Corporate finance decisions shape a firm's value through strategic resource allocation and risk management. Understanding key principles like time value of money and agency theory helps managers make informed choices that balance shareholder interests with long-term growth.
Capital structure , dividend policy, and investment evaluation methods are crucial tools in maximizing firm value. By optimizing the mix of debt and equity, managing dividend payouts, and using NPV and IRR to assess projects, companies can enhance their financial performance and market position.
Corporate Finance Principles and Firm Value
Maximizing Shareholder Value and Time Value of Money
Top images from around the web for Maximizing Shareholder Value and Time Value of Money Chapter 12.1 – Time Value of Money – Agribusiness Management 101 View original
Is this image relevant?
Keziana Financial Modelling: Shareholder Value Map - Deloitte View original
Is this image relevant?
Chapter 12.1 – Time Value of Money – Agribusiness Management 101 View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Maximizing Shareholder Value and Time Value of Money Chapter 12.1 – Time Value of Money – Agribusiness Management 101 View original
Is this image relevant?
Keziana Financial Modelling: Shareholder Value Map - Deloitte View original
Is this image relevant?
Chapter 12.1 – Time Value of Money – Agribusiness Management 101 View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Corporate finance maximizes shareholder value through effective financial decision-making and resource allocation within a firm
Time value of money principle states a dollar today holds more worth than a dollar in the future due to its potential earning capacity
Example: 1 , 000 i n v e s t e d t o d a y a t 5 1,000 invested today at 5% interest will be worth 1 , 000 in v es t e d t o d a y a t 5 1,050 in one year
Risk-return tradeoff associates higher potential returns with greater risk
Example: Investing in a tech startup (high risk, high potential return) vs. government bonds (low risk, low return)
Agency Theory and Market Efficiency
Agency theory examines conflicts of interest between shareholders (principals) and managers (agents), impacting corporate financial decisions
Example: Managers may prioritize short-term profits to boost their bonuses, potentially harming long-term shareholder value
Market efficiency hypothesis suggests stock prices reflect all available information, influencing firm financial decisions and market communication
Weak form: Past price information
Semi-strong form: All publicly available information
Strong form: All information, including insider information
Capital Budgeting and Corporate Governance
Capital budgeting evaluates and selects long-term investment projects maximizing firm value
Steps include:
Identify investment opportunities
Estimate cash flows
Assess risk
Calculate project value
Make investment decision
Corporate governance structures align management decisions with shareholder interests, enhancing firm value
Key components:
Board of directors
Shareholder rights
Transparency and disclosure
Executive compensation policies
Capital Structure Decisions
Modigliani-Miller Theorem and Trade-off Theory
Capital structure combines debt and equity to finance company operations and investments
Modigliani-Miller theorem provides theoretical foundation for capital structure decisions under perfect market conditions
Key assumptions:
No taxes
No transaction costs
No bankruptcy costs
Perfect information
Trade-off theory balances tax benefits of debt against costs of financial distress and bankruptcy
Example: A company might target a 40% debt-to-equity ratio to optimize tax benefits while managing bankruptcy risk
Pecking Order Theory and Cost of Capital
Pecking order theory suggests firms prefer internal financing over external, and debt over equity for external financing
Financing hierarchy:
Internal funds
Debt
Equity
Weighted average cost of capital (WACC) represents overall financing cost, incorporating debt and equity costs
WACC formula: W A C C = ( E / V ∗ R e ) + ( D / V ∗ R d ∗ ( 1 − T ) ) WACC = (E/V * Re) + (D/V * Rd * (1-T)) W A CC = ( E / V ∗ R e ) + ( D / V ∗ R d ∗ ( 1 − T ))
