5.4 Allotment system

The allotment system was a pivotal policy in late 19th-century Native American history. It aimed to break up tribal lands into individual parcels, fundamentally altering Native Americans' relationship with land and traditional communal practices.

Implemented through the Dawes Act of 1887, allotment sought to promote assimilation and individualism among Native Americans. The policy led to massive land loss, cultural disruption, and lasting consequences that continue to shape Native American communities today.

Origins of allotment

• Allotment system emerged as a pivotal policy in Native American history during the late 19th century
• Represented a significant shift in federal approach to Native American land management and assimilation
• Aimed to fundamentally alter Native American relationship with land and traditional communal practices

Pre-allotment land policies

Top images from around the web for Pre-allotment land policies

• 

  Treaty of Fort Laramie (1851) - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Indigenous Tribes of the United States • FamilySearch View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Treaty of Fort Wayne (1809) - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Treaty of Fort Laramie (1851) - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Indigenous Tribes of the United States • FamilySearch View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Pre-allotment land policies

• 

  Treaty of Fort Laramie (1851) - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Indigenous Tribes of the United States • FamilySearch View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Treaty of Fort Wayne (1809) - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Treaty of Fort Laramie (1851) - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Indigenous Tribes of the United States • FamilySearch View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Reservation system established Native American tribes on designated territories
• Treaty-making process defined boundaries and rights of tribal lands
• Communal land ownership prevailed among most Native American tribes
• Government viewed tribal land practices as obstacle to westward expansion and "civilization"

Dawes Act of 1887

• Formally known as the General Allotment Act, introduced by Senator Henry Dawes
• Authorized the President to survey and divide tribal lands into individual allotments
• Allocated 160 acres to each family head, 80 acres to single adults over 18
• Imposed 25-year trust period on allotted lands to prevent immediate sale
• Declared "surplus" lands available for non-Native settlement

Goals of allotment system

• Promote assimilation of Native Americans into mainstream American society
• Break up tribal structures and communal land ownership
• Encourage individualism and private property ownership among Native Americans
• Create opportunities for non-Native settlement on "surplus" reservation lands
• Reduce federal expenses related to treaty obligations and reservation management

Implementation of allotment

• Allotment implementation profoundly altered Native American land tenure and social structures
• Process involved complex negotiations, surveys, and administrative procedures
• Varied significantly across different tribes and regions of the United States

Surveying and division process

• Government surveyors mapped and divided reservation lands into individual parcels
• Used grid system to create uniform allotments, often disregarding natural features or tribal land use patterns
• Implemented cadastral surveys to establish legal boundaries and ownership records
• Created detailed maps and plats to document the division of tribal lands

Tribal negotiations

• Government agents engaged in discussions with tribal leaders about allotment implementation
• Some tribes actively resisted allotment, while others negotiated for more favorable terms
• Negotiations often involved pressure tactics and misrepresentation of allotment benefits
• Resulted in varying agreements across tribes, influencing the pace and extent of allotment

Individual land assignments

• Tribal members required to select or were assigned specific parcels of land
• Process often favored those who quickly adapted to new system or had political connections
• Many Native Americans unfamiliar with concept of individual land ownership faced challenges
• Allotments often insufficient for sustainable agriculture in arid or less fertile regions
• Resulted in uneven distribution of resources and quality of land among tribal members

Impact on Native communities

• Allotment system caused profound and lasting changes to Native American societies
• Disrupted traditional social structures, economic systems, and cultural practices
• Led to significant loss of Native American land base and tribal sovereignty

Loss of tribal lands

• Tribes lost millions of acres classified as "surplus" after allotment process
• Between 1887 and 1934, Native American land holdings decreased from 138 million to 48 million acres
• Many individual allotments sold or leased to non-Natives due to economic pressures or fraud
• Resulted in checkerboard pattern of ownership on many reservations

Fragmentation of reservations

• Allotment divided previously contiguous tribal lands into scattered individual parcels
• Created jurisdictional issues and complicated tribal governance
• Impeded traditional land use practices (hunting, gathering, communal agriculture)
• Led to increased non-Native presence within reservation boundaries

Cultural and social disruption

• Undermined traditional tribal leadership structures and decision-making processes
• Forced shift from communal to individual land ownership conflicted with many tribal values
• Disrupted extended family living arrangements and clan-based social systems
• Accelerated loss of traditional knowledge related to land stewardship and resource management

Resistance and adaptation

• Native American communities employed various strategies to resist and adapt to allotment
• Efforts focused on preserving cultural identity and protecting remaining tribal lands
• Resistance took forms ranging from legal challenges to cultural revitalization movements

Native opposition strategies

• Some tribes initially refused to participate in allotment process
• Leaders like Sitting Bull and Chief Joseph vocally opposed allotment policies
• Ghost Dance movement emerged partly as spiritual resistance to allotment and assimilation
• Some communities maintained traditional practices on allotted lands despite restrictions

