12.2 Claude Lévi-Strauss and structural anthropology

Claude Lévi-Strauss revolutionized anthropology by applying linguistic concepts to cultural analysis. His structural approach sought universal patterns in human thought and behavior, influencing how we understand myths and cultural narratives.

Lévi-Strauss's key ideas include binary oppositions, mythemes, and synchronic analysis. His work on mythology revealed common structures across cultures, challenging traditional views on the relationship between "primitive" and "modern" societies.

Origins of structural anthropology

• Structural anthropology emerged as a theoretical framework in the mid-20th century, revolutionizing the study of human cultures and societies
• This approach applied linguistic concepts to anthropological research, seeking to uncover universal patterns in human thought and behavior
• Structural anthropology significantly influenced the field of Myth and Literature by providing new tools for analyzing cultural narratives and symbolic systems

Influences on Lévi-Strauss

Top images from around the web for Influences on Lévi-Strauss

• 

  Category:Marcel Mauss - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Claude Lévi-Strauss View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Emile Durkheim View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Category:Marcel Mauss - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Claude Lévi-Strauss View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Influences on Lévi-Strauss

• 

  Category:Marcel Mauss - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Claude Lévi-Strauss View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Emile Durkheim View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Category:Marcel Mauss - Wikimedia Commons View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Claude Lévi-Strauss View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Marcel Mauss's concept of "total social facts" shaped Lévi-Strauss's holistic view of culture
• Roman Jakobson's phonological theories inspired Lévi-Strauss to seek underlying structures in cultural phenomena
• Franz Boas's emphasis on cultural relativism influenced Lévi-Strauss's approach to studying diverse societies
• Émile Durkheim's ideas on social structures provided a foundation for Lévi-Strauss's structural analysis

Saussurean linguistics connection

• Ferdinand de Saussure's distinction between langue (language system) and parole (individual speech acts) informed Lévi-Strauss's approach
• Lévi-Strauss applied Saussure's concept of binary oppositions to cultural analysis
• The idea of signs as arbitrary and relational in Saussurean linguistics influenced Lévi-Strauss's view of cultural symbols
• Lévi-Strauss extended Saussure's synchronic approach to language to the study of social and cultural phenomena

Key concepts in structuralism

• Structuralism in anthropology focuses on uncovering hidden patterns and relationships within cultural systems
• This approach emphasizes the importance of studying cultural elements in relation to one another rather than in isolation
• Structuralism has had a profound impact on the analysis of myths and literature by revealing underlying structures and universal themes

Binary oppositions

• Fundamental to structuralist thought, binary oppositions are pairs of contrasting concepts (nature/culture, raw/cooked)
• These oppositions serve as building blocks for more complex cultural systems and narratives
• In myth analysis, binary oppositions help reveal underlying tensions and resolutions within stories
• Lévi-Strauss argued that binary oppositions reflect fundamental structures of human thought across cultures

Mythemes and mythic structures

• Mythemes are the smallest units of meaning within a myth, analogous to phonemes in linguistics
• These basic elements combine to form larger mythic structures and narratives
• Lévi-Strauss identified recurring mythemes across different cultures, suggesting universal patterns in mythology
• Analysis of mythemes allows for the comparison of seemingly disparate myths and reveals underlying structural similarities

Synchronic vs diachronic analysis

• Synchronic analysis examines cultural elements at a specific point in time, focusing on relationships and structures
• Diachronic analysis studies how cultural elements change over time, tracing historical developments
• Lévi-Strauss emphasized synchronic analysis in his structural approach to anthropology and myth
• This approach allows for the identification of persistent structures in myths and cultural systems across different time periods

Lévi-Strauss's approach to myth

• Lévi-Strauss revolutionized the study of mythology by applying structural analysis to diverse cultural narratives
• His approach sought to uncover universal patterns and structures underlying seemingly disparate myths
• This method had a significant impact on literary criticism and the interpretation of mythological texts in various disciplines

Universal patterns in mythology

• Lévi-Strauss identified recurring themes and structures across myths from different cultures
• He argued that these patterns reflect fundamental aspects of human cognition and social organization
• Common motifs include creation stories, hero quests, and transformation narratives
• Lévi-Strauss's work revealed deep connections between myths previously considered unrelated

Myth as language

• Lévi-Strauss viewed myths as a form of language with their own grammar and syntax
• He argued that myths communicate meaning through their structure rather than just their content
• This approach allowed for the analysis of myths as complex systems of signs and symbols
• Lévi-Strauss's concept of myth as language opened new avenues for interpreting cultural narratives

