All Study Guides Media Effects Unit 7
📺 Media Effects Unit 7 – Media and Political CommunicationMedia and political communication shape public opinion and electoral outcomes. From agenda-setting to framing, various theories explain how media influences political perceptions. Historical developments, from radio to social media, have transformed how politicians engage with voters.
Campaign strategies leverage media to control messaging and target voters. Digital platforms enable direct communication but raise concerns about misinformation and privacy. Ethical considerations include journalistic objectivity, media ownership, and responsible reporting on polls and political events.
Key Concepts and Theories
Agenda-setting theory suggests media influences public perception of issue importance by emphasizing certain topics
McCombs and Shaw's 1968 study found strong correlation between media coverage and voter priorities
Framing theory posits media frames shape public understanding of issues by highlighting specific aspects
Episodic frames focus on individual stories while thematic frames emphasize broader context
Priming theory proposes media exposure activates related concepts in viewers' minds, influencing their judgments
Cultivation theory argues long-term exposure to media messages shapes perceptions of social reality
Gerbner's research found heavy TV viewers held exaggerated perceptions of crime and violence
Two-step flow model suggests opinion leaders mediate media influence by interpreting and disseminating messages to their networks
Selective exposure theory contends individuals seek information aligning with their beliefs, avoiding cognitive dissonance
Historical Context
Early 20th century saw rise of mass media (radio, newspapers) as primary sources of political information
FDR's fireside chats exemplified radio's potential for direct communication between leaders and citizens
Television's emergence in 1950s transformed political campaigns, emphasizing candidate image and soundbites
Kennedy-Nixon debates in 1960 highlighted TV's impact, with Kennedy's telegenic appearance influencing viewer perceptions
Watergate scandal in 1970s demonstrated media's watchdog role, leading to increased public skepticism of government
24-hour cable news channels (CNN) in 1980s accelerated news cycle and provided platform for partisan commentary
Internet's rise in 1990s and social media's growth in 2000s decentralized political communication, enabling direct candidate-voter interaction
Media serves as primary conduit for political information, shaping public knowledge and opinions
News coverage of campaigns, policy debates, and government actions influences voter perceptions and decision-making
Horse race coverage focusing on polls and campaign strategies can overshadow substantive issues
Media acts as watchdog, scrutinizing government and exposing wrongdoing (Watergate, Pentagon Papers)
Editorial endorsements and op-eds can sway public opinion, particularly in local races
Debates and interviews provide opportunities to assess candidate qualifications and positions
Format and moderator questions can influence viewer impressions and post-debate narratives
Political advertising allows candidates to control messaging and target specific demographics
Negative ads can be effective but may contribute to voter cynicism and disengagement
Campaign Strategies and Tactics
Message discipline involves staying on-topic and repeating key themes to penetrate media narrative
Microtargeting uses data analytics to identify and reach specific voter segments with tailored messages
Cambridge Analytica's use of psychographic profiling in 2016 US presidential election raised ethical concerns
Opposition research uncovers damaging information about opponents for use in ads and media outreach
Earned media refers to news coverage generated by campaign events, statements, and surrogates
Trump's 2016 campaign garnered extensive earned media through provocative tweets and rallies
Paid media includes TV, radio, print, and digital advertising to promote candidates and attack opponents
Social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter) enable direct communication with voters and rapid response to news cycles
Obama's 2008 campaign successfully leveraged social media for organizing and fundraising
Partisan selective exposure leads individuals to consume media content reinforcing their existing beliefs
Echo chambers and filter bubbles can limit exposure to diverse perspectives and contribute to polarization
Agenda-setting effects are stronger for issues with which individuals have less direct experience
Framing effects are more pronounced when frames resonate with individuals' existing values and predispositions
Politically knowledgeable individuals may be more resistant to framing effects
Priming can influence evaluations of candidates based on media's emphasis of certain issues
Iyengar and Kinder's experiments found priming effects on presidential approval ratings
Interpersonal communication and social networks play key role in shaping opinions, as individuals look to peers for cues
Public opinion polls can exert bandwagon or underdog effects, influencing voter behavior based on perceived candidate viability
Social media has democratized political discourse, allowing citizens to engage directly with candidates and each other
User-generated content (memes, viral videos) can shape campaign narratives and public perceptions
Microtargeting and big data enable campaigns to deliver personalized messages to individual voters
Raises privacy concerns and potential for voter manipulation
Algorithmic filtering and recommendation systems can create ideological silos and reinforce confirmation bias
Misinformation and fake news can spread rapidly online, undermining informed decision-making
2016 US election saw proliferation of false stories, often amplified by bots and foreign actors
Digital platforms have become key battlegrounds for campaign advertising and voter mobilization
Google and Facebook's dominance in online ad market gives them significant influence over political messaging
Cybersecurity threats (hacking, leaks) pose risks to campaigns and election integrity
Russian interference in 2016 US election involved hacking of Democratic National Committee emails
Ethical Considerations
Journalistic objectivity and fairness in covering campaigns and government actions
False balance in pursuit of impartiality can give undue credence to fringe views
Potential for media bias, both in terms of partisan slant and structural biases favoring conflict and novelty
Blurring of news and entertainment, as political coverage increasingly focuses on personalities and spectacle
Satirical shows (Daily Show, Last Week Tonight) have become important sources of news for some viewers
Concentration of media ownership and its impact on diversity of perspectives and local news coverage
Transparency in disclosing conflicts of interest and separating news from opinion content
Responsible reporting on polls, avoiding over-emphasis on horse race narratives
Ethical implications of microtargeting and psychographic profiling, as well as potential for voter suppression
Case Studies and Real-World Examples
1960 Kennedy-Nixon debates and the role of television in shaping voter perceptions
Radio listeners thought Nixon won, while TV viewers favored Kennedy
Watergate scandal and the media's role in exposing government corruption
Washington Post's dogged reporting led to Nixon's resignation
1988 Willie Horton ad and the use of racial appeals in political advertising
Bush campaign's attack ad featuring black convict was widely criticized for playing on racial stereotypes
2008 Obama campaign's groundbreaking use of social media and grassroots organizing
MyBarackObama.com platform empowered supporters to create events and raise funds
2016 US presidential election and the impact of fake news, foreign interference, and microtargeting
Trump campaign's use of Cambridge Analytica's psychographic targeting sparked controversy
2020 US presidential election and the role of mail-in voting and misinformation amid COVID-19 pandemic
Trump's false claims of voter fraud undermined public confidence in election integrity