You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides
You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides

Hans Robert Jauss's revolutionized literary criticism by emphasizing the reader's role in creating meaning. He argued that a reader's historical and shapes their understanding of a text, challenging the idea of fixed textual meaning.

Jauss introduced the "" concept, which refers to the cultural norms and assumptions readers bring to a text. This framework influences interpretation and can shift over time, leading to new understandings of literary works across different eras and cultures.

Reception theory of Jauss

  • Jauss's reception theory emphasizes the active role of the reader in interpreting and making meaning from literary texts
  • Focuses on how a reader's historical, cultural, and personal context shapes their understanding and reception of a work
  • Argues that the meaning of a text is not fixed or inherent, but rather is constructed through the interaction between the text and the reader

Horizon of expectations concept

Horizon of expectations definition

Top images from around the web for Horizon of expectations definition
Top images from around the web for Horizon of expectations definition
  • The "horizon of expectations" refers to the set of cultural norms, assumptions, and literary conventions that a reader brings to a text
  • Includes the reader's prior knowledge, experiences, and expectations about literature and the world
  • Serves as a framework through which the reader interprets and makes sense of a literary work

Role of horizon of expectations

  • The horizon of expectations influences how a reader approaches, understands, and evaluates a text
  • Shapes the reader's interpretation by providing a context and set of expectations for the work
  • Can lead to different interpretations and receptions of the same text by readers with different horizons

Shifting horizons of expectations

  • Horizons of expectations are not fixed or static, but can change over time and across cultures
  • As society, cultural norms, and literary conventions evolve, so too do readers' horizons of expectations
  • The reception and interpretation of a work can shift as the horizon of expectations changes (Don Quixote, initially seen as comedic, later viewed as a complex novel)

Jauss vs Iser

Similarities in reception theories

  • Both Jauss and Iser emphasize the importance of the reader in the creation of meaning
  • Acknowledge that the text and the reader interact to produce interpretation and understanding
  • Challenge the idea of a single, fixed meaning inherent in the text itself

Key differences in approaches

  • Jauss focuses more on the historical and cultural context of the reader's horizon of expectations
  • Iser places greater emphasis on the individual reader's imagination and the "gaps" in the text that the reader fills
  • Jauss is more concerned with the collective reception of a work, while Iser focuses on the individual reading experience

Influence on reader-response criticism

Importance of the reader's role

  • Jauss's reception theory helped to establish the reader as an active participant in the creation of literary meaning
  • Challenged the idea of the passive reader and the text as the sole source of meaning
  • Paved the way for the development of reader-response criticism, which further explored the reader's role

Text-reader relationship dynamics

  • Reception theory highlights the complex, dynamic relationship between the text and the reader
  • The text provides a structure and set of potentials, while the reader actualizes and interprets these potentials
  • The meaning of a work emerges from the interaction and negotiation between the text and the reader

Jauss's seven theses

Provocative nature of theses

  • Jauss's seven theses, presented in his 1967 lecture, challenged traditional literary theories and methods
  • Argued for a new approach to literary history and interpretation that centered on the reader and reception
  • Theses were seen as provocative and controversial, sparking debate and discussion in the field

Key arguments presented

  • Literary works should be understood in terms of their reception and effect on readers, not just their production
  • The aesthetic value of a work lies in its ability to challenge and transform the reader's horizon of expectations
  • Literary history should be viewed as a dialogue between works and their readers, not a linear progression
  • The social function of literature lies in its ability to shape and change readers' perceptions and expectations

Historical context of Jauss's work

Post-war German literary culture

  • Jauss developed his reception theory in the context of post-World War II Germany
  • German literary culture was grappling with questions of tradition, innovation, and the role of literature in society
  • Jauss's theory offered a new perspective on these issues, emphasizing the reader's role in creating meaning

Responding to Russian Formalism

  • Jauss's work can be seen as a response to and critique of Russian Formalism
  • Formalists focused on the intrinsic properties of the text and the "literariness" of literature
  • Jauss argued that this approach neglected the reader and the historical context of literary works

Legacy and impact of Jauss

Contributions to reception studies

  • Jauss's reception theory helped to establish reception studies as a distinct field of inquiry
  • Influenced the development of reader-response criticism, as well as other approaches that emphasize the reader's role (feminist, postcolonial, and cultural studies)
  • Expanded the understanding of how literary works are received and interpreted across time and cultures

Criticisms and limitations

  • Some critics argue that Jauss's theory places too much emphasis on the reader and neglects the text itself
  • Questions remain about how to empirically study and verify the claims of reception theory
  • The concept of the "horizon of expectations" has been critiqued as too vague or difficult to define and measure
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Glossary