11.1 Land rights and sacred site protection

Land rights and sacred site protection are fundamental to Native American history and contemporary struggles. These issues reflect the complex relationship between Indigenous peoples and settler governments, highlighting the ongoing tension between tribal sovereignty and federal authority.

The evolution of land rights, from pre-colonial concepts to modern legal battles, shapes current debates on tribal sovereignty and cultural preservation. Sacred site protection efforts underscore the deep spiritual connection many Native communities maintain with their ancestral lands, often clashing with Western land use practices.

Origins of land rights

• Land rights in Native American history form the foundation for understanding tribal sovereignty and cultural preservation
• The evolution of land rights reflects the complex relationship between Indigenous peoples and settler colonial governments
• Examining the origins of land rights provides crucial context for contemporary legal and social issues facing Native communities

Pre-colonial land concepts

Top images from around the web for Pre-colonial land concepts

• 

  Pre-Columbian era - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Building an Indigenous Traditional Ecological Knowledge Initiative at a Research University ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Indigenous Ecological Knowledge – Atlas of Living Australia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Pre-Columbian era - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Building an Indigenous Traditional Ecological Knowledge Initiative at a Research University ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Pre-colonial land concepts

• 

  Pre-Columbian era - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Building an Indigenous Traditional Ecological Knowledge Initiative at a Research University ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Indigenous Ecological Knowledge – Atlas of Living Australia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Pre-Columbian era - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Building an Indigenous Traditional Ecological Knowledge Initiative at a Research University ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Indigenous land tenure systems varied widely among tribes but often emphasized communal ownership and stewardship
• Many tribes practiced sustainable land management techniques based on traditional ecological knowledge
• Land was often viewed as a sacred entity, not a commodity to be bought or sold
• Territorial boundaries were fluid and often based on seasonal migration patterns or shared hunting grounds
• Some tribes had complex systems of usufruct rights, allowing different groups to access resources on the same land

European colonization impact

• Introduced the concept of individual land ownership and property rights, conflicting with Indigenous worldviews
• Implemented the Doctrine of Discovery, justifying European claims to Native lands
• Led to widespread displacement of Native peoples through forced relocation and violence
• Resulted in significant loss of traditional hunting and gathering territories
• Disrupted Indigenous economies and social structures tied to specific landscapes

Treaty-making process

• Formal agreements between tribal nations and the U.S. government, often under duress or deception
• Typically involved ceding large tracts of land in exchange for reserved rights and federal protections
• Many treaties included provisions for hunting, fishing, and gathering rights on ceded territories
• Often poorly translated or deliberately misinterpreted, leading to future disputes
• U.S. government frequently violated treaty terms, eroding trust and leading to further land loss

Federal Indian law

• Federal Indian law encompasses the complex body of legislation, court decisions, and policies governing Native American rights
• This legal framework has evolved significantly since the founding of the United States, often reflecting changing attitudes towards Indigenous peoples
• Understanding Federal Indian law is crucial for interpreting contemporary land rights issues and tribal sovereignty claims

Marshall Trilogy cases

• Three Supreme Court cases decided by Chief Justice John Marshall in the early 19th century
• Johnson v. M'Intosh (1823) established the Doctrine of Discovery in U.S. law, limiting tribal land rights
• Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831) defined tribes as "domestic dependent nations" under federal protection
• Worcester v. Georgia (1832) recognized tribal sovereignty and limited state jurisdiction on tribal lands
• These cases laid the foundation for the federal-tribal trust relationship and continue to influence Indian law today

Plenary power doctrine

• Asserts that Congress has absolute authority over Indian affairs, derived from the Constitution
• Allows Congress to unilaterally abrogate treaties and alter tribal rights without consent
• Has been used to justify federal actions detrimental to tribal interests (forced relocation, termination policy)
• Criticized by many legal scholars as inconsistent with principles of tribal sovereignty
• Recent Supreme Court decisions have begun to question the extent of plenary power

Trust relationship concept

• Defines the U.S. government as a trustee responsible for protecting tribal assets and rights
• Originated from the Marshall Trilogy cases and subsequent legislation
• Imposes fiduciary duties on the federal government to manage tribal resources responsibly
• Includes obligations to provide services (healthcare, education) and protect tribal sovereignty
• Has been interpreted differently over time, leading to debates about its scope and enforcement

Reservation system

• The reservation system represents a pivotal shift in Native American land rights and federal policy
• Established as a means of containing and controlling Indigenous populations while opening up lands for settler expansion
• The impacts of the reservation system continue to shape contemporary Native American communities and their relationship with the federal government

Establishment and purpose

• Began in earnest with the Indian Appropriations Act of 1851, formalizing the reservation policy
• Intended to confine Native peoples to designated areas, often far from their traditional lands
• Aimed to "civilize" Native Americans through forced assimilation and agricultural pursuits
• Resulted in dramatic reduction of tribal land bases and access to traditional resources
• Often located on less desirable lands with limited economic potential

