation, and interpretation of meaning and value

Tension between opposing forces

• Subversion and containment represent opposing forces in the cultural and ideological struggle over the meaning and impact of literature
• Subversive literature seeks to disrupt, critique, and transform the status quo, while containment strategies aim to maintain, defend, and reproduce existing power relations and values
• The tension between these forces is manifested in the constant push and pull between innovation and tradition, resistance and repression, and change and stability in the literary field

Cycles of resistance and control

• The relationship between subversion and containment is characterized by ongoing cycles of resistance and control, as subversive movements emerge, gain momentum, and face backlash from dominant institutions
• Subversive literature opens up spaces for critique, imagination, and solidarity, which are then met with censorship, co-optation, and reframing by those in power
• These cycles reflect the historical dialectic between oppression and liberation, as well as the resilience and adaptability of both subversive and dominant forces

Negotiating boundaries

• The struggle between subversion and containment involves the constant negotiation and renegotiation of boundaries - between acceptable and unacceptable forms of expression, between legitimate and illegitimate forms of critique, and between included and excluded voices and perspectives
• Subversive literature seeks to push against and redraw these boundaries, while containment strategies aim to police and reinforce them
• The outcomes of these negotiations are shaped by the relative power, resources, and alliances of subversive and dominant groups, as well as by broader shifts in social, political, and cultural conditions

Subversive literary techniques

• Subversive literary techniques are the formal and rhetorical strategies used by authors to challenge, critique, and undermine dominant ideologies, norms, and power structures
• These techniques often involve the creative use of language, narrative structure, and literary devices to create dissonance, ambiguity, and irony, inviting readers to question and reinterpret conventional meanings and assumptions
• Subversive techniques are not inherently political, but can be used to serve various ideological and aesthetic purposes, depending on the author's intentions and the reader's context

Irony and satire

• Irony involves the use of language that says one thing but means another, often to highlight the contradictions, absurdities, or hypocrisies of a situation or belief system
• Satire is a form of irony that uses wit, exaggeration, and ridicule to criticize and expose the vices, follies, and abuses of individuals, groups, or institutions
• Subversive irony and satire can be used to mock, parody, and subvert dominant ideologies, norms, and power structures, revealing their limitations, inconsistencies, and oppressive effects
• Examples of subversive irony and satire include Jonathan Swift's A Modest Proposal, Voltaire's Candide, and George Orwell's Animal Farm

Allegory and symbolism

• Allegory is a narrative technique that uses characters, events, and settings to represent abstract ideas, moral qualities, or political realities
• Symbolism involves the use of objects, actions, or images to evoke multiple layers of meaning, often in ways that are ambiguous, paradoxical, or open to interpretation
• Subversive allegory and symbolism can be used to encode and communicate subversive messages, critique dominant systems, and imagine alternative realities, while evading censorship and persecution
• Examples of subversive allegory and symbolism include Dante's Divine Comedy, William Blake's Songs of Innocence and of Experience, and Ralph Ellison's Invisible Man

Unreliable narrators

• Unreliable narration is a technique in which the credibility and authority of the narrator is called into question, often through their limited knowledge, biased perspective, or deceptive intentions
• Subversive unreliable narration can be used to challenge the authority and legitimacy of dominant discourses, expose the constructed nature of truth and reality, and invite readers to actively interpret and question the text
• Unreliable narrators can also be used to give voice to marginalized, excluded, or silenced perspectives, subverting the assumptions and expectations of mainstream readers
• Examples of subversive unreliable narration include Vladimir Nabokov's Lolita, Ken Kesey's One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, and Kazuo Ishiguro's The Remains of the Day

Containment in literary criticism

• Containment in literary criticism refers to the ways in which dominant schools of thought, interpretive frameworks, and evaluative criteria shape the reception, analysis, and canonization of literature
• Containment strategies in criticism often involve the depoliticization, formalization, and selective inclusion of texts, in ways that reinforce dominant ideologies, norms, and power structures
• These strategies can serve to neutralize the subversive potential of literature, marginalize alternative perspectives and approaches, and reproduce existing cultural hierarchies and exclusions

New Criticism's depoliticization

• New Criticism was an influential school of literary criticism that emerged in the mid-20th century, emphasizing close reading, formal analysis, and the autonomy of the literary text
• New Critics sought to depoliticize literature by focusing on its intrinsic aesthetic qualities, rather than its social, historical, or ideological contexts
• This depoliticization served to contain the subversive potential of literature, by divorcing it from its political and transformative implications and reducing it to a set of timeless, universal values
• New Criticism's containment of literature was challenged by later schools of criticism (Marxist, feminist, postcolonial) that emphasized the political and contextual dimensions of literary meaning and value

Formalism's focus on aesthetics

• Formalism is a broad term for various critical approaches that prioritize the formal and aesthetic properties of literature over its content, context, or politics
• Formalist criticism often involves the close analysis of literary devices, structures, and styles, with the aim of identifying the unique features and effects of the text
• This focus on aesthetics can serve to contain the subversive potential of literature, by privileging form over content, technique over meaning, and art over politics
• Formalism's containment of literature was challenged by later schools of criticism that emphasized the inseparability of form and content, as well as the political and ideological implications of aesthetic choices

