You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides
You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides

Measuring attitudes is crucial for understanding . This section dives into various methods, from self-report scales to implicit tests and physiological measures. Each technique offers unique insights, with multi-method approaches providing the most comprehensive picture of attitudes.

Attitude change is influenced by many factors. , , audience characteristics, and cognitive processes all play roles. Understanding these elements helps predict and enhance persuasive effectiveness while considering ethical implications of attitude manipulation.

Attitudes and Persuasion

Components and Functions of Attitudes

Top images from around the web for Components and Functions of Attitudes
Top images from around the web for Components and Functions of Attitudes
  • Attitudes comprise evaluative judgments about objects, people, or ideas with cognitive, affective, and behavioral components
  • Tripartite model explains interaction of cognitive, affective, and behavioral components in forming overall attitudes
  • Attitudes serve various functions
    • Value-expressive function allows individuals to express core and
    • Knowledge function helps organize and simplify complex information
    • Utilitarian function guides approach or avoidance behaviors
    • Ego-defensive function protects self-esteem and manages anxiety
  • Strength and accessibility of attitudes influence their impact on behavior and resistance to change
    • Strong attitudes more likely to guide behavior and resist persuasion attempts
    • Highly accessible attitudes quickly retrieved from memory and influence snap judgments
  • Implicit and explicit attitudes can coexist and sometimes conflict
    • Implicit attitudes operate unconsciously and may contradict explicitly stated beliefs
    • Discrepancies between implicit and explicit attitudes can lead to complex persuasion outcomes

Role of Attitudes in Persuasion

  • Attitudes act as mediators between persuasive messages and behavioral outcomes
  • Influence information processing by guiding attention and interpretation of new information
  • Shape decision-making processes by providing evaluative frameworks for choices
  • Moderate the effectiveness of persuasive appeals based on their alignment with existing attitudes
  • Determine resistance or susceptibility to counter-attitudinal messages
  • Affect the likelihood of attitude-behavior consistency in response to persuasive attempts

Measuring Attitudes

Self-Report and Behavioral Measures

  • Self-report measures assess explicit attitudes
    • Likert scales use agreement ratings with attitudinal statements (strongly disagree to strongly agree)
    • scales employ bipolar adjective pairs to rate attitude objects (good-bad, pleasant-unpleasant)
  • Behavioral observation techniques provide insights through non-verbal cues and actions
    • Facial expressions and body language analyzed for emotional responses
    • Approach-avoidance behaviors measured in controlled settings
  • technique reduces social desirability bias
    • Participants believe they are connected to a lie detector, encouraging more honest responses
    • Effective for sensitive topics (racial attitudes, sexual behaviors)

Physiological and Implicit Measures

  • Physiological measures offer objective data on attitudinal responses
    • detects subtle muscle movements associated with emotional reactions
    • reveals brain activation patterns during attitude-related tasks
  • (IAT) measure unconscious attitudes
    • Assess reaction times to stimuli pairings (e.g., Black/White faces with positive/negative words)
    • Reveal automatic associations that may differ from explicitly stated attitudes
  • Content analysis of written or spoken communication reveals attitudes in naturalistic settings
    • Frequency of positive or negative language use
    • Thematic analysis of attitude-relevant topics

Multi-Method Approaches

  • Combining various techniques provides comprehensive assessment of attitudes
  • Triangulation of methods increases validity and reliability of attitude measurements
  • Examples of multi-method approaches
    • Pairing self-report scales with behavioral observations
    • Combining IAT results with physiological measures
    • Integrating content analysis of social media posts with traditional survey methods

Factors Influencing Attitude Change

Source and Message Characteristics

  • Source credibility significantly impacts persuasiveness
    • Expertise enhances message acceptance (medical advice from a doctor)
    • Trustworthiness increases believability (endorsements from respected public figures)
  • Message characteristics affect attitude change
    • Framing influences perception (emphasizing gains vs. losses in health campaigns)
    • Emotional appeal evokes attitudinal responses (fear appeals in anti-smoking ads)
    • Use of evidence strengthens arguments (statistical data in climate change discussions)

Audience and Social Factors

  • Audience factors influence receptivity to persuasive attempts
    • Prior knowledge moderates message processing (experts vs. novices in a field)
    • Motivation affects depth of information processing (personal relevance of the topic)
    • Cognitive capacity impacts ability to process complex arguments (distraction, time pressure)
  • Social influence processes lead to attitude shifts
    • Conformity pressure in group settings (changing opinions to match peers)
    • Social proof in ambiguous situations (following others' behaviors in emergencies)

Cognitive Processes in Attitude Change

  • theory explains attitude shifts due to inconsistencies
    • Smokers changing attitudes about smoking risks to reduce discomfort of conflicting beliefs and behaviors
  • (ELM) describes routes to persuasion
    • Central route involves careful consideration of message arguments
    • Peripheral route relies on superficial cues (attractiveness of source, number of arguments)
  • Inoculation theory suggests strengthening attitudes against future attacks
    • Exposing individuals to weakened counterarguments builds resistance
    • Used in health campaigns to prevent attitude change towards risky behaviors (drug use prevention programs)

Effectiveness of Persuasive Messages

Factors Moderating Persuasion Effectiveness

  • Attitude accessibility and strength moderate relationship between messages and change
    • Highly accessible attitudes more resistant to persuasion attempts
    • Strong attitudes require more compelling evidence to shift
  • Sleeper effect explains delayed impact of persuasive messages
    • Message impact increases over time as source is forgotten
    • Initially discounted information becomes more persuasive later (low-credibility source forgotten)
  • Resistance to persuasion influenced by various factors
    • Reactance occurs when freedom feels threatened (heavy-handed anti-drug campaigns)
    • Forewarning of persuasive intent can increase message scrutiny
    • Selective exposure to information reinforces existing attitudes (echo chambers in social media)

Measuring and Predicting Attitude Change

  • Attitude change measurement requires consideration of immediate and long-term effects
    • Immediate post-message assessments may not capture delayed attitude shifts
    • Longitudinal studies track attitude stability or change over time
  • links attitudes to behavioral intentions and actions
    • Provides framework for assessing persuasive effectiveness beyond attitudinal measures
    • Considers subjective norms and perceived behavioral control alongside attitudes
  • Meta-analyses of persuasion research offer insights into strategy effectiveness
    • Comparative effectiveness of different appeal types (fear vs. humor)
    • Moderating factors across contexts (individual differences, cultural variations)

Ethical Considerations in Persuasion Research

  • Informed consent crucial in studies involving attitude manipulation
    • Participants must understand potential risks of exposure to persuasive messages
    • Debriefing essential to explain true nature of study and address any concerns
  • Deception in persuasion studies raises ethical questions
    • Balancing research validity with participant well-being
    • Careful consideration of potential harm from temporary deception
  • Long-term effects on participants' attitudes and behaviors must be considered
    • Follow-up assessments to ensure no lasting negative impacts
    • Provision of resources for participants affected by attitude change experiments (counseling services)
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Glossary