6.2 Media's role in shaping public discourse

Media shapes public discourse by filtering information and setting the agenda. Gatekeepers like editors and algorithms decide what stories to cover, influencing public awareness. This process determines which issues receive attention and how they're framed.

Media ownership concentration impacts viewpoint diversity. A few corporations controlling multiple outlets can limit perspectives in public debate. However, digital media has challenged traditional gatekeeping, enabling individuals to share information directly with the public.

Media Gatekeeping and Access

The Gatekeeping Process

Top images from around the web for The Gatekeeping Process

• 

  Network Gatekeeping Theory - what is it? how can researchers use it? - Network Gatekeeper View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Gatekeeping/Information Control Archives - Network Gatekeeper View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Publication Ethics & Malpractice Statement – Commonwealth Journal of Academic Research (CJAR) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Network Gatekeeping Theory - what is it? how can researchers use it? - Network Gatekeeper View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Gatekeeping/Information Control Archives - Network Gatekeeper View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for The Gatekeeping Process

• 

  Network Gatekeeping Theory - what is it? how can researchers use it? - Network Gatekeeper View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Gatekeeping/Information Control Archives - Network Gatekeeper View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Publication Ethics & Malpractice Statement – Commonwealth Journal of Academic Research (CJAR) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Network Gatekeeping Theory - what is it? how can researchers use it? - Network Gatekeeper View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Gatekeeping/Information Control Archives - Network Gatekeeper View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Gatekeeping filters information for dissemination through various modes of communication (publication, broadcasting, the Internet)
• Gatekeepers in media organizations make editorial decisions about what information to include or exclude from publication
• Traditional gatekeepers include editors, journalists, and producers who decide what stories to cover and how to present information to the public
• In the digital age, algorithms and online platforms also serve gatekeeping functions by curating and personalizing content feeds (Facebook News Feed, Twitter Trending Topics)

Influence on Public Access to Information

• Gatekeeping determines what stories or issues receive coverage, how much prominence they are given, and what sources or perspectives are included
• This selectivity shapes public awareness and perceptions of events and issues
• Factors influencing gatekeeping decisions include:
  • Newsworthiness criteria (timeliness, proximity, impact, prominence, conflict)
  • Organizational constraints (deadlines, space limitations)
  • Individual biases or value judgments of media professionals
• Critics argue gatekeeping can lead to the exclusion of important stories, voices, or viewpoints, particularly those challenging dominant narratives or power structures
  • Contributes to information gaps or "blind spots" in public understanding
• The rise of digital and social media has challenged traditional gatekeeping by enabling individuals to bypass legacy media and directly share information with the public
  • However, new forms of gatekeeping have emerged (algorithmic filtering, content moderation on social platforms)

Media Ownership and Viewpoint Diversity

Media Ownership Concentration

• Media ownership refers to the individuals, corporations, or entities that control media outlets
• Concentration occurs when a small number of owners control a large portion of the media market or have cross-ownership of multiple media platforms
• Mergers, acquisitions, and consolidation in the media industry have led to increased ownership concentration
  • Horizontally across multiple outlets in the same medium
  • Vertically across different stages of production and distribution

Impact on Diversity of Viewpoints

• Critics argue media concentration reduces the diversity of viewpoints in public discourse
  • Limits the range of voices and perspectives that have access to mass media platforms
  • Leads to a narrowing of the scope of public debate and a homogenization of content
• Concentrated ownership may create conflicts of interest that influence editorial decisions and news coverage
  • Media outlets may be less likely to critically cover the activities of their parent corporations or advertisers
• Proponents argue media consolidation can provide economies of scale and resources necessary for high-quality journalism
  • Point to the proliferation of digital outlets and user-generated content as evidence of a more diverse media landscape
• Policies proposed to promote media diversity and limit negative effects of concentration include:
  • Ownership restrictions
  • Antitrust regulations
  • Public media funding
  • Effectiveness and feasibility of these approaches remain debated

Media Agenda Setting and Prioritization

The Agenda-Setting Function

• Agenda setting refers to the media's ability to influence the salience of topics in the public discourse
• By giving more coverage and prominence to certain issues, the media shape what the public perceives as important and worthy of attention
• The media agenda is determined by a combination of factors:
  • News values
  • Organizational priorities
  • Influence of political and economic elites
• The interaction between the media agenda and the public agenda is complex and multidirectional

Impact on Public Priorities and Policy

• Studies show a strong correlation between the issues receiving the most media coverage and those the public identifies as the most important problems facing society
  • Suggests the media play a key role in setting the public agenda
• However, the relationship between media and public priorities is not always direct or immediate
  • The public may not prioritize issues in the same order as the media
  • There can be a lag between media coverage and changes in public opinion
• The agenda-setting function of media has significant implications for public policy and political decision-making
  • Issues receiving sustained media attention are more likely to be addressed by policymakers and become the focus of public debates and activism
• Critics argue the media's agenda-setting power can be misused to distract from important issues or manipulate public opinion in favor of particular interests
  • Call for greater public awareness and media literacy to critically evaluate the sources and framing of information

Media Framing and Public Opinion

Framing and Priming Techniques

• Framing presents and contextualizes information by selecting certain aspects of an issue or event to emphasize while downplaying others
  • Frames influence how the public interprets and evaluates the causes, consequences, and solutions to social problems
• Media frames are shaped by cultural narratives, ideological assumptions, and journalistic norms and routines
  • Common frames include conflict, human interest, morality, and economic consequences
• Priming influences the criteria by which the public evaluates political leaders, issues, or events
  • By repeatedly covering certain topics or attributes, the media make them more salient and accessible in the public's memory

Effects on Public Attitudes and Opinions

• Studies show media framing and priming can have significant effects on public opinion
  • Shape attitudes towards political candidates, policy proposals, and social groups
  • Example: framing a policy debate in terms of "free speech" versus "public safety" can lead to different evaluations of the issue
• The effects of framing and priming are often subtle and cumulative, rather than direct or immediate
  • Interact with individuals' pre-existing beliefs, values, and experiences to shape their interpretations and opinions over time
• Critics argue media framing and priming can be used to manipulate public opinion and manufacture consent for particular agendas
  • Call for greater transparency and accountability in media practices, as well as public education to promote critical thinking and media literacy skills