5.1 Formulation of integer and mixed-integer problems
3 min read•july 24, 2024
Integer and tackle discrete decision-making scenarios, logical constraints, and combinatorial optimization problems. These methods are crucial for solving real-world issues like , facility location, and , which require integer solutions.
Formulating integer models involves using binary, general integer, and continuous variables. The and constraints incorporate integer decision impacts, logical conditions, and special ordered sets. This approach offers greater modeling flexibility compared to , but faces computational challenges.
Understanding Integer and Mixed-Integer Programming
Problems for integer programming
Top images from around the web for Problems for integer programming
Black-box combinatorial optimization using models with integer-valued minima | Annals of ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Integer programming models and branch-and-cut approaches to generalized {0,1,2}-survivable ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | A Mixed-Integer Linear Programming Formulation for Optimizing Multi-Scale Material ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Black-box combinatorial optimization using models with integer-valued minima | Annals of ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Integer programming models and branch-and-cut approaches to generalized {0,1,2}-survivable ... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Problems for integer programming
Black-box combinatorial optimization using models with integer-valued minima | Annals of ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Integer programming models and branch-and-cut approaches to generalized {0,1,2}-survivable ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | A Mixed-Integer Linear Programming Formulation for Optimizing Multi-Scale Material ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Black-box combinatorial optimization using models with integer-valued minima | Annals of ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Integer programming models and branch-and-cut approaches to generalized {0,1,2}-survivable ... View original
Logical constraints encompass yes/no decisions (product launch) and if-then conditions (production line setup)
Combinatorial optimization problems include traveling salesman (optimal route planning) and knapsack (item selection within weight limit)
Scheduling problems address job shop scheduling (task sequencing on machines) and airline crew scheduling (assigning crews to flights)
Network design problems optimize supply chain networks (distribution center locations) and telecommunications planning (cell tower placement)
Formulation of integer models
Decision variables use binary (product selection), general integer (number of units), and continuous variables (production quantities)
Objective function maximizes profit or minimizes cost incorporating integer decision impacts (fixed costs, economies of scale)
Constraints include logical constraints using binary variables (mutually exclusive choices), capacity constraints with integer variables (machine utilization), and budget constraints (investment limits)
Special ordered sets Type 1 allow at most one non-zero variable (selecting one supplier) while Type 2 permit two adjacent non-zero variables (piecewise linear approximations)
Indicator constraints link binary variables to other constraints (activating production lines)
Big M method uses large constants to enforce logical conditions (facility opening triggers fixed costs)
Linear vs integer programming
Continuous vs discrete solution space differentiates LP (real-valued variables) from IP (integer-restricted variables)
properties contrast LP's convex with IP's non-convex region due to integer restrictions
Solution methods differ with LP using simplex and interior point methods while IP employs and cutting plane algorithms
Optimality guarantees vary as LP finds global optima efficiently while IP struggles with global optimality assurance
Modeling flexibility allows IP to capture complex logical relationships beyond LP's linear constraints
Computational complexity classifies LP as polynomial-time solvable while IP is generally NP-hard
Limitations of integer programming
Computational complexity results in exponential worst-case time complexity hindering large-scale problem solving
between IP and LP relaxation solutions impacts solution quality and algorithm performance
Branching strategies in branch and bound require effective variable selection balancing tree depth and width