Canon formation and exclusion

• The literary canon refers to the body of texts that are considered to be of the highest artistic and cultural value, and that are widely taught, studied, and celebrated within a given society or tradition
• Canon formation involves the processes of selection, evaluation, and legitimation that determine which texts are included or excluded from the canon, often based on criteria of aesthetic merit, historical significance, and cultural representativeness
• Canon formation can serve as a containment strategy, by privileging texts that align with dominant ideologies, norms, and power structures, while marginalizing or excluding texts that challenge or subvert them
• The exclusions and biases of the traditional Western canon have been challenged by scholars and movements (feminist, postcolonial, queer) that seek to expand and diversify the range of voices and perspectives represented in literary studies

Subversion and identity

• Subversion and identity are closely linked in literature, as subversive texts often challenge dominant constructions of identity and give voice to marginalized, stereotyped, or excluded groups
• Subversive literature can expose the ways in which identities are socially constructed, historically contingent, and shaped by relations of power and inequality
• By presenting alternative, fluid, and intersectional understandings of identity, subversive texts can undermine essentialist and oppressive identity categories, and imagine new possibilities for self-definition and collective solidarity

Marginalized voices

• Subversive literature often foregrounds the voices, experiences, and perspectives of marginalized groups (women, people of color, LGBTQ+ individuals, working-class people) that are underrepresented or misrepresented in dominant literary traditions
• By centering marginalized voices, subversive texts challenge the universality and neutrality of dominant narratives, and reveal the diversity, complexity, and resilience of human identities and experiences
• Marginalized voices in literature can also serve as a form of cultural resistance and empowerment, by affirming the validity and value of oppressed identities, and building solidarity among marginalized communities
• Examples of subversive texts that center marginalized voices include Zora Neale Hurston's Their Eyes Were Watching God, Audre Lorde's Zami: A New Spelling of My Name, and Arundhati Roy's The God of Small Things

Challenging stereotypes

• Subversive literature often challenges and subverts the stereotypes, prejudices, and assumptions that shape dominant perceptions of marginalized identities
• By presenting complex, nuanced, and multidimensional characters and experiences, subversive texts undermine the reductive, essentialist, and dehumanizing stereotypes that justify and perpetuate oppression
• Challenging stereotypes in literature can also involve the appropriation, parody, or deconstruction of dominant tropes and narratives, exposing their limitations, contradictions, and ideological functions
• Examples of subversive texts that challenge stereotypes include Chinua Achebe's Things Fall Apart, Maxine Hong Kingston's The Woman Warrior, and Alison Bechdel's Fun Home

Reclaiming agency

• Subversive literature often depicts marginalized characters reclaiming their agency, autonomy, and subjectivity in the face of oppressive social, cultural, and political forces
• By presenting characters who resist, subvert, or transform the conditions of their oppression, subversive texts challenge the passivity, victimization, and objectification of marginalized identities in dominant narratives
• Reclaiming agency in literature can also involve the exploration of alternative forms of power, desire, and relationality that transcend or subvert dominant norms and hierarchies
• Examples of subversive texts that depict characters reclaiming agency include Jamaica Kincaid's Annie John, Octavia Butler's Kindred, and Marjane Satrapi's Persepolis

Containment and power

• Containment and power are closely intertwined in literature, as containment strategies often serve to maintain and reproduce dominant power structures and relations
• Containment can operate through various forms of institutional authority, hegemonic discourse, and processes of normalization and assimilation that shape the production, circulation, and reception of literature
• By containing subversive elements and perspectives, dominant power structures seek to neutralize the transformative potential of literature and maintain their own legitimacy and control

Institutional authority

• Containment often operates through the institutional authority of dominant cultural, political, and economic organizations (schools, publishers, media, government) that shape the conditions of literary production and reception
• Institutional authority can involve the gatekeeping, regulation, and canonization of literature, determining which texts are published, promoted, and taught, and which are marginalized, censored, or excluded
• Institutional authority can also involve the framing and interpretation of literature, shaping the dominant critical discourses and evaluative criteria that determine its meaning and value
• Examples of institutional authority in literature include the publishing industry's focus on marketability, the educational system's emphasis on canonical texts, and the state's censorship of subversive materials

Hegemonic discourse

• Containment can also operate through the hegemonic discourse of dominant ideologies, values, and assumptions that shape the cultural common sense and limit the range of acceptable ideas and expressions
• Hegemonic discourse involves the naturalization and universalization of dominant perspectives, as well as the marginalization and delegitimization of alternative or oppositional views
• Hegemonic discourse can shape the themes, forms, and styles of literature, as well as the expectations and interpretations of readers, in ways that reinforce dominant power relations and interests
• Examples of hegemonic discourse in literature include the valorization of individual genius, the emphasis on aesthetic autonomy, and the marginalization of political and social critique

Normalization and assimilation

• Containment can also involve the processes of normalization and assimilation that seek to incorporate and domesticate subversive elements and identities within dominant cultural and social norms
• Normalization involves the regulation and standardization of literary forms, styles, and content, in ways that make them more predictable, manageable, and marketable
• Assimilation involves the selective inclusion and adaptation of marginalized voices and perspectives, in ways that dilute their oppositional potential and reinforce dominant power relations
• Examples of normalization and assimilation in literature include the mainstreaming of experimental techniques, the commodification of ethnic and racial identities, and the depoliticization of feminist and queer themes

Subversive genres and forms

• Subversive genres and forms are the literary modes, styles, and movements that challenge dominant aesthetic and ideological conventions, and explore new possibilities for expression and critique
• Subversive genres and forms often emerge in opposition to the limitations and exclusions of mainstream literature, and in response to broader social, cultural, and political struggles and transformations
• By pushing the boundaries of literary form and content, subversive genres