6.3 Noise mapping and prediction methods

Noise mapping and prediction methods are essential tools for understanding and managing outdoor sound propagation. These techniques use software and mathematical models to visualize sound levels across large areas, helping identify noise hotspots and assess mitigation strategies.

From empirical formulas to complex numerical simulations, various methods can predict noise levels in different environments. By combining these approaches with field measurements and statistical analysis, engineers can create accurate noise maps to inform urban planning, environmental impact assessments, and noise control efforts.

Noise mapping with software

Generating noise maps

Top images from around the web for Generating noise maps

• 

  SE - Introducing noisi: a Python tool for ambient noise cross-correlation modeling and noise ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Ocean Sound Analysis Software for Making Ambient Noise Trends Accessible (MANTA) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Assessment of Indoor and Outdoor Noise Pollution at a University Hospital Based on Acoustic ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  SE - Introducing noisi: a Python tool for ambient noise cross-correlation modeling and noise ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Ocean Sound Analysis Software for Making Ambient Noise Trends Accessible (MANTA) View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Generating noise maps

• 

  SE - Introducing noisi: a Python tool for ambient noise cross-correlation modeling and noise ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Ocean Sound Analysis Software for Making Ambient Noise Trends Accessible (MANTA) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Assessment of Indoor and Outdoor Noise Pollution at a University Hospital Based on Acoustic ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  SE - Introducing noisi: a Python tool for ambient noise cross-correlation modeling and noise ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Ocean Sound Analysis Software for Making Ambient Noise Trends Accessible (MANTA) View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Noise mapping software uses prediction methods and geospatial data to generate visual representations of sound levels over a defined area
  • Key inputs for noise mapping include:
    • Source characteristics (sound power level, directivity)
    • Propagation factors (distance, barriers, ground effects)
    • Receiver locations
• Noise maps typically use a color scale to represent sound levels in decibels (dB) at different positions
  • Higher levels are indicated by warmer colors (red, orange)
  • Lower levels are indicated by cooler colors (green, blue)
• Common noise metrics for mapping include:
  • Equivalent continuous sound level (Leq)
  • Day-night average sound level (Ldn)
  • Maximum sound level (Lmax) over a specified time period

Modeling complex environments

• Noise mapping software can model complex environments with multiple sources, buildings, and terrain features to provide a comprehensive assessment of outdoor noise exposure
  • Can handle urban areas with many buildings, roads, and industrial sources
  • Can account for effects of terrain like hills, valleys, and ground cover (vegetation, pavement) on sound propagation
  • Can incorporate meteorological conditions (wind speed/direction, temperature gradients) that influence sound refraction and attenuation
  • Can simulate noise barriers, building facades, and other mitigation measures to assess their effectiveness in reducing sound levels

Noise level prediction methods

Empirical methods

• Empirical methods use simplified formulas or look-up tables based on measured data to estimate noise levels at a receiver location
  • Examples include:
    • ISO 9613-2 (general method)
    • CNOSSOS-EU (road traffic noise)
  • Consider key parameters like:
    • Source sound power
    • Distance
    • Ground type
    • Meteorological conditions
• Empirical methods are computationally efficient but may have limitations in accuracy and ability to model complex environments
  • Suitable for simple geometries and homogeneous atmospheres
  • May not capture effects of terrain, obstacles, or meteorological variations
  • Useful for screening-level assessments or comparative analyses

Numerical methods

• Numerical methods solve fundamental physics equations to simulate sound propagation from source to receiver, providing more detailed and accurate predictions
  • Examples include:
    • Parabolic equation (PE)
    • Boundary element method (BEM)
    • Finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) models
• Can handle complex geometries, inhomogeneous atmospheres, and non-linear effects
  • PE method models refraction and diffraction over large distances (kilometers)
  • BEM method models scattering from arbitrary shapes and impedance boundaries
  • FDTD method models time-domain propagation and transient effects
• Numerical methods are more computationally intensive than empirical methods
  • Require discretization of the domain into small elements or grid points
  • May need high resolution to capture fine details or high frequencies
  • Parallelization and GPU acceleration can speed up calculations

Hybrid and selection of methods

• Hybrid methods combine empirical and numerical approaches to balance efficiency and accuracy
  • Use PE for long-range propagation and BEM for near-source effects
  • Couple ray tracing with FDTD to model high frequencies and time-domain effects
  • Embed source models (directivity, spectrum) into propagation calculations
• The choice of prediction method depends on factors like:
  • Frequency range of interest (low, mid, high)
  • Scale of the problem (near-field, far-field)
  • Environmental complexity (terrain, meteorology, urban/rural)
  • Computational resources available (CPU, memory, runtime)