Structural analysis of narratives

• Lévi-Strauss broke down myths into constituent parts (mythemes) to reveal underlying structures
• He arranged these elements into paradigmatic and syntagmatic relationships
• This method allowed for the comparison of myths across cultures and the identification of common structural features
• Structural analysis of narratives has been applied to various forms of literature beyond traditional myths

Major works and contributions

• Lévi-Strauss produced several influential works that shaped the field of structural anthropology
• His writings had a profound impact on various disciplines, including literary criticism, philosophy, and cultural studies
• These major works introduced key concepts and methodologies that continue to influence contemporary scholarship

Tristes Tropiques

• Published in 1955, this autobiographical work blends ethnography, philosophy, and travel writing
• Lévi-Strauss reflects on his fieldwork experiences among indigenous peoples in Brazil
• The book critiques Western ethnocentrism and explores the relationship between "primitive" and "civilized" societies
• Tristes Tropiques introduced many readers to structural anthropology and its implications for understanding cultural diversity

The Raw and the Cooked

• First volume of Lévi-Strauss's monumental Mythologiques series, published in 1964
• Analyzes myths from indigenous South American cultures using structural methods
• Explores the opposition between nature (raw) and culture (cooked) as a fundamental mythic structure
• Demonstrates how seemingly unrelated myths can be understood as transformations of a common underlying structure

The Savage Mind

• Published in 1962, this work challenges the distinction between "primitive" and "modern" thought
• Lévi-Strauss argues that all human minds operate using similar structural principles
• Introduces the concept of "bricolage" to describe how cultures creatively adapt and recombine existing elements
• The Savage Mind had a significant impact on postcolonial theory and the reevaluation of non-Western knowledge systems

Critique of Lévi-Strauss's theories

• Lévi-Strauss's structural approach faced various criticisms from scholars in anthropology and related fields
• These critiques led to the development of new theoretical perspectives and methodologies in cultural analysis
• The debate surrounding structuralism has contributed to a more nuanced understanding of culture and meaning-making processes

Limitations of structuralism

• Critics argued that structuralism oversimplifies complex cultural phenomena
• The focus on universal structures may overlook important historical and contextual factors
• Some scholars questioned the empirical basis of Lévi-Strauss's claims about universal mental structures
• The structural approach has been criticized for neglecting individual agency and cultural change

Post-structuralist responses

• Post-structuralist thinkers challenged the idea of fixed, universal structures underlying culture
• Jacques Derrida's concept of "deconstruction" questioned the stability of binary oppositions central to structuralism
• Michel Foucault emphasized the role of power relations in shaping cultural structures and knowledge
• Post-structuralism led to more fluid and context-sensitive approaches to cultural analysis

Impact on literary criticism

• Structural anthropology significantly influenced the field of literary criticism, providing new tools for textual analysis
• Lévi-Strauss's ideas inspired scholars to seek underlying patterns and structures in literary works
• This approach led to new insights into the relationship between literature, myth, and cultural systems

Structural analysis in literature

• Literary critics applied Lévi-Strauss's methods to analyze narrative structures in various genres
• This approach revealed common patterns and themes across different literary traditions
• Structural analysis helped identify deep structures underlying surface-level differences in texts
• Critics used binary oppositions to explore tensions and resolutions within literary works

Influence on narratology

• Structuralist approaches contributed to the development of narratology as a field of study
• Scholars like A.J. Greimas and Roland Barthes applied structural methods to analyze narrative functions
• Narratology examines the underlying structures and patterns in storytelling across different media
• Lévi-Strauss's work on myth influenced theories of plot structure and character functions in literature

Legacy in anthropology and beyond

• Lévi-Strauss's structural anthropology has had a lasting impact on various academic disciplines
• While pure structuralism has declined, many of its insights continue to inform contemporary research
• The legacy of structural anthropology can be seen in diverse fields, from cultural studies to cognitive science

Structuralism in cultural studies

• Cultural studies adopted and adapted structuralist methods for analyzing popular culture and media
• Scholars use structural approaches to examine underlying patterns in cultural production and consumption
• Structuralist-inspired analysis has been applied to film, television, advertising, and other forms of mass media
• The concept of cultural codes, derived from structuralism, remains influential in media and communication studies

Contemporary applications of Lévi-Strauss

• Cognitive anthropology draws on Lévi-Strauss's ideas about universal mental structures
• Environmental anthropology uses structuralist approaches to analyze human-nature relationships
• Digital humanities researchers apply structural methods to large-scale textual analysis
• Lévi-Strauss's work on kinship systems continues to influence studies of family and social organization