3.2 Geometric interpretation of linear programs

Linear programs can be visualized in two dimensions, with variables on each axis. Constraints form lines or half-planes, creating a feasible region. The objective function is represented by parallel lines, with the gradient showing improvement direction.

Optimal solutions are found at vertices of the feasible region. The graphical method involves evaluating corner points or sliding the objective function line. While limited to two variables, this approach provides intuition for higher-dimensional problems solved computationally.

Linear Programming: Geometric Interpretation

Two-Dimensional Representation

Top images from around the web for Two-Dimensional Representation

• 

  Selected topics in finite mathematics/Linear programming - Wikiversity View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  3.2a. Solving Linear Programming Problems Graphically | Finite Math View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  3.2c. Examples: Solving Linear Programming Graphically | Finite Math View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Selected topics in finite mathematics/Linear programming - Wikiversity View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  3.2a. Solving Linear Programming Problems Graphically | Finite Math View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Two-Dimensional Representation

• 

  Selected topics in finite mathematics/Linear programming - Wikiversity View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  3.2a. Solving Linear Programming Problems Graphically | Finite Math View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  3.2c. Examples: Solving Linear Programming Graphically | Finite Math View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Selected topics in finite mathematics/Linear programming - Wikiversity View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  3.2a. Solving Linear Programming Problems Graphically | Finite Math View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Linear programming problems visualized in two-dimensional coordinate system with each variable corresponding to an axis
• Constraints depicted as lines or half-planes within the coordinate system
• Feasible region forms a convex polygon satisfying all constraints simultaneously
• Objective function represented by family of parallel lines in coordinate system
• Gradient vector of objective function determines direction of improvement
• Examples include production planning (units of product A vs. product B) and resource allocation (hours allocated to task 1 vs. task 2)

Constraint Visualization

• Constraint lines plotted by identifying two points satisfying the equation and connecting them
• Inequality constraints create half-planes shaded to indicate feasible side
• Examples of constraints
  • Budget constraint: $2x + 3y \leq 100$ (where x and y represent quantities of two products)
  • Time constraint: $4x + 5y \leq 80$ (where x and y represent hours spent on two tasks)
• Multiple constraints intersect to form the feasible region polygon

Feasible Region and Objective Function

Constructing the Feasible Region

• Plot all constraint lines on the coordinate system
• Identify area satisfying all constraints simultaneously
• Shade or highlight the feasible region
• Corner points (vertices) of feasible region represent potential optimal solutions
• Examples of feasible regions
  • Triangular region (three constraints intersecting)
  • Rectangular region (four constraints forming a box)
  • Unbounded region (extending infinitely in one or more directions)

Representing the Objective Function

• Objective function visualized as set of parallel lines
• Each line corresponds to a different constant value of the function
• Slope of objective function lines determined by coefficients of decision variables
• Direction of increasing objective function values shown by drawing multiple parallel lines
• Examples of objective functions
  • Profit maximization: $Z = 5x + 7y$ (where x and y represent quantities of two products)
  • Cost minimization: $Z = 3x + 2y$ (where x and y represent amounts of two resources)

Optimal Solution: Graphical Method

Corner Point Method

• Evaluate objective function at each vertex of feasible region to find optimal solution
• Systematically calculate objective function value for all corner points
• Compare values to determine maximum (for maximization) or minimum (for minimization)
• Example
  • Feasible region with vertices at (0,0), (0,10), (5,5), and (10,0)
  • Objective function $Z = 2x + 3y$
  • Evaluate Z at each point and compare values

Sliding Line Method

• Move line representing objective function across feasible region
• Continue until reaching furthest point in direction of optimization
• Last point of contact between objective function line and feasible region is optimal
• Useful for quickly identifying optimal solution visually
• Example
  • Maximization problem with objective function line moving upward
  • Minimization problem with objective function line moving downward

Special Cases

• Multiple optimal solutions occur when entire edge of feasible region is optimal
  • Represented by line segment connecting two vertices
  • Example: Two corner points yielding same maximum profit
• Unbounded solutions identified when feasible region extends infinitely in direction of improvement
  • Example: Profit increasing indefinitely as production increases without limit
• Infeasible problems recognized when constraints create empty feasible region
  • No points satisfy all constraints simultaneously
  • Example: Contradictory constraints like x ≥ 5 and x ≤ 3

Limitations of Graphical Method

Dimensionality Constraints

• Graphical method limited to problems with two decision variables
• Three-variable problems can be visualized using 3D graphing tools but become complex
• Linear programs with more than three variables cannot be fully visualized graphically
• Higher-dimensional problems require algebraic or computational methods for solution
• Examples of higher-dimensional problems
  • Portfolio optimization with multiple assets
  • Production planning with numerous products and constraints

Conceptual Extensions

• Feasible region in higher dimensions extends to convex polyhedron
• Optimal solution still occurs at a vertex of the polyhedron
• Geometric intuition from 2D problems applies conceptually to higher dimensions
• Examples of conceptual extensions
  • Visualizing a 4D cube as a tesseract
  • Thinking of higher-dimensional constraints as intersecting hyperplanes

Advanced Visualization Techniques

• Projections or slices provide partial graphical insights for higher-dimensional problems
• Do not offer complete solution method but aid in understanding problem structure
• Examples of advanced techniques
  • Parallel coordinates for visualizing multiple dimensions simultaneously
  • Heat maps for representing high-dimensional data in 2D color-coded format
• Combine with computational methods for solving complex linear programming problems