9.1 Principles of feedback control in neuroprosthetics

Feedback control in neuroprosthetics ensures stable and effective device operation. By continuously monitoring output and adjusting input, it compensates for disturbances, adapts to changes, ensures safety, and optimizes performance. This crucial principle enhances the functionality of neuroprosthetic devices.

The control loop consists of sensors, controllers, and actuators working together. Sensors measure system output, controllers process data and generate signals, and actuators produce the desired action. This setup allows for precise control and adaptation in neuroprosthetic applications.

Feedback Control in Neuroprosthetics

Feedback control in neuroprosthetics

Top images from around the web for Feedback control in neuroprosthetics

• 

  Frontiers | A Control Scheme That Uses Dynamic Postural Synergies to Coordinate a Hybrid Walking ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Control of Prosthetic Hands via the Peripheral Nervous System | Neuroscience View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Neurohybrid Memristive CMOS-Integrated Systems for Biosensors and Neuroprosthetics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | A Control Scheme That Uses Dynamic Postural Synergies to Coordinate a Hybrid Walking ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Control of Prosthetic Hands via the Peripheral Nervous System | Neuroscience View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Feedback control in neuroprosthetics

• 

  Frontiers | A Control Scheme That Uses Dynamic Postural Synergies to Coordinate a Hybrid Walking ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Control of Prosthetic Hands via the Peripheral Nervous System | Neuroscience View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Neurohybrid Memristive CMOS-Integrated Systems for Biosensors and Neuroprosthetics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | A Control Scheme That Uses Dynamic Postural Synergies to Coordinate a Hybrid Walking ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Control of Prosthetic Hands via the Peripheral Nervous System | Neuroscience View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Fundamental principle ensures stable and effective device operation by continuously monitoring system's output and adjusting input to maintain desired performance
• Compensates for external disturbances and uncertainties in the system (noise, environmental changes)
• Adapts to changes in user's needs or environment (varying terrain, fatigue)
• Ensures safety by preventing undesired or unstable behavior (excessive force, uncontrolled motion)
• Optimizes device performance by minimizing errors and maximizing efficiency (energy consumption, response time)

Components of neuroprosthetic control loops

• Sensors measure output or state of neuroprosthetic system
  • Electromyographic (EMG) sensors detect muscle activity
  • Force sensors measure interaction forces between device and environment
  • Position sensors track joint angles or end-effector location
  • Convert physical quantities into electrical signals for processing
• Controllers process sensor data and generate control signals based on desired set point or reference
  • Implement control algorithms (proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control, adaptive control)
  • Adjust control signals to minimize error between desired and actual output
• Actuators receive control signals from controller and generate desired output or action
  • Electric motors provide rotary or linear motion
  • Hydraulic or pneumatic systems generate high forces
  • Functional electrical stimulation (FES) activates paralyzed muscles
  • Convert electrical signals into physical motion or force to control neuroprosthetic device

Open-loop vs closed-loop control strategies

• Open-loop control does not use feedback from system's output to adjust input
  • Relies on predetermined set of commands or stimuli
  • Suitable for simple or predictable tasks (grasping objects, walking on flat ground)
  • Less adaptable to changes in system or environment
• Closed-loop control uses feedback from system's output to continuously adjust input
  • Compares actual output with desired output and minimizes error
  • Provides better stability, accuracy, and adaptability
  • Suitable for complex or dynamic tasks (manipulating delicate objects, navigating uneven terrain)
  • Requires more computational resources and may introduce delays in system

Challenges of biological feedback control

• Signal noise contaminates biological signals (EMG, neural recordings) from various sources
  • Affects accuracy and reliability of feedback control system
  • Filtering techniques and advanced signal processing algorithms mitigate effects of noise
• Delays inherent in biological systems due to signal propagation, processing, and actuation
  • Cause instability or oscillations in feedback control loop
  • Predictive or anticipatory control strategies compensate for delays
• Non-linearities in biological systems complicate design and implementation of feedback control algorithms
  • Muscle activation dynamics and neural adaptation exhibit non-linear behavior
  • Advanced control techniques (adaptive control, robust control) handle non-linearities in system