Allotment era effects

• Initiated by the General Allotment Act (Dawes Act) of 1887
• Divided communal tribal lands into individual parcels assigned to tribal members
• "Surplus" lands were opened to non-Native settlement, leading to massive land loss
• Disrupted traditional governance structures and communal land management practices
• By 1934, Native Americans had lost about two-thirds of their land base (90 million acres)

Indian Reorganization Act

• Passed in 1934 as part of the "Indian New Deal" under the Roosevelt administration
• Ended the allotment policy and prohibited further sale of Native lands
• Encouraged tribes to adopt written constitutions and establish formal tribal governments
• Authorized the Secretary of Interior to take land into trust for tribes
• Aimed to promote tribal self-governance and economic development on reservations

Sacred site protection

• Sacred site protection is a critical aspect of preserving Native American cultural heritage and religious freedom
• Efforts to protect sacred sites often involve complex legal battles and negotiations with federal agencies
• The struggle for sacred site protection highlights the ongoing tension between Indigenous spiritual practices and Western concepts of land use

Religious freedom laws

• American Indian Religious Freedom Act (AIRFA) of 1978 affirmed Native Americans' right to practice traditional religions
• Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) of 1993 provided additional protections for religious practices
• These laws require federal agencies to consider impacts on Native American religious practices in decision-making
• However, enforcement has been inconsistent, leading to continued threats to sacred sites
• Some tribes have successfully used these laws to protect specific sites (Medicine Wheel in Wyoming)

National Historic Preservation Act

• Passed in 1966, amended in 1992 to include specific provisions for tribal consultation
• Requires federal agencies to consider effects of their actions on historic properties, including those of cultural significance to tribes
• Established Tribal Historic Preservation Officers (THPOs) to manage preservation programs on tribal lands
• Provides a framework for tribes to participate in the Section 106 review process for federal undertakings
• Has been used to protect sacred sites like Cave Rock in Nevada and Medicine Lake in California

Executive Order 13007

• Issued by President Clinton in 1996 to address Native American sacred site protection
• Directs federal agencies to accommodate access to and ceremonial use of sacred sites by Native Americans
• Requires agencies to avoid adversely affecting the physical integrity of sacred sites
• Emphasizes the importance of government-to-government consultation with tribes
• While significant, the order lacks the force of law and has been inconsistently implemented

Contemporary land issues

• Contemporary land issues facing Native American tribes are diverse and complex, reflecting ongoing struggles for sovereignty and cultural preservation
• These issues often intersect with broader societal concerns such as economic development, environmental protection, and social justice
• Understanding contemporary land issues is crucial for developing effective policies and solutions that respect tribal rights and promote equity

Land into trust process

• Allows tribes to petition the Department of Interior to take land into trust status
• Trust lands are held by the federal government for the benefit of tribes or individual Native Americans
• Provides increased tribal jurisdiction and protections against alienation of the land
• Process can be lengthy and faces opposition from state and local governments
• Recent Supreme Court decisions (Carcieri v. Salazar) have complicated the process for some tribes

Gaming and economic development

• Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 allowed tribes to operate casinos on trust lands
• Gaming has provided significant economic benefits for some tribes, funding social programs and infrastructure
• Has led to increased land acquisition efforts by tribes seeking to establish casinos
• Controversial due to concerns about social impacts and competition with non-Native businesses
• Some tribes have diversified beyond gaming into other economic development projects on tribal lands

Environmental concerns

• Many reservations face environmental challenges due to historical exploitation and neglect
• Issues include contamination from uranium mining, oil and gas extraction, and toxic waste dumping
• Climate change disproportionately affects tribal lands, threatening traditional resources and practices
• Tribes are increasingly asserting their sovereignty to implement environmental protections
• Collaborations between tribes and environmental groups have led to successful conservation efforts (Bears Ears National Monument)

Legal battles and precedents

• Legal battles over Native American land rights have shaped federal Indian law and policy for centuries
• These cases often set important precedents that influence future disputes and negotiations
• Understanding key legal battles provides insight into the evolving nature of tribal sovereignty and land rights in the United States

Tribal sovereignty cases

• Worcester v. Georgia (1832) established the principle of tribal sovereignty within U.S. law
• Williams v. Lee (1959) reaffirmed tribal court jurisdiction over reservation-based disputes
• Montana v. United States (1981) limited tribal jurisdiction over non-members on fee lands within reservations
• McGirt v. Oklahoma (2020) upheld Creek Nation reservation boundaries, impacting criminal jurisdiction
• These cases demonstrate the ongoing tension between tribal sovereignty and state/federal authority

Land claim settlements

• Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (1971) resolved Native land claims in Alaska through corporate structure
• Maine Indian Claims Settlement Act (1980) resolved land claims of Passamaquoddy and Penobscot tribes
• Cobell v. Salazar (2009) settled a class-action lawsuit over mismanagement of Indian trust assets
• Settlements often involve monetary compensation, land returns, and agreements on future governance
• Critics argue that settlements often fail to fully address historical injustices or restore adequate land bases

