10.1 Newton's method for unconstrained optimization

Newton's method for unconstrained optimization is a powerful technique that uses both gradient and Hessian information to find minima or maxima of twice-differentiable functions. It offers quadratic convergence near the optimum, making it faster than first-order methods like gradient descent.

However, Newton's method has limitations. It requires computing and inverting the Hessian matrix, which can be computationally expensive for high-dimensional problems. It may also struggle with non-convex functions or when starting far from the optimum.

Newton's Method for Optimization

Concept and Derivation

Top images from around the web for Concept and Derivation

• 

  Newton's method - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Newton’s Method · Calculus View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  calculus - Newton conjugate gradient algorithm - Mathematics Stack Exchange View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Newton's method - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Newton’s Method · Calculus View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Concept and Derivation

• 

  Newton's method - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Newton’s Method · Calculus View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  calculus - Newton conjugate gradient algorithm - Mathematics Stack Exchange View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Newton's method - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Newton’s Method · Calculus View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Newton's method iteratively finds the minimum or maximum of a twice-differentiable function
• Utilizes second-order Taylor series expansion of the objective function around the current point
• Incorporates both gradient (first derivative) and Hessian matrix (second derivative) to determine search direction
• Derivation involves setting gradient of quadratic approximation to zero and solving for step direction
• Newton step calculated as $x_{k+1} = x_k - [H(x_k)]^{-1} \nabla f(x_k)$
• Assumes objective function locally quadratic and Hessian matrix positive definite
• Iteratively updates current solution until convergence criterion met (gradient norm sufficiently small)
• Provides quadratic convergence rate near local minimum
  • Error approximately squared in each iteration
  • Faster convergence compared to first-order methods (gradient descent)
• Region of quadratic convergence determined by local properties of objective function
  • Influenced by accuracy of quadratic approximation
  • Varies depending on function's characteristics (smooth vs non-smooth)

Mathematical Foundations

• Based on second-order Taylor series expansion
  • Approximates function behavior around current point
  • Captures curvature information through Hessian matrix
• Gradient $\nabla f(x)$ represents direction of steepest ascent
  • Used to determine search direction for optimization
  • Calculated as vector of partial derivatives
• Hessian matrix $H(x)$ contains second-order partial derivatives
  • Describes local curvature of objective function
  • Symmetric matrix for twice-differentiable functions
• Positive definiteness of Hessian ensures local convexity
  • Guarantees unique minimum in neighborhood of current point
  • Crucial for stability and convergence of Newton's method
• Inverse Hessian $[H(x)]^{-1}$ scales gradient to account for curvature
  • Allows for more intelligent step sizes compared to first-order methods
  • Can be computationally expensive for high-dimensional problems

Applying Newton's Method

Implementation Steps

• Identify objective function $f(x)$ and compute gradient $\nabla f(x)$ and Hessian matrix $H(x)$
• Choose initial starting point $x_0$ and set tolerance level $\varepsilon$ for convergence criterion
• Implement iterative update formula $x_{k+1} = x_k - [H(x_k)]^{-1} \nabla f(x_k)$
• Check for convergence by evaluating $\|\nabla f(x_{k+1})\| < \varepsilon$ or using other suitable stopping criteria
  • Gradient norm threshold (measures proximity to stationary point)
  • Relative change in function value (indicates diminishing improvements)
• Handle potential issues during iteration process
  • Non-invertible Hessian matrices (use regularization techniques)
  • Divergence (implement trust region or line search methods)
• Interpret final solution $x^*$ and optimal function value $f(x^*)$ in context of original problem
• Verify optimality by checking second-order sufficient conditions
  • Ensure positive definiteness of Hessian at $x^*$
  • Confirms local minimum rather than saddle point or maximum

Practical Considerations

• Choose appropriate initial point $x_0$
  • Closer to optimum generally leads to faster convergence
  • Multiple starting points can help avoid local minima
• Implement safeguards for numerical stability
  • Use Cholesky factorization for Hessian inversion
  • Apply regularization techniques for ill-conditioned Hessian
• Adapt algorithm for specific problem characteristics
  • Constrained optimization (incorporate barrier or penalty methods)
  • Non-smooth objectives (use smoothing techniques or alternative methods)
• Monitor convergence behavior
  • Track function value, gradient norm, and step size
  • Detect slow convergence or oscillations
• Consider computational resources
  • Memory requirements for storing Hessian matrix
  • Computational cost of Hessian evaluation and inversion

Convergence of Newton's Method

Convergence Properties

• Exhibits quadratic convergence rate near local minimum
  • Error approximately squared in each iteration
  • Rapid convergence once within quadratic convergence region
• Region of quadratic convergence determined by local properties of objective function
  • Size of region varies depending on function's characteristics
  • Smaller for highly nonlinear or poorly conditioned problems
• Global convergence not guaranteed
  • May fail to converge for certain initial points
  • Struggles with poorly conditioned problems or flat regions
• Computational complexity of each iteration $O(n^3)$ for n-dimensional problems
  • Due to Hessian matrix computation and inversion
  • Can become prohibitive for high-dimensional optimization
• Overall convergence speed depends on problem's condition number
  • Related to ratio of largest to smallest eigenvalues of Hessian
  • Well-conditioned problems converge faster

Convergence Improvements

• Line search methods improve global convergence properties
  • Ensure sufficient decrease in objective function
  • Backtracking line search (Armijo rule)
• Trust region methods enhance stability and convergence
  • Limit step size to region where quadratic model is accurate
  • Particularly useful for non-convex optimization problems
• Quasi-Newton methods approximate Hessian to reduce computational cost
  • BFGS (Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno) algorithm
  • L-BFGS for large-scale problems with limited memory
• Adaptive step size strategies balance convergence speed and stability
  • Increase step size in well-behaved regions
  • Decrease step size in challenging areas (high curvature, discontinuities)

Newton's Method vs Other Techniques

Advantages of Newton's Method

• Rapid convergence near optimum
  • Quadratic convergence rate in vicinity of solution
  • Exact minimum of quadratic functions in single step
• Provides both search direction and step size
  • Unlike gradient descent requiring separate line search
  • More efficient use of function and derivative information
• Invariant to linear transformations of coordinate system
  • Less sensitive to scaling of variables
  • Beneficial for problems with varying scales across dimensions
• Efficient for problems with small to moderate number of variables
  • Particularly when function evaluations expensive
  • Fewer iterations required compared to first-order methods

Limitations and Comparisons

• Requires computation and storage of Hessian matrix
  • Prohibitively expensive for large-scale problems
  • Limited applicability to high-dimensional optimization
• May fail or perform poorly when Hessian not positive definite
  • Occurs in non-convex regions of objective function
  • Requires modifications (e.g., Hessian regularization)
• Sensitive to starting point location
  • Performance degrades when far from optimum
  • May converge to local rather than global minimum
• Requires twice-differentiable functions
  • Limited applicability to non-smooth optimization problems
  • Gradient descent or subgradient methods more suitable for non-smooth cases
• Sensitive to numerical errors in Hessian computation and inversion
  • Can affect stability and accuracy of algorithm
  • Careful implementation of numerical routines necessary
• Comparison with other methods:
  • Gradient Descent: Simpler, more robust, but slower convergence
  • Conjugate Gradient: Balance between simplicity and efficiency
  • Quasi-Newton Methods: Approximate Hessian, reduced computational cost