3.2 Behavioral Decision Theory

Behavioral decision theory challenges the idea of perfect rationality in negotiations. It explores how our brains use shortcuts and biases when making choices. Understanding these mental processes can help negotiators make better decisions and avoid common pitfalls.

Negotiators can use framing and anchoring to influence perceptions and outcomes. However, they must also be aware of their own biases. Strategies like perspective-taking, using objective criteria, and collaborative problem-solving can help mitigate these cognitive influences and lead to more effective negotiations.

Foundations of Behavioral Decision Theory

Concepts of behavioral decision theory

Top images from around the web for Concepts of behavioral decision theory

• 

  Rational Decision Making vs. Other Types of Decision Making | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Decision Making Process | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Stages of Negotiation | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Rational Decision Making vs. Other Types of Decision Making | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Decision Making Process | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Concepts of behavioral decision theory

• 

  Rational Decision Making vs. Other Types of Decision Making | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Decision Making Process | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Stages of Negotiation | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Rational Decision Making vs. Other Types of Decision Making | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Decision Making Process | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Behavioral decision theory examines real-world decision-making processes challenging classical economic assumptions of perfect rationality
• Bounded rationality acknowledges cognitive limitations and constraints (time, information, processing power) introduced by Herbert Simon
• Heuristics serve as mental shortcuts simplifying complex decisions (availability, representativeness, anchoring and adjustment)

Cognitive biases in negotiations

• Confirmation bias leads negotiators to seek information supporting existing beliefs
• Overconfidence bias causes overestimation of abilities or judgments potentially leading to unrealistic expectations
• Loss aversion creates stronger preference for avoiding losses than acquiring equivalent gains influencing risk-taking behavior
• Sunk cost fallacy drives continued investment based on past expenditures rather than future prospects
• Fundamental attribution error attributes others' behavior to personality ignoring situational factors (cultural differences, time constraints)
• Hindsight bias creates illusion of predictability for past events affecting future decision-making
• Status quo bias preference for maintaining current state can hinder creative solutions

Negotiation Strategies and Cognitive Influences

Framing and anchoring techniques

• Framing presents information shaping perception and decision-making (gain frame, loss frame, competitive frame, collaborative frame)
• Anchoring uses initial information to influence subsequent judgments first offer often serves as reference point
• Framing affects risk perception and decision preferences while anchoring impacts counteroffers and final settlements

Strategies for mitigating biases

• Awareness and education recognize common biases and their effects on decision-making
• Perspective-taking consider other party's viewpoint to reduce attribution errors
• Objective criteria rely on external standards or benchmarks (market prices, industry norms)
• Comprehensive preparation gather information to counter availability bias
• Decision-making frameworks employ structured approaches (decision trees, SWOT analysis)
• Collaborative problem-solving focus on mutual interests to overcome competitive framing
• Time management allow for reflection avoiding rushed decisions prone to heuristics
• Diverse opinions consult others to challenge assumptions and reduce confirmation bias
• Scenario planning consider multiple potential outcomes to mitigate overconfidence