Sacred site litigation

• Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association (1988) allowed logging road construction through sacred sites
• Bear Lodge Multiple Use Association v. Babbitt (1999) upheld voluntary climbing closure at Devils Tower
• Navajo Nation v. U.S. Forest Service (2008) allowed use of treated wastewater for snowmaking on sacred San Francisco Peaks
• These cases highlight the challenges of protecting sacred sites under existing legal frameworks
• Outcomes have been mixed, with some victories for tribes but many sacred sites remaining vulnerable

International perspectives

• International perspectives on Indigenous land rights provide valuable context for understanding and addressing Native American issues
• Global frameworks and comparative studies offer alternative approaches and potential solutions to long-standing conflicts
• Examining international perspectives highlights the universal nature of Indigenous struggles for land rights and self-determination

UN Declaration on Indigenous Rights

• Adopted by the UN General Assembly in 2007, initially opposed by the U.S. but later endorsed in 2010
• Affirms Indigenous peoples' right to self-determination and control over traditional lands and resources
• Calls for free, prior, and informed consent before actions affecting Indigenous lands
• Emphasizes the importance of protecting Indigenous cultural and spiritual connections to land
• While not legally binding, provides a moral framework for Indigenous rights advocacy globally

Comparative indigenous land rights

• Australian Native Title system recognizes Indigenous land rights based on traditional laws and customs
• New Zealand's Treaty of Waitangi establishes a partnership between Māori and the Crown
• Canada's modern treaty process addresses unresolved land claims through negotiated agreements
• Latin American countries (Bolivia, Ecuador) have incorporated concepts of Indigenous rights into constitutions
• Comparing these systems reveals diverse approaches to reconciling Indigenous rights with state sovereignty

Global sacred site protection

• Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage protects sites of "outstanding universal value"
• Some countries (New Zealand, India) have granted legal personhood to natural features sacred to Indigenous peoples
• Australia's Aboriginal Land Rights Act provides strong protections for sacred sites in the Northern Territory
• International Labour Organization Convention 169 requires consultation with Indigenous peoples on land use decisions
• Global efforts highlight the universal importance of sacred sites to Indigenous cultural and spiritual practices

Cultural significance

• Understanding the cultural significance of land to Native American communities is crucial for developing respectful and effective land rights policies
• The deep connection between Indigenous peoples and their traditional territories goes beyond Western concepts of property ownership
• Recognizing the cultural significance of land helps bridge the gap between legal frameworks and Indigenous worldviews

Land in Native spirituality

• Many tribes view land as a living entity with its own spirit, not just a resource to be exploited
• Sacred sites often serve as places of prayer, ceremony, and connection with ancestors
• Creation stories and oral traditions are often tied to specific landscapes and natural features
• The concept of reciprocity with the land is central to many Native American spiritual practices
• Loss of access to sacred lands can have profound impacts on cultural and spiritual well-being

Traditional ecological knowledge

• Encompasses generations of observations, practices, and beliefs about local ecosystems
• Includes sustainable harvesting techniques, plant medicine knowledge, and wildlife management
• Often intertwined with spiritual beliefs and cultural practices tied to specific landscapes
• Increasingly recognized by scientists and policymakers as valuable for conservation efforts
• Preservation of traditional lands is crucial for maintaining and transmitting this knowledge

Intergenerational land stewardship

• Emphasizes the responsibility to care for the land for future generations
• Involves passing down traditional knowledge and practices through oral traditions and hands-on learning
• Conflicts with Western concepts of individual property rights and short-term economic gain
• Informs tribal land management decisions and conservation efforts
• Challenges posed by forced relocation and loss of access to traditional territories

Modern advocacy efforts

• Modern advocacy efforts for Native American land rights build on centuries of resistance and adaptation
• These movements often combine traditional Indigenous values with contemporary legal and political strategies
• Understanding current advocacy efforts is essential for supporting Indigenous rights and shaping future policy

Indigenous-led movements

• Standing Rock protests against Dakota Access Pipeline galvanized national attention on tribal land and water rights
• Land Back movement calls for the return of public lands to Indigenous stewardship
• Idle No More movement in Canada addresses Indigenous sovereignty and environmental protection
• These movements often utilize social media and digital organizing to build support and awareness
• Emphasize the connection between land rights, cultural preservation, and environmental justice

Non-Native allies and support

• Increased collaboration between Indigenous activists and environmental organizations
• Academic institutions developing Indigenous studies programs and supporting land rights research
• Legal advocacy groups (Native American Rights Fund) providing pro bono representation in land rights cases
• Faith-based organizations working to repudiate the Doctrine of Discovery and support land return
• Growing public awareness and support for Indigenous land rights issues among non-Native populations

Policy reform initiatives

• Efforts to strengthen the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) to better protect sacred sites
• Proposals to reform the land into trust process to address challenges posed by the Carcieri decision
• Initiatives to increase tribal co-management of public lands and national monuments
• Advocacy for stronger implementation of free, prior, and informed consent principles in federal decision-making
• Calls for comprehensive federal legislation to address sacred site protection across agencies