10.1 Vertical and Horizontal Integration

Media companies use vertical and horizontal integration to expand their reach and control. Vertical integration means owning multiple stages of content creation and distribution. Horizontal integration involves buying competitors to dominate a specific market segment.

These strategies shape the media landscape by influencing what content gets made and how it's distributed. Vertical integration can lead to more synergies but less flexibility. Horizontal integration increases market power but may reduce competition and diversity.

Vertical vs Horizontal Integration in Media

Defining Vertical and Horizontal Integration

Top images from around the web for Defining Vertical and Horizontal Integration

• 

  Levels & Barriers to Supply Chain Integration: a Conceptual Model of Supply Chain Performance ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Supply Chain Integration | Levels & Barriers to Supply Chain Integration View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Levels & Barriers to Supply Chain Integration: a Conceptual Model of Supply Chain Performance ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Supply Chain Integration | Levels & Barriers to Supply Chain Integration View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

Top images from around the web for Defining Vertical and Horizontal Integration

• 

  Levels & Barriers to Supply Chain Integration: a Conceptual Model of Supply Chain Performance ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Supply Chain Integration | Levels & Barriers to Supply Chain Integration View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Levels & Barriers to Supply Chain Integration: a Conceptual Model of Supply Chain Performance ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Supply Chain Integration | Levels & Barriers to Supply Chain Integration View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

• Vertical integration in media is when a company owns and controls multiple stages of the supply chain for producing and distributing content
  • A movie studio also owning the distribution channels and theaters is an example of vertical integration
  • Allows the company to control the entire process from content creation to delivery to the end consumer
• Horizontal integration in media is when a company acquires or merges with other companies at the same stage of the supply chain
  • Aims to increase market share and reduce competition in a specific sector
  • A radio station group buying other stations in the same markets exemplifies horizontal integration
• Key differences between vertical and horizontal integration
  • Vertically integrated companies have more control over the entire content lifecycle from creation to consumption
  • Horizontally integrated companies focus on dominating a specific stage of the media supply chain

Comparing Vertical and Horizontal Integration Strategies

• Vertical integration involves expanding into different stages of the supply chain
  • Requires significant capital investment to acquire or develop capabilities in content production, distribution, and exhibition
  • Allows for greater control over the user experience and customer journey across touchpoints
• Horizontal integration focuses on increasing scale within a specific supply chain stage
  • Often achieved through mergers and acquisitions of direct competitors
  • Enables companies to gain market share, pricing power, and economies of scale within their core competency
• Hybrid approaches combining vertical and horizontal integration are common
  • Media conglomerates often pursue both strategies simultaneously to maximize reach and control
  • Disney acquiring 21st Century Fox is an example of horizontal integration in content production, while launching Disney+ is vertical integration into streaming distribution

Benefits and Drawbacks of Vertical Integration

Advantages of Vertical Integration for Media Companies

• Vertical integration allows media companies to capture more revenue and profits by owning each step in the supply chain
  • Reduces transaction costs and fees that would be paid to third-party distributors or platforms
  • Increases the lifetime value generated from intellectual property assets across a wider range of monetization channels
• Vertically integrated companies can prioritize and coordinate the promotion and distribution of their owned content
  • Cross-promotion across commonly-owned platforms maximizes reach and awareness for priority releases
  • Scheduling and windowing of content releases can be optimized across channels to drive user acquisition and retention
• Ownership of user data and insights across the content lifecycle
  • Vertical integration provides more opportunities to collect first-party consumer data at each touchpoint
  • Viewing history, engagement, and transactions can inform content investment and development decisions
  • Audience data can also be leveraged for targeted advertising and personalized user experiences

Challenges and Risks of Vertical Integration

• High upfront costs to build or buy capabilities across the supply chain
  • Acquiring content studios, distribution infrastructure, and consumer platforms requires significant capital
  • Integrating disparate companies and technologies can lead to operational inefficiencies and culture clashes
  • Opportunity cost of investing in vertical integration over other growth strategies
• Potential for inflexibility and disruption as market conditions evolve
  • Owning legacy platforms and formats can become a liability if consumer preferences shift (decline of linear TV)
  • Vertically integrated companies may be slow to adapt to new technologies and business models
  • Disruption from new entrants can undermine the value of tightly-integrated content and distribution operations
• Vertical integration can lead to creative stagnation and risk aversion
  • Pressure to maximize the value of existing intellectual property may disincentivize original content development
  • Focus on promoting content that fits the company's owned distribution channels, rather than taking creative risks
  • Bureaucratic decision-making processes can hinder the green-lighting of bold or niche projects

