8.1 Amdahl's Law and Gustafson's Law

Amdahl's Law and Gustafson's Law are crucial concepts in understanding the limits and potential of parallel computing. They provide frameworks for analyzing how programs can benefit from additional processors, helping developers make informed decisions about scalability and optimization strategies.

These laws highlight the importance of balancing parallelizable and sequential code sections. While Amdahl's Law focuses on fixed-size problems, Gustafson's Law considers scenarios where problem size can grow with available resources, offering a more optimistic view of parallel scaling potential.

Amdahl's Law Implications

Quantifying Maximum Speedup

Top images from around the web for Quantifying Maximum Speedup

• 

  Amdahl's law - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Amdahl's Law | Introduction to High Performance and High Throughput Computing View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Amdahl's Law | Introduction to High Performance and High Throughput Computing View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Amdahl's law - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Amdahl's Law | Introduction to High Performance and High Throughput Computing View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Quantifying Maximum Speedup

• 

  Amdahl's law - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Amdahl's Law | Introduction to High Performance and High Throughput Computing View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Amdahl's Law | Introduction to High Performance and High Throughput Computing View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Amdahl's law - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Amdahl's Law | Introduction to High Performance and High Throughput Computing View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Amdahl's Law quantifies maximum speedup achievable through parallelization considering parallel and sequential components
• Formula expresses speedup as $S = \frac{1}{(1-p) + \frac{p}{n}}$ where p represents parallelizable fraction and n represents number of processors
• Overall speedup limited by fraction of program that cannot be parallelized (sequential portion)
• As number of processors increases, speedup asymptotically approaches limit determined by sequential fraction
• Even small sequential portions can severely limit potential speedup in highly parallel systems (1% sequential portion limits maximum speedup to 100x)

Optimization Strategies

• Emphasizes importance of optimizing sequential portion to achieve significant overall speedup
• Focusing efforts on parallelizable sections yields diminishing returns as sequential bottlenecks dominate
• Algorithmic improvements in sequential portion can have more significant impact than simply adding processors
• Identifies critical sections for optimization efforts (hotspots in profiling)
• Encourages developers to minimize synchronization and communication overhead in parallel sections

Limitations and Assumptions

• Assumes fixed problem size regardless of number of processors used
• Does not account for scenarios where problem size scales with number of processors (addressed by Gustafson's Law)
• Neglects real-world factors like communication overhead, load balancing, and memory constraints
• May not accurately predict performance for dynamic or irregular workloads
• Assumes perfect parallelization of parallel portion, which is often unrealistic in practice

Limitations of Parallel Speedup

Speedup Bounds

• Maximum achievable speedup inversely proportional to fraction of program executed sequentially
• As number of processors approaches infinity, speedup bounded by $\frac{1}{1-p}$ where p represents parallelizable fraction
• For programs with 90% parallelizable code, maximum theoretical speedup limited to 10x regardless of processors added
• Adding more processors yields diminishing returns, especially when sequential portion significant
• Real-world speedups often fall short of theoretical limits due to various overheads and inefficiencies

Diminishing Returns

• Law demonstrates adding more processors provides negligible improvements beyond certain point
• Illustrates concept of "knee of the curve" where additional processors offer minimal benefit (typically occurs when number of processors approaches $\frac{1}{1-p}$)
• Emphasizes importance of cost-benefit analysis when scaling parallel systems
• Encourages focus on algorithmic improvements rather than hardware scaling alone
• Highlights need for balanced approach to parallel system design considering both hardware and software optimizations

Practical Considerations

• Does not consider communication overhead between processors (can become significant bottleneck)
• Ignores load balancing issues that may arise in real-world parallel systems
• Fails to account for memory constraints that may limit scalability (cache coherence, memory bandwidth)
• Assumes perfect parallelization which is often unrealistic due to synchronization and data dependencies
• May not accurately represent performance of dynamic or irregular workloads common in many applications

Gustafson's Law Extension

Scaled Speedup Concept

• Addresses limitations of Amdahl's Law by considering scenarios where problem size scales with number of processors
• Assumes as more processors become available, problem size increases proportionally, maintaining constant execution time
• Introduces concept of "scaled speedup" measuring how much larger problem can be solved in same time with more processors
• Formula expressed as $S(P) = P - \alpha(P - 1)$ where S represents speedup, P represents number of processors, and α represents non-parallelizable fraction
• Demonstrates more optimistic potential speedup for problems that can scale with available resources

Comparison with Amdahl's Law

• Gustafson's Law assumes problem size grows with number of processors while Amdahl's Law assumes fixed problem size
• Provides more optimistic outlook for parallel scaling especially for large-scale scientific and engineering problems
• Addresses limitation of Amdahl's Law in scenarios where increased computational power allows for more detailed or larger-scale problems
• Shifts focus from speeding up fixed-size problems to solving larger problems in same time
• Highlights importance of considering both laws when analyzing parallel performance potential

Applications and Implications

• Particularly relevant in scenarios such as scientific simulations, data analytics, and machine learning
• Encourages development of scalable algorithms that can utilize additional resources effectively
• Supports justification for large-scale parallel systems in fields where problem sizes can grow with available computing power
• Influences design decisions in high-performance computing architectures (supercomputers, cloud computing platforms)
• Emphasizes importance of developing parallel algorithms that can efficiently handle increasing problem sizes

Analyzing Parallel Performance

Applying Amdahl's Law

• Calculate theoretical maximum speedup for given program with known parallel fraction and number of processors
• Use formula $S = \frac{1}{(1-p) + \frac{p}{n}}$ to predict speedup for various scenarios
• Analyze impact of varying parallel fraction on potential speedup (create graphs showing speedup vs. number of processors for different p values)
• Identify theoretical limits of parallelization for specific applications
• Use results to determine cost-effectiveness of adding more processors for fixed-size problems

Utilizing Gustafson's Law

• Estimate scaled speedup when problem size can increase with number of processors
• Apply formula $S(P) = P - \alpha(P - 1)$ to predict performance for scalable problems
• Analyze how problem size can grow while maintaining constant execution time as processors increase
• Compare scaled speedup predictions with fixed-size speedup from Amdahl's Law
• Use results to justify investment in larger parallel systems for scalable problems

Real-world Considerations

• Recognize limitations of both laws in real-world scenarios (communication overhead, load balancing, memory constraints)
• Incorporate additional factors into performance models (network topology, data locality, synchronization costs)
• Use profiling tools to identify actual parallel and sequential portions in real applications
• Compare theoretical predictions with measured performance to refine models and identify optimization opportunities
• Apply insights from both laws to optimize parallel algorithms by identifying and minimizing sequential bottlenecks in code