9.2 Work Group Structure

Work groups are the backbone of organizational structure, shaping how employees interact and perform. From roles and norms to status systems and cohesiveness, these elements define group dynamics. Understanding these factors is crucial for managers to build effective teams and foster a productive work environment.

Group size, communication patterns, and leadership styles all play a role in work group effectiveness. By recognizing the impact of these elements, organizations can optimize team structures, improve collaboration, and ultimately enhance overall performance. Balancing individual needs with group goals is key to creating high-functioning work groups.

Work Group Structure

Work roles and group dynamics

Top images from around the web for Work roles and group dynamics

• 

  Conflict Management Styles | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Creating Effective Teams | Organizational Behavior / Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Group Development | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Conflict Management Styles | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Creating Effective Teams | Organizational Behavior / Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Work roles and group dynamics

• 

  Conflict Management Styles | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Creating Effective Teams | Organizational Behavior / Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Group Development | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Conflict Management Styles | Organizational Behavior and Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Creating Effective Teams | Organizational Behavior / Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Roles are shared expectations about how individuals should behave in a group shape behavior by defining responsibilities and boundaries
• Role ambiguity can lead to stress, dissatisfaction, and lower performance when individuals are uncertain about their duties and expectations
• Role conflict occurs when incompatible demands are placed on an individual resulting in tension and reduced effectiveness (conflicting instructions from different managers)
• As group size increases, individual effort and performance tend to decrease due to social loafing where individuals exert less effort when working collectively
• Larger groups have more difficulty coordinating tasks and reaching consensus due to increased complexity and diversity of opinions (decision-making in a 20-person committee)
• Smaller groups allow for more individual participation and accountability as each member's contributions are more visible and impactful
• Optimal group size depends on the task complexity and required skills with simpler tasks benefiting from larger groups and complex tasks requiring smaller, more specialized teams
• Norms are informal, unwritten rules that govern group behavior establishing standards for appropriate conduct and performance (dress codes, meeting etiquette)
• Conformity to norms helps maintain group cohesion and stability by creating a shared sense of identity and purpose
• Deviating from norms can lead to social sanctions or exclusion as the group pressures members to adhere to established expectations (ostracizing a consistently late team member)
• Norms can be functional by promoting group goals and efficiency or dysfunctional by hindering creativity and adaptability (discouraging dissenting opinions)
• Group dynamics influence how members interact, communicate, and work together to achieve common goals

Status systems in organizations

• Status refers to an individual's relative position or rank within a group hierarchy influencing their level of respect, influence, and privileges
• Status can be based on formal characteristics such as job title, seniority, or education level (manager vs. entry-level employee)
• Status can also be based on informal characteristics such as expertise, charisma, or social connections (highly skilled programmer in an IT department)
• Higher status individuals tend to have more influence and decision-making power as their opinions and preferences carry greater weight
• Status differences can create communication barriers and power imbalances hindering open dialogue and collaboration across hierarchical levels
• Status systems shape social interactions, resource allocation, and career advancement opportunities by defining implicit rules and expectations (executive dining rooms, preferential treatment in promotions)
• Status incongruence occurs when an individual's perceived status does not match their formal position creating dissonance and tension (highly experienced subordinate and inexperienced manager)
• Incongruence can arise from demographic differences such as age, gender, or ethnicity challenging traditional status hierarchies (young female CEO in a male-dominated industry)
• Status incongruence can lead to interpersonal conflicts, resentment, and reduced cooperation as individuals struggle to reconcile conflicting status cues
• Individuals may engage in status-seeking behaviors to resolve incongruence and assert their desired status (emphasizing credentials, forming strategic alliances)
• Organizations with high status incongruence may experience higher turnover and lower morale as employees feel undervalued or unfairly treated
• The organizational hierarchy influences the distribution of power and authority within the work group structure

Factors of group cohesiveness

• Similarity among group members in terms of values, backgrounds, and goals fosters a sense of unity and belonging (shared educational background, common hobbies)
• Frequency and quality of interactions and communication build stronger interpersonal bonds and trust among group members
• Shared experiences and challenges that foster a sense of unity such as overcoming obstacles or celebrating successes together (successfully completing a high-stakes project)
• External threats or competition that create an "us vs. them" mentality rallying the group around a common adversary or goal (rivalry with another department)
• Supportive leadership that promotes collaboration, trust, and open communication among group members (regularly recognizing team achievements, encouraging input from all members)
• Highly cohesive groups tend to have higher member satisfaction and commitment as individuals feel valued, supported, and emotionally invested in the group's success
• Cohesiveness can enhance motivation as individuals are driven to contribute to the group's goals and maintain positive relationships with their peers
• Members of cohesive groups are more likely to engage in cooperative behaviors such as information sharing, mutual assistance, and constructive feedback
• Cohesiveness can improve communication, decision-making, and problem-solving processes by fostering open dialogue, trust, and collective intelligence
• However, excessive cohesiveness may lead to groupthink where the desire for harmony overrides critical thinking and dissent (failing to consider alternative solutions)
• Excessive cohesiveness can also lead to resistance to change as the group becomes overly attached to its current norms and practices (rejecting new technologies or processes)
• Optimal levels of cohesiveness balance individual autonomy with group integration allowing for both a strong sense of belonging and independent thought
• Team composition, including the mix of skills, personalities, and backgrounds, affects group cohesiveness and overall performance

Group Development and Interdependence

• Groups typically progress through stages of development, including forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning
• The level of interdependence among group members influences how they work together and share responsibilities
• Power dynamics within the group can affect decision-making processes and the distribution of influence among members