Horizontal Integration and Market Competition

Impact of Horizontal Integration on Market Dynamics

• Horizontal mergers and acquisitions reduce the number of independent companies in a market
  • Concentrates power among a smaller number of large players
  • In the extreme, can lead to oligopolies or monopolies if a few giants dominate the sector (Hollywood studios in the Golden Age)
  • Lack of competition can lead to higher prices, lower innovation, and reduced consumer choice
• Horizontally integrated companies gain scale advantages over smaller competitors
  • Economies of scale in content production and licensing deals due to larger volume
  • Ability to spread fixed costs like marketing and technology across a bigger user base
  • More leverage in negotiations with suppliers, talent, and distribution partners
• Potential for collusion and anti-competitive practices increases with market concentration
  • Parallel business practices like windowing, pricing, and licensing terms become easier to coordinate
  • Mega-mergers can create "must-have" bundles of content and services that disadvantage independent players
  • Regulators may block horizontal integration that could enable abuse of market power

Influence of Horizontal Integration on Content Offerings

• Consolidation can lead to homogenization of content as companies seek the broadest appeal
  • Horizontally integrated giants may prioritize franchises and formats with proven track records over niche or risky bets
  • Smaller competitors have less ability to invest in expensive genres like prestige TV and tentpole films
  • Local content, cultural diversity, and alternative viewpoints may be squeezed out of the mainstream
• However, larger content budgets from horizontally integrated players can raise overall production quality
  • Bigger companies can afford top talent both in front of and behind the camera
  • Investments in cutting-edge technology and visual effects become table stakes to compete
  • Global scale enables bigger bets on projects that might be too risky for smaller players
• Horizontal integration can also enable companies to serve specific audience segments across multiple content offerings
  • Bundling of genre-focused streaming services and channels to super-serve fan communities (anime, horror)
  • Aggregation of content assets to deliver culturally-relevant offerings to diverse audiences
  • Curation and cross-promotion of niche content that aligns with company brands and target demographics

Shaping Media Content and Distribution

Vertical Integration's Influence on Content Creation and Availability

• Vertically integrated companies can greenlight content designed to drive synergies across their owned platforms
  • Franchise-building becomes a key imperative to generate value across streaming, merchandising, theme parks, etc.
  • Talent and production teams may be incentivized to develop ideas that fit with corporate brand identities and objectives
  • Data on audience behavior and preferences heavily influences content strategy and investment decisions
• Ownership of distribution platforms incentivizes exclusive content strategies
  • Vertically integrated streamers like Netflix and Disney+ increasingly rely on original and exclusive programming to attract and retain subscribers
  • Licensing content to third-party distributors or exhibitors may be deprioritized to drive users to owned platforms
  • Windowing strategies carefully control the availability of content across sales channels to maximize total revenue
• Potential for conflicts of interest in how content is covered and shared across commonly-owned outlets
  • News and commentary on corporate-owned properties may be influenced by business objectives
  • Favorable reviews, scores, and recommendations can be used to drive awareness and consumption of priority releases
  • Critics and journalists may self-censor to avoid jeopardizing access or relationships with parent companies

Impacts of Horizontal Integration on Industry Power Dynamics

• The market power of horizontally integrated companies allows them to set terms with partners across the value chain
  • Leverage in licensing negotiations with content owners due to the scale of their user base and advertising business
  • Ability to demand more favorable revenue splits and ownership stakes from smaller players
  • Gate-keeping power to determine which content is discoverable and monetizable on their platforms
• Horizontally integrated companies can use their scale to outspend competitors on content and talent
  • Bidding wars for marquee intellectual property and creative talent drive up costs across the industry
  • Smaller competitors may be priced out of the market for premium content and forced to focus on lower-cost genres and formats
  • Power imbalances can be coercive, with dominant players pressuring partners to accept unfavorable deal terms to retain access
• Regulatory scrutiny of horizontal and vertical mergers and acquisitions is increasing
  • Policymakers are concerned about the anti-competitive effects of consolidation on pricing, access, and innovation
  • Behavioral and structural remedies such as divestitures or third-party access requirements may be imposed
  • Antitrust lawsuits seeking to block or unwind major transactions are becoming more common (AT&T-Time Warner)