6.5 Improving the Quality of Decision-Making

Decisions shape our lives and organizations. From quick mental shortcuts to structured processes, various techniques can enhance our choices. This section explores heuristics, satisficing, and systematic approaches that help us navigate complex decision-making landscapes.

Generating alternatives is crucial for effective decision-making. We'll look at creative methods like brainstorming and lateral thinking, as well as analytical tools for evaluating options. Understanding cognitive biases and implementation strategies rounds out our toolkit for making better choices.

Techniques for improved decision-making

Techniques for improved decision-making

Top images from around the web for Techniques for improved decision-making

• 

  The Decision Making Process | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Decision Making Process | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Rational Decision Making vs. Other Types of Decision Making | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Decision Making Process | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Decision Making Process | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Techniques for improved decision-making

• 

  The Decision Making Process | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Decision Making Process | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Rational Decision Making vs. Other Types of Decision Making | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Decision Making Process | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Decision Making Process | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Heuristics serve as mental shortcuts or rules of thumb to simplify decision-making processes
  • Availability heuristic judges likelihood based on the ease of recalling similar instances (recent events, vivid memories)
  • Representativeness heuristic makes judgments based on perceived similarity to stereotypes or prototypes (assuming an individual possesses certain traits based on group membership)
  • Anchoring and adjustment relies heavily on initial information as a starting point, then insufficiently adjusts estimates (estimating project costs based on past projects without fully considering unique factors)
  • While heuristics can be efficient, they may lead to cognitive biases and suboptimal decisions by oversimplifying complex situations
• Satisficing involves choosing the first acceptable option that meets a minimum threshold rather than searching for the optimal solution
  • Useful when time is limited, information is scarce, or the cost of searching for the best alternative outweighs the potential benefits (choosing a vendor that meets basic criteria rather than exhaustively evaluating all options)
  • Satisficing can be an effective strategy when "good enough" solutions are sufficient and perfect decisions are not required
  • This concept is closely related to bounded rationality (Herbert A. Simon), which recognizes that decision-makers have limited cognitive resources and often make decisions under constraints
• Systematic decision-making processes, such as the rational decision-making model, provide a structured approach to ensure thorough analysis and consideration of relevant factors
  1. Define the problem or opportunity at hand
  2. Identify the decision criteria or objectives to be met
  3. Weight the relative importance of each criterion
  4. Generate a range of potential alternatives or solutions
  5. Rate each alternative on its ability to satisfy each criterion
  6. Compute the optimal decision based on the highest weighted score
  • Systematic processes help decision-makers avoid common pitfalls, such as overlooking key factors or rushing to judgment, by enforcing a logical sequence of steps (NASA's decision-making process for space missions)

Generation of decision alternatives

• Brainstorming encourages creative thinking and generates a wide range of potential solutions without initial judgment
  • Participants freely share ideas, build upon others' suggestions, and defer criticism to foster divergent thinking (Google's "10x thinking" brainstorming sessions)
• Lateral thinking approaches problems indirectly, challenging assumptions and exploring novel perspectives
  • Techniques include provocation (intentionally making outrageous statements to stimulate new ideas), random entry (selecting a random word or image to generate associations), and reversal (considering the opposite of the current approach)
• Dialectical inquiry generates alternatives by exploring opposing viewpoints and synthesizing them into new solutions
  • Decision-makers deliberately consider conflicting opinions, critique each position, and seek to reconcile the differences (using "red teams" to challenge proposed strategies)
• Synectics uses analogies and metaphors to generate novel ideas and connections
  • Participants draw comparisons to seemingly unrelated domains, such as nature or art, to spark creative insights (biomimicry in product design, like Velcro inspired by burrs)
• Analyzing alternatives involves assessing the feasibility, costs, benefits, and potential outcomes of each option
  • Feasibility analysis evaluates the practicality and viability of alternatives based on available resources, constraints, and organizational capabilities
  • Cost-benefit analysis weighs the expected costs against the anticipated benefits, both tangible and intangible, to determine the net value of each alternative
  • Scenario planning considers how each alternative might play out under different future conditions, helping decision-makers prepare for various contingencies (Shell's scenario planning for energy futures)
  • Decision trees visually map out the possible outcomes and probabilities associated with each alternative, facilitating risk assessment and expected value calculations

Cognitive biases and decision traps

• Confirmation bias leads decision-makers to seek out information that supports their existing beliefs while ignoring contradictory evidence
• The framing effect influences decisions based on how information is presented, emphasizing the importance of considering multiple perspectives
• Groupthink can occur in cohesive groups, leading to poor decisions due to pressure for conformity and suppression of dissenting views
• Decision fatigue can impair judgment as individuals make multiple decisions over time, highlighting the importance of prioritizing and scheduling important decisions

Strategies for decision implementation

• Action planning develops a detailed roadmap for executing the chosen alternative
  • Identifies specific tasks, timelines, responsibilities, and milestones to guide implementation efforts (Gantt charts, PERT diagrams)
  • Helps ensure coordination, accountability, and progress tracking
• Resource allocation involves securing and deploying the necessary resources to support the decision
  • Includes budgeting for financial resources, assigning personnel, and procuring materials or technology
  • Effective resource allocation aligns with strategic priorities and optimizes utilization
• Stakeholder management engages affected parties to build support, address concerns, and minimize resistance
  • Involves identifying key stakeholders, assessing their interests and influence, and tailoring communication strategies (power-interest grid)
  • Proactive stakeholder engagement can help build buy-in, gather valuable input, and mitigate potential obstacles
• Change management addresses the human side of implementing decisions, particularly those involving significant organizational or behavioral changes
  • Employs strategies such as communication, training, and incentives to help individuals adapt to and adopt new ways of working (Kotter's 8-step change model)
  • Effective change management can reduce resistance, maintain morale, and accelerate the realization of desired outcomes
• Evaluating decision effectiveness is crucial for learning, accountability, and continuous improvement
  • Establishing clear metrics and key performance indicators $KPIs$ aligned with decision objectives
  • Collecting relevant data through methods such as surveys, interviews, or system analytics
  • Comparing actual results against expected outcomes to assess the degree of success
  • Conducting post-implementation reviews to gather lessons learned and identify improvement opportunities
  • Making data-driven adjustments to optimize performance and respond to changing circumstances (A/B testing, agile methodologies)