8.3 Influence Tactics and Resistance

Influence tactics play a crucial role in negotiations. From reciprocity to scarcity, these strategies shape how we interact and make decisions. Understanding these tactics helps us navigate complex social situations and achieve our goals more effectively.

Resisting influence requires awareness and critical thinking. By recognizing persuasion attempts and questioning motives, we can make more informed choices. Strategies like delaying decisions and seeking alternative perspectives empower us to maintain control in negotiations.

Understanding Influence Tactics

Common influence tactics in negotiation

Top images from around the web for Common influence tactics in negotiation

• 

  Modern IT Management: How to negotiate better (Lecture 6) · Langerman Panta Rhei View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Modern IT Management: How to negotiate better (Lecture 6) · Langerman Panta Rhei View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 1

Top images from around the web for Common influence tactics in negotiation

• 

  Modern IT Management: How to negotiate better (Lecture 6) · Langerman Panta Rhei View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Modern IT Management: How to negotiate better (Lecture 6) · Langerman Panta Rhei View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 1

• Reciprocity creates sense of obligation by returning favors (buying lunch)
• Commitment and consistency escalates small actions into larger commitments over time (free trial)
• Social proof leverages others' actions to influence behavior through testimonials (customer reviews)
• Liking builds rapport and finds common ground with other party (shared interests)
• Authority demonstrates expertise using credentials or symbols (titles, uniforms)
• Scarcity emphasizes limited availability and unique opportunities (limited time offer)
• Framing presents information in specific context highlighting certain aspects (positive vs negative framing)

Strategies for resisting influence

• Awareness recognizes influence attempts and underlying psychology (sales tactics)
• Critical thinking questions motives and evaluates validity of claims (fact-checking)
• Delay tactics avoid immediate commitments and allow time for consideration (sleep on it)
• Setting clear boundaries communicates personal limits and declines unwanted requests assertively (saying no)
• Seeking alternative perspectives consults trusted sources and researches counterarguments (getting second opinion)
• Preparation gathers relevant information and understands one's own position before negotiations (market research)
• Emotional regulation manages responses and maintains composure under pressure (deep breathing)

Analyzing and Evaluating Influence

Role of social proof and authority

• Social proof mechanisms drive conformity to group norms and bandwagon effect (fashion trends)
• Cultural factors affect social proof differently in collectivist vs individualist societies (group decisions)
• Authority influence channels operate through formal hierarchies and informal leadership (CEO directives)
• Psychological basis of authority influence demonstrated in Milgram's obedience experiments (following orders)
• Intersection of social proof and authority seen in how influencers leverage their status in modern media (celebrity endorsements)

Effectiveness of influence tactics

• Context-dependent effectiveness matches tactics to specific scenarios and cultural norms (negotiation styles)
• Ethical considerations balance persuasion with manipulation and long-term consequences (transparency)
• Resistance factors include target's awareness level and strength of existing beliefs (skepticism)
• Combining multiple tactics can have synergistic effects or potential conflicts (multi-channel marketing)
• Measurable outcomes define success criteria and track behavioral changes (conversion rates)
• Adaptability in approach recognizes when to switch tactics and responds to changing circumstances (pivot strategies)