12.1 Ethical principles in public health practice

Public health ethics tackles the moral challenges of balancing individual rights with collective well-being. It's about making tough choices that impact entire communities, guided by principles like respect, fairness, and doing no harm.

These ethical principles shape how public health pros make decisions. They help navigate tricky situations, like when to limit personal freedoms during a pandemic or how to fairly distribute limited healthcare resources.

Core Ethical Principles in Public Health

Fundamental Principles

Top images from around the web for Fundamental Principles

• 

  Frontiers | Putting Public Health Ethics into Practice: A Systematic Framework | Public Health View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Teaching seven principles for public health ethics: towards a curriculum for a short course on ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Ethical Dimensions of Public Health Actions and Policies With Special Focus on COVID-19 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Putting Public Health Ethics into Practice: A Systematic Framework | Public Health View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Teaching seven principles for public health ethics: towards a curriculum for a short course on ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Fundamental Principles

• 

  Frontiers | Putting Public Health Ethics into Practice: A Systematic Framework | Public Health View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Teaching seven principles for public health ethics: towards a curriculum for a short course on ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Ethical Dimensions of Public Health Actions and Policies With Special Focus on COVID-19 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Putting Public Health Ethics into Practice: A Systematic Framework | Public Health View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Teaching seven principles for public health ethics: towards a curriculum for a short course on ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Public health ethics applies moral reasoning to public health issues, considering both individual rights and the collective good
• The principle of respect for persons acknowledges individual autonomy and the right to make informed decisions about one's health (informed consent)
• The principle of beneficence requires public health professionals to act in ways that promote the well-being and best interests of individuals and communities (vaccination programs)
• The principle of non-maleficence obligates public health professionals to avoid causing harm or injury to individuals or populations (minimizing adverse effects of interventions)
• The principle of justice ensures fair and equitable distribution of public health resources, benefits, and burdens across all segments of society (access to healthcare)

Transparency and Accountability

• Transparency and accountability are essential principles that promote trust and credibility in public health decision-making and interventions
  • Transparency involves openly communicating the rationale, evidence, and processes behind public health decisions and actions (public reporting of disease outbreaks)
  • Accountability means being responsible for the consequences of public health decisions and actions and being willing to justify them based on ethical principles and values (independent oversight and review)
• Engaging stakeholders and the public in decision-making processes can enhance transparency and accountability (community advisory boards)
• Regularly evaluating and reporting on the effectiveness and impact of public health interventions is crucial for maintaining public trust and confidence (annual performance reports)

Ethical Dilemmas in Public Health

Ethical Decision-Making Approaches

• Ethical dilemmas in public health arise when there are conflicting moral obligations or principles, requiring a careful balancing of competing values (resource allocation during pandemics)
• The utilitarian approach to ethical decision-making focuses on maximizing overall benefit and minimizing harm for the greatest number of people (implementing cost-effective interventions with broad population impact)
• The deontological approach emphasizes adherence to moral rules and duties, such as respect for individual rights and autonomy, regardless of consequences (protecting patient confidentiality)
• The principlist approach seeks to balance and apply the core principles of respect for persons, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice in ethical decision-making (weighing risks and benefits of public health research)
• Casuistry involves the analysis of similar cases and precedents to guide ethical decision-making in specific situations (drawing on past experiences with disease outbreaks)

Ethical Decision-Making Frameworks

• Ethical decision-making frameworks, such as the Public Health Code of Ethics, provide structured guidance for navigating complex ethical dilemmas in public health practice
  • These frameworks typically involve identifying the ethical issues at stake, gathering relevant information, considering alternative courses of action, and justifying decisions based on ethical principles and values
• The Public Health Leadership Society's "Principles of the Ethical Practice of Public Health" offers a set of 12 principles to guide ethical decision-making (addressing the fundamental causes of disease and requirements for health)
• The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has developed an ethical framework for public health decision-making during emergency responses (PHEPR Ethics Framework)
• Engaging diverse stakeholders, including community members, in ethical decision-making processes can help ensure that decisions are inclusive, transparent, and responsive to local needs and values (community ethics committees)

Individual Rights vs Collective Good

Balancing Competing Interests

• Public health interventions often involve trade-offs between individual rights and the collective good, requiring careful consideration of competing values and interests
• Individual rights, such as personal autonomy, privacy, and freedom of choice, are fundamental values that should be respected in public health practice (right to refuse treatment)
• The collective good refers to the health and well-being of the population as a whole, which may sometimes necessitate limiting individual rights for the greater benefit of society (mandatory quarantine during outbreaks)
• The harm principle, developed by John Stuart Mill, suggests that individual liberty can be justifiably limited to prevent harm to others (restricting smoking in public places)
• The least restrictive alternative principle states that public health interventions should use the least intrusive means necessary to achieve legitimate public health goals (voluntary social distancing before mandating lockdowns)

Ensuring Fairness and Proportionality

• Proportionality requires that the benefits of public health interventions outweigh the infringement on individual rights and that any limitations on liberty are proportional to the public health threat (closing schools during severe influenza outbreaks)
• Decisions to limit individual rights should be based on scientific evidence, not unfounded fears or stereotypes (avoiding travel bans based on nationality during global health emergencies)
• Public health interventions should be implemented fairly and equitably, without discrimination or undue burden on particular groups or individuals (ensuring equal access to vaccines)
• Transparency and public engagement are essential for building trust and ensuring that decisions about balancing individual rights and the collective good are made through a fair and inclusive process (public hearings and comment periods)
• Regular review and adjustment of public health measures are necessary to ensure they remain proportional and justified as circumstances change (adapting social distancing guidelines based on local transmission levels)

Cultural Competence in Public Health

Understanding and Respecting Diversity

• Cultural competence is the ability to effectively interact with and serve diverse populations, taking into account their unique beliefs, values, and practices
• Ethical public health practice requires an understanding and respect for the cultural, social, and historical contexts that shape individuals' and communities' health beliefs, behaviors, and outcomes (recognizing traditional healing practices)
• Developing cultural knowledge, skills, and awareness is essential for building trust and rapport with diverse communities (learning about cultural norms and communication styles)
• Providing language assistance services and culturally appropriate health education materials can help ensure effective communication and understanding (multilingual health promotion campaigns)
• Recruiting and training a diverse public health workforce that reflects the communities served can enhance cultural competence and responsiveness (community health workers)

Promoting Cultural Humility and Equity

• Cultural humility involves a lifelong commitment to self-reflection, self-critique, and learning from others to address power imbalances and promote equity in public health practice
• Acknowledging and addressing implicit biases and structural inequities that contribute to health disparities is crucial for advancing health equity (examining institutional policies and practices)
• Culturally competent and humble public health practice involves ongoing community engagement, partnership, and collaboration to ensure that interventions are culturally appropriate and responsive (participatory research and planning)
• Engaging community leaders, organizations, and members as equal partners in public health decision-making and implementation can foster trust, ownership, and sustainability (community advisory boards)
• Addressing health disparities and promoting health equity require a commitment to cultural competence and humility, as well as a recognition of the structural and systemic factors that contribute to health inequities (advocating for policies that address social determinants of health)