Legal challenges

• Tribes pursued legal action to contest implementation of Dawes Act
• Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock (1903) challenged constitutionality of allotment without tribal consent
• Supreme Court decisions often upheld federal power over tribal lands, limiting legal recourse
• Some tribes successfully negotiated modifications to allotment plans through legal means

Cultural preservation efforts

• Communities established cultural education programs to maintain traditional knowledge
• Native languages preserved through oral traditions and early written documentation efforts
• Traditional ceremonies continued in secret or adapted to avoid government suppression
• Native artists incorporated traditional motifs into new art forms to preserve cultural identity

Consequences of allotment

• Allotment system produced far-reaching and often unintended consequences for Native communities
• Effects extended beyond land ownership to economic, social, and environmental spheres
• Many consequences continue to impact Native American communities in the present day

Fractionation of land ownership

• Inheritance laws led to increasingly divided ownership of allotted parcels over generations
• Single allotment often came to be owned by hundreds or thousands of individuals
• Created complex legal and administrative challenges for land use and management
• Resulted in many parcels becoming economically unviable due to fractional interests

Economic effects on tribes

• Loss of land base severely limited tribal economic opportunities
• Many allottees forced to sell or lease lands due to inability to pay taxes or lack of resources
• Increased poverty and dependence on federal assistance among Native communities
• Disrupted traditional subsistence practices and sustainable resource management

Environmental impacts

• Allotment often led to overgrazing and soil erosion on small, individually-owned parcels
• Traditional ecological knowledge and sustainable land management practices disrupted
• Introduction of non-Native farming techniques often ill-suited to local environments
• Fragmentation of landscapes impacted wildlife habitats and migration patterns

End of allotment era

• Allotment policy officially ended with the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934
• Marked a significant shift in federal Indian policy towards greater tribal self-governance
• Effects of allotment continued to influence Native American communities long after its end

Indian Reorganization Act 1934

• Also known as the Wheeler-Howard Act or "Indian New Deal"
• Prohibited further allotment of tribal lands
• Authorized the return of surplus lands to tribal ownership
• Encouraged tribes to adopt constitutions and establish formal tribal governments
• Provided funds for land acquisition and economic development projects

Shift in federal policy

• Marked transition from assimilation to preservation of tribal cultures and sovereignty
• Influenced by changing public opinion and advocacy of reformers like John Collier
• Recognized failures of allotment in achieving its stated goals of assimilation and progress
• Emphasized importance of tribal self-determination and cultural preservation

Legacy of allotment system

• Lasting impact on land ownership patterns and tribal economic development
• Continued challenges with fractionated land ownership and checkerboard reservations
• Influenced subsequent federal policies and Native American activism
• Contributed to ongoing issues of tribal sovereignty and land rights

Modern implications

• Allotment era continues to shape contemporary Native American issues and policies
• Efforts to address allotment's legacy focus on land restoration and sovereignty enhancement
• Modern tribal governments navigate complex jurisdictional and land management challenges

Land restoration efforts

• Land Buy-Back Program for Tribal Nations established under Cobell Settlement
• Aims to consolidate fractional land interests and return them to tribal ownership
• Some tribes pursue land purchases to reacquire historically allotted lands
• Federal programs support acquisition of off-reservation lands for tribal use

Tribal sovereignty issues

• Checkerboard land ownership patterns complicate exercise of tribal jurisdiction
• Supreme Court decisions (McGirt v. Oklahoma) reaffirm reservation boundaries despite allotment
• Tribes develop innovative governance strategies to assert authority over fragmented lands
• Ongoing negotiations with federal and state governments over jurisdictional matters

Contemporary land management

• Tribes implement integrated resource management plans on reconsolidated lands
• Traditional ecological knowledge increasingly incorporated into land use decisions
• Development of tribal land codes to address complex ownership and use issues
• Collaborative management agreements with federal agencies on co-managed lands

Allotment vs reservation system

• Comparison highlights fundamental differences in approaches to Native American land policy
• Illustrates shift from recognition of tribal sovereignty to forced assimilation attempts
• Demonstrates long-term consequences of different land tenure systems on Native communities

Differences in land ownership

• Reservation system maintained communal tribal ownership of lands
• Allotment system imposed individual ownership and privatization of tribal lands
• Reservations preserved larger contiguous land bases for tribal use
• Allotment created fragmented, checkerboard patterns of land ownership

Impact on tribal governance

• Reservation system generally recognized tribal authority over designated territories
• Allotment undermined tribal governance by fragmenting land base and introducing non-Native residents
• Reservations allowed for maintenance of traditional leadership structures
• Allotment forced adoption of new governance models aligned with individual property ownership

Long-term consequences comparison

• Reservation system better preserved tribal land bases and cultural continuity
• Allotment resulted in massive land loss and cultural disruption for many tribes
• Reservations faced challenges of limited economic opportunities and federal control
• Allotment created ongoing issues of fractionated ownership and jurisdictional complexities