Interpreting noise maps

Exposure analysis

• Noise maps provide a spatial overview of sound levels that can be used to locate hot spots or areas exceeding regulatory limits or guidelines
  • Identify areas with high noise levels (industrial zones, transportation corridors)
  • Compare levels to criteria based on land-use, time of day, or receiver type (residential, school, hospital)
• Exposure analysis involves overlaying noise maps with population data to estimate the number of people affected by different sound levels and prioritize areas for mitigation
  • Calculate population exposure statistics (% above threshold, noise-induced annoyance)
  • Rank areas by exposure level and population density to target mitigation efforts
  • Assess environmental justice by comparing exposure across demographic groups

Planning and mitigation

• Noise contour maps show lines of equal sound level (isopleths) that can help define zones for land-use planning
  • Locate sensitive receivers (homes, schools) away from high-noise areas
  • Establish buffer zones or compatible land-uses (commercial, industrial) near sources
  • Optimize site layout and building orientation to minimize noise exposure
• Comparing noise maps for different scenarios can demonstrate the effectiveness of mitigation measures and inform cost-benefit analysis
  • Evaluate noise reduction from barriers, building insulation, traffic management
  • Quantify the number of people benefiting from different mitigation options
  • Estimate the costs and annualized benefits (health, property value) of mitigation

Temporal variation

• Animated noise maps can show how sound levels vary over time, which is useful for assessing intermittent or time-varying sources
  • Visualize diurnal patterns of road traffic or airport operations
  • Identify peak hours or days with highest noise levels
  • Assess the impact of temporary sources (construction, events) on long-term averages
• Noise mapping at different times can inform operational changes to reduce exposure
  • Modify flight paths or runway usage to avoid sensitive areas at night
  • Reschedule noisy activities (deliveries, maintenance) to less sensitive hours
  • Coordinate timing of multiple sources to avoid cumulative peaks

Validating noise models

Comparison with measurements

• Field measurements provide real-world data to assess the accuracy and uncertainty of noise prediction models
  • Capture actual sound levels under specific conditions (source, environment, meteorology)
  • Provide reference values to calibrate or validate model predictions
• Validation involves comparing predicted and measured sound levels at multiple positions under representative conditions
  • Source operation (power setting, directivity, spectrum)
  • Meteorology (wind speed/direction, temperature, humidity)
  • Ground cover (impedance, roughness, topography)
• Key considerations for validation measurements include:
  • Microphone type (free-field, pressure) and placement (height, orientation)
  • Sampling duration (minutes, hours) and frequency (broadband, octave/third-octave bands)
  • Documentation of source and environmental parameters (log sheets, photos)

Statistical evaluation

• Statistical measures can quantify agreement between predictions and measurements
  • Bias (mean difference) indicates systematic over/under-prediction
  • Root-mean-square error (RMSE) measures the average magnitude of differences
  • Correlation coefficient (R) assesses the linear relationship between variables
• Scatter plots of predicted vs. measured levels can visualize the degree of agreement
  • Points falling along the 1:1 line indicate perfect agreement
  • Points above/below the line indicate over/under-prediction
  • Spread of points indicates the variability or uncertainty of predictions
• Bland-Altman plots can assess bias and limits of agreement across the range of levels
  • Plot the difference (prediction - measurement) vs. the mean of the two values
  • Horizontal lines show the mean difference and 95% limits of agreement
  • Trends or outliers can indicate level-dependent bias or anomalies

Model refinement

• Discrepancies between predicted and measured levels can help identify limitations or errors in the model inputs, calculation methods, or assumptions
  • Inaccurate source characterization (sound power, directivity, spectrum)
  • Inappropriate ground impedance or meteorological conditions
  • Errors in terrain or building geometry and material properties
• Model refinement involves adjusting parameters or calculation settings to improve agreement with measurements
  • Estimate ground impedance from measured level differences at multiple heights
  • Optimize source directivity or spectrum to match measured values
  • Increase terrain resolution or update building database to reflect actual conditions
• Sensitivity analysis can determine which model inputs have the greatest influence on the predictions and guide data collection efforts to reduce uncertainty
  • Vary input parameters (source height, ground type) over plausible ranges
  • Calculate sensitivity coefficients (partial derivatives) or correlation indices
  • Prioritize parameters with high sensitivity and uncertainty for further refinement