E = Market value of equity
D = Market value of debt
V = Total market value (E + D)
Re = Cost of equity
Rd = Cost of debt
T = Corporate tax rate
Financial Leverage and Operating Leverage
Financial leverage measures extent of fixed-income securities use (debt, preferred equity) to finance assets
Debt-to-equity ratio: Total Debt / Total Equity
Degree of operating leverage (DOL) and degree of financial leverage (DFL) affect earnings volatility and risk profile
DOL formula: D O L = % C h a n g e i n E B I T / % C h a n g e i n S a l e s DOL = \% Change in EBIT / \% Change in Sales D O L = % C han g e in EB I T /% C han g e in S a l es
DFL formula: D F L = % C h a n g e i n E P S / % C h a n g e i n E B I T DFL = \% Change in EPS / \% Change in EBIT D F L = % C han g e in EPS /% C han g e in EB I T
Example: A company with high fixed costs (high DOL) and high debt (high DFL) will experience greater earnings volatility
Dividend Policy and Firm Value
Dividend Theories and Signaling
Dividend policy determines earnings distribution to shareholders
Dividend irrelevance theory (Miller and Modigliani) suggests dividend policy doesn't affect firm value under perfect market conditions
Bird-in-hand theory argues investors prefer certainty of dividend payments over potential future capital gains
Tax preference theory posits investors may prefer capital gains to dividends due to more favorable tax treatment (capital gains tax vs. income tax)
Signaling theory suggests dividend policy changes convey information about firm's future prospects
Example: A dividend increase might signal management's confidence in future earnings
Share Repurchases and Residual Dividend Policy
Share repurchases offer alternative to cash dividends, providing tax advantages and flexibility in returning cash to shareholders
Methods:
Open market repurchases
Tender offers
Dutch auctions
Residual dividend policy determines payments based on funds remaining after financing all profitable investment opportunities
Steps:
Determine optimal capital budget
Identify target capital structure
Use internal financing as much as possible
Pay dividends from residual funds
Investment Project Evaluation: NPV vs IRR
Net Present Value (NPV) Method
NPV calculates present value of all future cash flows minus initial investment
NPV formula: N P V = ∑ t = 1 n C F t ( 1 + r ) t − C F 0 NPV = \sum_{t=1}^{n} \frac{CF_t}{(1+r)^t} - CF_0 NP V = ∑ t = 1 n ( 1 + r ) t C F t − C F 0
CFt = Cash flow at time t
r = Discount rate
CF0 = Initial investment
NPV decision rule accepts projects with positive NPV, increasing firm value
Example: Project A with NPV of 100 , 000 s h o u l d b e a c c e p t e d , w h i l e P r o j e c t B w i t h N P V o f − 100,000 should be accepted, while Project B with NPV of - 100 , 000 s h o u l d b e a cce pt e d , w hi l e P ro j ec tBw i t h NP V o f − 50,000 should be rejected
Internal Rate of Return (IRR) Method
IRR calculates discount rate making NPV of project equal to zero
IRR formula: 0 = ∑ t = 1 n C F t ( 1 + I R R ) t − C F 0 0 = \sum_{t=1}^{n} \frac{CF_t}{(1+IRR)^t} - CF_0 0 = ∑ t = 1 n ( 1 + I RR ) t C F t − C F 0
IRR decision rule suggests accepting projects with IRR greater than required rate of return or cost of capital
Example: If cost of capital is 10%, a project with IRR of 15% should be accepted
Comparing NPV and IRR
NPV and IRR may lead to conflicting decisions for mutually exclusive projects or projects with non-conventional cash flows
Example: Project X (NPV: 1 , 000 , 000 , I R R : 20 1,000,000, IRR: 20%) vs. Project Y (NPV: 1 , 000 , 000 , I RR : 20 1,200,000, IRR: 18%)
Modified internal rate of return (MIRR) addresses limitations of traditional IRR by assuming reinvestment at cost of capital
MIRR formula: M I R R = F V ( positive cash flows ) P V ( negative cash flows ) n − 1 MIRR = \sqrt[n]{\frac{FV(\text{positive cash flows})}{PV(\text{negative cash flows})}} - 1 M I RR = n P V ( negative cash flows ) F V ( positive cash flows ) − 1
Sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis assess impact of key variable changes on NPV and IRR calculations
Example: Analyzing project NPV under optimistic, most likely, and pessimistic scenarios for sales growth