12.2 Framing of policy issues in the media

Media framing shapes how we see policy issues. It's like choosing which parts of a story to highlight and which to ignore. This can really change how people think about things, especially when they don't know much about the topic already.

Framing isn't just about what's said, but how it's said. Politicians, interest groups, and journalists all use frames to push their views. This can lead to biased coverage, so it's important to think critically about the news we consume.

Framing of Policy Issues

Concept and Role in Shaping Public Perception

Top images from around the web for Concept and Role in Shaping Public Perception

• 

  Cognitive Biases - Sensemaking Resources, Education, and Community View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Manageable Micro-Framing – Open at Scale: Project Guidelines View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Nature of Public Opinion | American National Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Cognitive Biases - Sensemaking Resources, Education, and Community View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Manageable Micro-Framing – Open at Scale: Project Guidelines View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Concept and Role in Shaping Public Perception

• 

  Cognitive Biases - Sensemaking Resources, Education, and Community View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Manageable Micro-Framing – Open at Scale: Project Guidelines View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Nature of Public Opinion | American National Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Cognitive Biases - Sensemaking Resources, Education, and Community View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Manageable Micro-Framing – Open at Scale: Project Guidelines View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Framing is the process of selecting and emphasizing certain aspects of an issue while downplaying or omitting others, which influences how the public interprets and responds to the issue
• Frames serve as cognitive shortcuts that help individuals make sense of complex policy issues by providing a specific context or perspective through which to view the issue
• The choice of frames can significantly impact public opinion, as they can:
  • Highlight specific problems
  • Assign blame
  • Suggest solutions
  • Evoke emotional responses
• Framing effects are particularly powerful when the public lacks prior knowledge or strong opinions about a policy issue, as frames can fill in gaps and shape initial perceptions

Impact on Public Opinion and Decision-Making

• Framing influences public perception by:
  • Setting the agenda and determining which issues receive attention
  • Defining the terms of the debate and the key considerations
  • Shaping the public's understanding of the causes, consequences, and potential solutions to a policy issue
• Frames can mobilize support or opposition for a policy by:
  • Appealing to shared values, beliefs, or identities
  • Creating a sense of urgency or crisis
  • Highlighting the benefits or costs of a proposed solution
• Framing can also influence individual decision-making by:
  • Altering the perceived risks and rewards associated with different policy options
  • Triggering cognitive biases, such as loss aversion or the status quo bias
  • Evoking emotional responses that override rational considerations

Common Frames in Media Coverage

Conflict and Human Interest Frames

• Conflict frame:
  • Emphasizes disagreement and confrontation between opposing sides
  • Often oversimplifies issues and reduces them to a binary choice
  • Can polarize public opinion (e.g., pro-life vs. pro-choice in the abortion debate)
• Human interest frame:
  • Focuses on individual stories and experiences related to a policy issue
  • Can evoke empathy and make the issue more relatable (e.g., highlighting the struggles of a family affected by the opioid epidemic)
  • May distract from the broader context and systemic factors

Economic Consequences and Morality Frames

• Economic consequences frame:
  • Highlights the potential financial costs or benefits of a policy
  • Can resonate with the public's concerns about their own economic well-being (e.g., emphasizing job creation or tax implications of a proposed policy)
  • May neglect other important considerations, such as social or environmental impacts
• Morality frame:
  • Presents a policy issue in terms of moral values or principles
  • Can tap into deeply held beliefs and evoke strong emotional responses (e.g., framing climate change as a moral obligation to protect future generations)
  • May oversimplify complex issues and fuel polarization by casting the debate in terms of right and wrong

Stakeholders and Framing

Politicians and Interest Groups

• Politicians strategically frame issues to:
  • Advance their policy agendas
  • Mobilize support from their constituents
  • Undermine political opponents
  • Often use value-laden language and emotional appeals to resonate with their base (e.g., framing a policy as a matter of national security or social justice)
• Interest groups, such as advocacy organizations and think tanks:
  • Develop and promote frames that align with their goals and values
  • Seek to influence media coverage and public opinion in their favor
  • May provide research, talking points, and resources to journalists and policymakers to shape the framing of an issue (e.g., environmental groups framing fossil fuel subsidies as a barrier to clean energy transition)

Journalists and Media Outlets

• Journalists and media outlets play a crucial role in selecting, amplifying, and challenging frames, with their choices shaped by:
  • Professional norms and values, such as objectivity and newsworthiness
  • Organizational constraints, such as deadlines, resources, and editorial priorities
  • The need to attract and retain audiences in a competitive media landscape
• Media framing can influence public opinion by:
  • Determining which aspects of an issue receive prominence and which are downplayed or omitted
  • Using language, visuals, and narrative structures that resonate with certain audiences or evoke specific responses
  • Providing a platform for certain voices and perspectives while marginalizing others (e.g., giving more coverage to official sources or sensational claims)
• The interaction and competition among politicians, interest groups, and media contribute to the dynamic nature of framing, as frames evolve and shift in response to changing political, social, and media environments

Ethical Implications of Framing

Bias, Sensationalism, and Stereotyping

• Selective framing can lead to biased or incomplete coverage that fails to provide the public with a comprehensive understanding of policy issues, undermining informed decision-making
• Sensationalistic or emotionally manipulative frames may:
  • Prioritize capturing attention over promoting substantive debate
  • Contribute to a polarized and misinformed public discourse (e.g., using fear-mongering or clickbait headlines to drive engagement)
• The use of frames that reinforce stereotypes or stigmatize certain groups can:
  • Perpetuate social inequalities and discrimination
  • Hinder progress on addressing underlying systemic issues (e.g., framing poverty as a result of individual failings rather than structural factors)

Responsibility and Accountability

• Media outlets and journalists have a responsibility to:
  • Be transparent about their framing choices and potential biases
  • Strive for balance, accuracy, and context in their coverage
  • Provide diverse perspectives and challenge dominant frames when necessary
  • Help the public critically evaluate competing frames and make informed decisions
• The public also has a role in:
  • Critically consuming media and recognizing framing techniques
  • Seeking out diverse sources and perspectives to gain a more comprehensive understanding of policy issues
  • Engaging in reflective reasoning and civil dialogue to challenge problematic framing practices and promote a more informed and inclusive public discourse
• Policymakers, regulators, and civil society organizations can also contribute to promoting responsible framing by:
  • Ensuring media plurality and independence
  • Supporting media literacy education and fact-checking initiatives
  • Holding media outlets and other stakeholders accountable for unethical or misleading framing practices