6.3 Somatosensory feedback in prosthetic limbs

Somatosensory feedback in prosthetic limbs is crucial for natural control and user acceptance. It provides sensory information about touch, pressure, and limb position, enhancing the user's sense of ownership and improving motor control. This feedback bridges the gap between artificial limbs and natural sensations.

Various techniques, like vibrotactile feedback and direct nerve stimulation, are used to provide sensory information. While challenges exist in signal processing and sensory mapping, the benefits of improved control, enhanced embodiment, and increased acceptance make somatosensory feedback a vital aspect of modern prosthetics.

Somatosensory Feedback in Prosthetic Limbs

Importance of somatosensory feedback

Top images from around the web for Importance of somatosensory feedback

• 

  Frontiers | A Review of Sensory Feedback in Upper-Limb Prostheses From the Perspective of Human ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Somatosensory Pathways – KINES 200: Introductory Neuroscience View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Motor Control and Sensory Feedback Enhance Prosthesis Embodiment and Reduce Phantom ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | A Review of Sensory Feedback in Upper-Limb Prostheses From the Perspective of Human ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Somatosensory Pathways – KINES 200: Introductory Neuroscience View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Importance of somatosensory feedback

• 

  Frontiers | A Review of Sensory Feedback in Upper-Limb Prostheses From the Perspective of Human ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Somatosensory Pathways – KINES 200: Introductory Neuroscience View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Motor Control and Sensory Feedback Enhance Prosthesis Embodiment and Reduce Phantom ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | A Review of Sensory Feedback in Upper-Limb Prostheses From the Perspective of Human ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Somatosensory Pathways – KINES 200: Introductory Neuroscience View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Provides sensory information to the user about the prosthetic limb's interaction with the environment
  • Allows users to perceive touch, pressure, temperature, and proprioception (body position and movement)
  • Enables more natural and intuitive control of the prosthetic limb (grasping objects, adjusting grip strength)
• Enhances the user's sense of embodiment and ownership over the prosthetic limb
  • Reduces the feeling of the prosthesis being a foreign object attached to the body
  • Improves the psychological acceptance of the prosthetic limb as an integral part of the user's body
• Facilitates better motor control and coordination of the prosthetic limb
  • Provides real-time feedback for fine-tuning movements and making precise adjustments
  • Enables users to adjust grip force and prevent object slippage (holding a fragile egg, gripping a slippery bottle)

Techniques for prosthetic sensory feedback

• Vibrotactile feedback uses vibrating motors or actuators placed on the residual limb or other parts of the body
  • Conveys information about touch, pressure, or texture through varying vibration patterns and intensities (short pulses for light touch, continuous vibration for sustained pressure)
  • Can be non-invasive and easily implemented using commercially available vibration motors
• Electrotactile feedback delivers electrical stimulation to the skin surface of the residual limb
  • Activates cutaneous sensory receptors to elicit sensations of touch, pressure, or tingling
  • Can provide more localized and graded feedback compared to vibrotactile stimulation (stimulating specific areas of the skin to indicate contact location)
  • Requires careful calibration of stimulation parameters to avoid discomfort or pain
• Direct nerve stimulation involves implanting electrodes directly into the peripheral nerves of the residual limb
  • Provides more natural and specific sensory feedback by stimulating the appropriate nerve fibers (stimulating touch-sensitive fibers for tactile feedback)
  • Allows for a wider range of sensations and higher resolution compared to surface stimulation techniques
  • Requires surgical intervention and carries risks associated with implantable devices (infection, electrode migration)

Challenges in feedback integration

• Signal processing requires robust and reliable sensing technologies to detect and quantify environmental stimuli
  • Involves filtering, amplification, and conversion of sensor data into meaningful feedback signals
  • Needs to account for noise, artifacts, and variations in sensor performance (compensating for temperature changes, managing cross-talk between sensors)
• Sensory mapping presents challenges in accurately mapping the sensory feedback to the corresponding areas of the residual limb or phantom limb
  • Requires individualized calibration and adaptation to match the user's sensory perceptions (mapping pressure sensors to specific areas of the phantom hand)
  • May involve complex algorithms for spatial and temporal mapping of sensory information (translating sensor data into naturalistic sensations)
• User training necessitates extensive training and adaptation periods for users to effectively interpret and utilize the sensory feedback
  • Involves learning to associate the artificial sensations with the corresponding environmental stimuli (recognizing different vibration patterns as distinct textures)
  • Requires ongoing practice and reinforcement to develop intuitive and automatic responses to the feedback (adjusting grip force based on perceived pressure)

Benefits of somatosensory feedback

• Improved control enables more precise and dexterous manipulation of objects
  • Allows for better modulation of grip force and reduced reliance on visual feedback (picking up a delicate object without crushing it)
  • Facilitates faster and more accurate completion of daily tasks (tying shoelaces, buttoning a shirt)
• Enhanced embodiment promotes a greater sense of ownership and integration of the prosthetic limb into the user's body schema
  • Reduces the perceived mismatch between the prosthesis and the user's sensory expectations (feeling the sensation of touching a surface rather than relying solely on vision)
  • Contributes to a more natural and intuitive experience of using the prosthetic limb (subconsciously adjusting hand position based on perceived limb location)
• Increased acceptance improves user satisfaction and quality of life by providing a more complete sensory experience
  • Reduces the likelihood of prosthesis abandonment due to lack of sensory feedback and limited functionality
  • Enhances the psychological well-being and social integration of amputees by enabling more natural interactions with their environment (shaking hands, holding a loved one's hand)