() are the building blocks of . They're constructed using , , and parentheses, following specific rules to ensure syntactic correctness.
Translating natural language into propositional logic involves assigning atomic propositions to simple statements and using connectives to combine them. Understanding the and logical structure of WFFs is crucial for evaluating truth values and constructing proofs.
Well-Formed Formulas (WFFs) in Propositional Logic
Definition of well-formed formulas
Top images from around the web for Definition of well-formed formulas
logic - Playing with propositional truth-tables - Mathematics Stack Exchange View original
Is this image relevant?
Propositional Logic Proof using I.P. or C.P or rules of inference - Mathematics Stack Exchange View original
Is this image relevant?
logic - Playing with propositional truth-tables - Mathematics Stack Exchange View original
Is this image relevant?
Propositional Logic Proof using I.P. or C.P or rules of inference - Mathematics Stack Exchange View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 2
Top images from around the web for Definition of well-formed formulas
logic - Playing with propositional truth-tables - Mathematics Stack Exchange View original
Is this image relevant?
Propositional Logic Proof using I.P. or C.P or rules of inference - Mathematics Stack Exchange View original
Is this image relevant?
logic - Playing with propositional truth-tables - Mathematics Stack Exchange View original
Is this image relevant?
Propositional Logic Proof using I.P. or C.P or rules of inference - Mathematics Stack Exchange View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 2
Syntactically correct formula in propositional logic follows set of rules that determine structure and composition
Constructed using:
Atomic propositions (p, q, r)
Logical connectives (¬ , ∧ , ∨ , → , ↔ )
and clarifying order of operations
Rules for constructing:
is a WFF
If ϕ is a WFF, then ¬ϕ is also a WFF
If ϕ and ψ are WFFs, then (ϕ∧ψ), (ϕ∨ψ), (ϕ→ψ), and (ϕ↔ψ) are also WFFs
Only formulas constructed using above rules are considered WFFs
Well-formed vs ill-formed formulas
Well-formed formulas follow in propositional logic (p, ¬q, (p∧q), ((p∨q)→r))
violate one or more rules for constructing WFFs
May have mismatched parentheses, missing operands, or incorrect use of connectives (¬, (p∨q, p∧∨q)
Translation and Logical Structure
Translation into propositional logic
Assign atomic propositions to simple declarative sentences ("It is raining" can be p)
Use logical connectives to combine atomic propositions based on relationships expressed in natural language statement
Negation (¬): "It is not raining" can be ¬p
Conjunction (∧): "It is raining and it is cold" can be (p∧q), where q represents "It is cold"
Disjunction (∨): "It is raining or it is cold" can be (p∨q)
Implication (→): "If it is raining, then the streets are wet" can be (p→r), where r represents "The streets are wet"
Biconditional (↔): "It is raining if and only if there are clouds in the sky" can be (p↔s), where s represents "There are clouds in the sky"
Main connectives and logical structure
Main connective is last connective applied when evaluating truth value of WFF, typically outermost connective not enclosed in parentheses
In ((p∧q)∨r), main connective is ∨
Identifying main connective helps determine logical structure of WFF
Logical structure of WFF can be represented using parentheses and order of connectives
((p∧q)∨r) has structure: (conjunction) ∨ (atomic proposition)
Understanding logical structure helps in evaluating truth value of WFF and constructing proofs