11.1 Ethical Frameworks in Negotiation

Ethical principles in negotiation guide decision-making and behavior. Utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics, social contract theory, and care ethics offer diverse approaches to navigating complex moral landscapes in negotiations.

Applying these frameworks helps negotiators balance competing interests, adhere to moral standards, and foster trust. Each approach has strengths and limitations, influencing strategy, real-time choices, and long-term outcomes in negotiations.

Ethical Principles and Theories in Negotiation

Key ethical principles in negotiations

Top images from around the web for Key ethical principles in negotiations

• 

  The three moral codes of behaviour | Clamor World View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Glossary of ethical principles, terms and values (L. Hammo… | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Comparing the Virtue Ethics of East and West – Business Ethics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The three moral codes of behaviour | Clamor World View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Glossary of ethical principles, terms and values (L. Hammo… | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Key ethical principles in negotiations

• 

  The three moral codes of behaviour | Clamor World View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Glossary of ethical principles, terms and values (L. Hammo… | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Comparing the Virtue Ethics of East and West – Business Ethics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The three moral codes of behaviour | Clamor World View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Glossary of ethical principles, terms and values (L. Hammo… | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Utilitarianism promotes greatest good for the greatest number focuses on consequences-based approach (cost-benefit analysis)
• Deontology emphasizes duty-based ethics stresses moral rules and obligations (Kant's Categorical Imperative)
• Virtue Ethics cultivates character and moral excellence fosters honesty and fairness (Aristotelian ethics)
• Social Contract Theory establishes agreement among rational individuals for mutual benefit forms basis for fair negotiations (Rousseau's social contract)
• Care Ethics considers relationships and contextual decision-making emphasizes emotional factors in negotiations (Gilligan's ethics of care)

Application of ethical frameworks

• Utilitarianism evaluates outcomes based on overall benefit balances interests of all stakeholders (corporate mergers)
• Deontological approach adheres to moral principles regardless of consequences respects rights and autonomy of all parties (labor negotiations)
• Virtue ethics cultivates negotiator integrity and trustworthiness fosters long-term relationships (business partnerships)
• Social contract theory establishes fair ground rules ensures mutual consent and reciprocity (international treaties)
• Care ethics considers impact of decisions on relationships emphasizes empathy in negotiation process (family mediation)

Strengths vs limitations of ethical approaches

• Utilitarianism promotes consideration of wide-ranging impacts struggles with quantifying diverse outcomes (public policy decisions)
• Deontology provides clear moral guidelines may lead to inflexibility in complex situations (whistleblowing dilemmas)
• Virtue Ethics encourages personal growth and integrity lacks specific action guidance in dilemmas (professional ethics)
• Social Contract Theory promotes fairness and mutual agreement faces challenges in achieving consensus among diverse parties (constitutional conventions)
• Care Ethics emphasizes human relationships and context risks bias in favor of close relationships (healthcare decision-making)

Ethics in negotiation planning

• Pre-negotiation phase identifies potential ethical issues establishes guidelines for negotiation team (corporate code of conduct)
• Negotiation strategy aligns tactics with ethical principles anticipates ethical challenges (diplomatic negotiations)
• Real-time decision-making applies ethical frameworks to dilemmas balances competing considerations (crisis management)
• Long-term implications impact reputation and future negotiations build trust and sustainable relationships (brand management)
• Post-negotiation reflection assesses ethical performance learns from successes and failures (organizational learning)