2.2 Deductive and inductive reasoning in science

Scientists use two key reasoning methods: deductive and inductive. Deductive reasoning starts with general principles to draw specific conclusions, while inductive reasoning uses specific observations to make broader generalizations. Both are crucial for scientific progress.

In practice, these methods work together in a cycle. Inductive reasoning helps generate hypotheses from observations, while deductive reasoning tests those hypotheses by making predictions. This interplay drives scientific discovery and refines our understanding of the natural world.

Deductive vs Inductive Reasoning

Contrasting Deductive and Inductive Approaches

Top images from around the web for Contrasting Deductive and Inductive Approaches

• 

  Inductive and Deductive Reasoning | English Composition 1 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Inductive and Deductive Reasoning | English Composition I View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Science of Biology · Biology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Inductive and Deductive Reasoning | English Composition 1 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Inductive and Deductive Reasoning | English Composition I View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Contrasting Deductive and Inductive Approaches

• 

  Inductive and Deductive Reasoning | English Composition 1 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Inductive and Deductive Reasoning | English Composition I View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Science of Biology · Biology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Inductive and Deductive Reasoning | English Composition 1 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Inductive and Deductive Reasoning | English Composition I View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Deductive reasoning is a top-down approach that starts with general principles or theories and uses them to draw specific conclusions
  • Moves from the general to the specific (universal gravitation to predicting the orbit of a specific planet)
• Inductive reasoning is a bottom-up approach that starts with specific observations or data points and uses them to infer broader generalizations or theories
  • Moves from the specific to the general (observing many black crows and concluding that all crows are black)

Certainty and Validity of Conclusions

• In deductive reasoning, if the premises are true and the logic is valid, then the conclusion must necessarily be true
  • Deductive arguments are truth-preserving (the truth of the premises guarantees the truth of the conclusion)
• In inductive reasoning, even if the premises are true, the conclusion is not guaranteed to be true, only probable to some degree
  • Inductive arguments are ampliative - they add information not contained in the premises (inferring a general pattern from specific instances)
• Science utilizes both deductive and inductive reasoning in a continuous cycle
  • Inductive reasoning generates hypotheses based on observations (noticing that animals with similar features tend to be related)
  • Deductive reasoning makes predictions and tests those hypotheses (if evolution by common descent is true, then we should observe certain patterns of shared traits and DNA sequences)

Applying Deductive Reasoning

Valid Deductive Arguments

• In a valid deductive argument, the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises
  • If the premises are true, the conclusion must be true (modus ponens: if P then Q; P; therefore Q)
• Deductive reasoning in science often takes the form of if-then statements (conditionals)
  • If a scientific law states that X causes Y, and X is present, then we can deduce that Y will occur (if increasing greenhouse gas concentrations cause warming, and we increase greenhouse gases, then warming will occur)

Syllogisms and Logical Arguments

• Syllogisms are a common form of deductive argument consisting of a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion
  • All metals conduct electricity (major premise)
  • Copper is a metal (minor premise)
  • Therefore, copper conducts electricity (conclusion)
• Mathematical proofs and logical arguments are examples of deductive reasoning
  • The conclusions are certain, provided the axioms or premises are true and the reasoning is valid (proving a theorem in geometry based on axioms and definitions)
• Deductive reasoning is used in science to make specific predictions based on general theories or laws
  • These predictions can then be tested empirically (using the laws of physics to predict the trajectory of a projectile, then measuring it)

Generating Hypotheses with Induction

Enumerative Induction and Analogical Reasoning

• Inductive reasoning involves drawing generalized conclusions from specific instances or observations
  • It is the foundation of scientific hypothesis generation (observing many cases of finches with different beak shapes on different islands and hypothesizing that the differences are adaptations to different food sources)
• Inductive arguments in science typically take the form of enumerative induction - drawing a general conclusion from a number of specific instances
  • Observing many white swans and concluding that all swans are white (which was later falsified by the discovery of black swans in Australia)
• Analogical induction involves drawing conclusions about a phenomenon based on its similarities to another phenomenon that is better understood
  • Using our understanding of artificial selection to develop theories about natural selection (Darwin's analogy between selective breeding and evolution by natural selection)

Provisional Nature of Inductive Conclusions

• Hypotheses generated through inductive reasoning are provisional and subject to further testing and potential falsification
  • They are not conclusively proven by the observations that led to their formation (Newton's law of universal gravitation was very successful but was later superseded by Einstein's general relativity)
• The strength of an inductive argument depends on factors such as:
  • The number and diversity of instances observed (a conclusion based on a large and varied sample is more reliable than one based on a small or homogeneous sample)
  • The plausibility of alternative explanations (a hypothesis is stronger if it is the best available explanation for the observations)
  • The simplicity of the proposed generalization (Occam's razor: all else being equal, the simplest explanation is preferable)

Evaluating Reasoning in Science

Strengths and Limitations of Deductive Reasoning

• Deductive reasoning provides certainty in its conclusions, but only if the premises are true and the logic is valid
  • Its usefulness depends on the soundness of the theories and laws used as premises (deductions based on flawed theories will yield flawed conclusions)
• Deductive reasoning does not generate new empirical knowledge, but rather explores the implications of what is already known or assumed
  • It is useful for making testable predictions (using the laws of inheritance to predict the outcomes of genetic crosses)

Strengths and Limitations of Inductive Reasoning

• Inductive reasoning allows for the generation of new hypotheses and theories based on empirical observations
  • It is the source of scientific creativity and discovery (inducing the theory of plate tectonics from diverse geological evidence)
• However, inductive conclusions are always uncertain and provisional
  • No matter how many positive instances are observed, the next instance could potentially contradict the generalization (concluding that all swans are white based on European observations, then discovering black swans in Australia)
• There is an inherent risk of overgeneralization or hasty generalization in inductive reasoning, especially when the sample of instances is small or biased
  • Stereotyping and prejudice often result from faulty inductive reasoning (assuming that all members of a group share the characteristics of a few salient examples)

The Interplay of Deduction and Induction

• Both deductive and inductive reasoning are necessary in science, but neither is sufficient on its own
  • Science progresses through a cycle of inductive hypothesis generation and deductive hypothesis testing (inductively formulating a hypothesis based on observations, then deductively deriving predictions and testing them experimentally)
• Scientific conclusions are always tentative and subject to revision based on new evidence or better theories
  • Even well-established scientific laws are not absolutely certain in the way that deductive conclusions are (Newton's laws were highly successful but were revised by relativity and quantum mechanics in light of new evidence)
• The provisional nature of science does not undermine its reliability or usefulness
  • Scientific theories are the most reliable and powerful tools we have for understanding and predicting natural phenomena, even if they are not perfect or complete