4.1 Reporter's privilege and confidential sources

Reporter's privilege is a legal protection allowing journalists to keep sources confidential. It's based on the First Amendment but varies by jurisdiction. Some states have strong shield laws, while others offer little protection. This impacts how reporters gather sensitive information.

Confidential sources are crucial for investigative journalism, exposing stories like Watergate and government surveillance. However, this privilege isn't absolute. Courts may compel journalists to reveal sources in criminal cases or for national security reasons, balancing press freedom with other interests.

Reporter's Privilege: Concept and Basis

Legal Protection and First Amendment Roots

Top images from around the web for Legal Protection and First Amendment Roots

• 

  Freedom of the Press Foundation - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Freedom of the Press 8 - Qualified Press Privilege - Redoubt News View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Freedom of the press is not the same as freedom of expression View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Freedom of the Press Foundation - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Freedom of the Press 8 - Qualified Press Privilege - Redoubt News View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Legal Protection and First Amendment Roots

• 

  Freedom of the Press Foundation - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Freedom of the Press 8 - Qualified Press Privilege - Redoubt News View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Freedom of the press is not the same as freedom of expression View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Freedom of the Press Foundation - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Freedom of the Press 8 - Qualified Press Privilege - Redoubt News View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Reporter's privilege is a legal protection that allows journalists to refuse to reveal their confidential sources in court or to law enforcement
• The legal basis for reporter's privilege is rooted in the First Amendment's freedom of the press, as compelling journalists to reveal sources could have a chilling effect on the free flow of information

Variations in Privilege Across Jurisdictions

• Reporter's privilege is not absolute and varies by jurisdiction, with some states having shield laws that provide statutory protection, while others rely on court decisions or have no explicit protection
• In Branzburg v. Hayes (1972), the Supreme Court ruled that journalists do not have a constitutional right to refuse to testify before a grand jury, but the decision was narrow and left room for lower courts to recognize a qualified privilege
• Some states (New York, California) have strong shield laws that provide broad protection for journalists, while others (Wyoming) have no shield law at all
• Federal courts have recognized a qualified reporter's privilege based on the First Amendment, but the scope and strength of that privilege varies by circuit

Importance of Confidential Sources

Role in Investigative Journalism

• Confidential sources are individuals who provide information to journalists on the condition that their identity remains anonymous, often due to fear of retribution or desire to protect their privacy
• Confidential sources play a crucial role in investigative journalism, as they can provide valuable information about wrongdoing, corruption, or other matters of public interest that might not come to light otherwise
• Without the ability to protect confidential sources, journalists argue that the public would be deprived of important information and that the watchdog role of the press would be undermined

High-Profile Examples

• Examples of major stories that relied on confidential sources include the Watergate scandal (Deep Throat), the Pentagon Papers (Daniel Ellsberg), and the Edward Snowden leaks
• In the Watergate scandal, Deep Throat provided key information to Washington Post reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein that helped uncover the Nixon administration's involvement in the break-in and cover-up
• The Pentagon Papers, leaked by Daniel Ellsberg, revealed the true history of U.S. involvement in Vietnam and exposed government deception about the war
• Edward Snowden's leaks to journalists Glenn Greenwald and Laura Poitras exposed the extent of NSA surveillance programs and sparked a global debate about privacy and national security

Limitations and Exceptions to Privilege

Compelling Need and Alternate Means

• Courts have recognized several limitations and exceptions to reporter's privilege, particularly when there is a compelling need for the information and it cannot be obtained through other means
• In criminal cases, journalists may be compelled to testify if their information is deemed essential to a defendant's fair trial rights or if it relates to a crime they witnessed
• In civil cases, courts often apply a balancing test, weighing the importance of the information to the case against the potential harm to the journalist's ability to gather news

National Security and Other Exceptions

• National security concerns can also override reporter's privilege, as in the case of New York Times reporter Judith Miller, who was jailed for refusing to reveal her source in the Valerie Plame CIA leak investigation
• Some shield laws contain exceptions for cases involving imminent threat of bodily harm or death, or where a journalist is believed to have committed a crime
• In the Valerie Plame case, Miller spent 85 days in jail for contempt of court before agreeing to testify after her source, Scooter Libby, released her from her promise of confidentiality
• In 2013, a Colorado judge ordered Fox News reporter Jana Winter to reveal her sources for a story about the Aurora movie theater shooter, finding that the information was crucial to the defendant's case and could not be obtained elsewhere

Ethical Considerations of Confidential Sources

Weighing Public Interest and Potential Harm

• Journalists must weigh the public interest value of the information provided by a confidential source against the potential harm or legal risks of using such sources
• Granting confidentiality to a source is a serious commitment that journalists should not make lightly, as breaking that promise can damage trust and credibility
• Journalists should carefully consider whether the information is truly newsworthy and whether the source's motives for seeking anonymity are valid

Verification and Transparency

• Journalists should strive to independently verify information provided by confidential sources and should not rely solely on anonymous sourcing, particularly for sensitive or controversial stories
• News organizations should have clear policies and guidelines for the use of confidential sources, including approval processes and standards for when and how to grant anonymity
• Journalists should be transparent with readers about their use of confidential sources, explaining why anonymity was granted and what steps were taken to verify the information
• For example, The Washington Post's policy requires reporters to get approval from a top editor before granting anonymity and to disclose to readers the source's reasons for seeking anonymity and the source's reliability