Social cognition and motivation shape our interactions and drive our social behaviors. From forming impressions to making decisions, our minds use shortcuts and biases that influence how we perceive others and navigate social situations.
Our need for , status, and belonging motivates us to seek positive interactions and manage our reputations. We constantly compare ourselves to others, shaping our self-concept and driving us to improve or maintain our social standing.
Cognitive Processes in Social Interaction
Social Perception and Attribution
Top images from around the web for Social Perception and Attribution
The Social and Personality Psychology Domain | Introduction to Psychology View original
Is this image relevant?
Free Attribution Theory PowerPoint Template - Free PowerPoint Templates - SlideHunter.com View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Deriving meaning from others’ emotions: attribution, appraisal, and the use of ... View original
Is this image relevant?
The Social and Personality Psychology Domain | Introduction to Psychology View original
Is this image relevant?
Free Attribution Theory PowerPoint Template - Free PowerPoint Templates - SlideHunter.com View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Social Perception and Attribution
The Social and Personality Psychology Domain | Introduction to Psychology View original
Is this image relevant?
Free Attribution Theory PowerPoint Template - Free PowerPoint Templates - SlideHunter.com View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | Deriving meaning from others’ emotions: attribution, appraisal, and the use of ... View original
Is this image relevant?
The Social and Personality Psychology Domain | Introduction to Psychology View original
Is this image relevant?
Free Attribution Theory PowerPoint Template - Free PowerPoint Templates - SlideHunter.com View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
forms impressions, judgments, and inferences about others based on observable behaviors and characteristics
Involves interpreting facial expressions, body language, and verbal cues
Influenced by and personal experiences
overestimates internal factors and underestimates external factors when explaining others' behaviors
Example: Assuming a coworker's tardiness stems from laziness rather than considering potential traffic issues
explains how pre-existing mental frameworks influence interpretation and organization of social information
Schemas act as cognitive shortcuts for processing new information
Can lead to biased interpretations when encountering information that doesn't fit existing schemas
Cognitive Biases and Heuristics
serve as mental shortcuts in social decision-making processes
relies on immediate examples that come to mind (recent news stories shaping perceptions of crime rates)
judges probability based on how closely something matches a prototype ( based on appearance)
Cognitive biases affect social perception and decision-making
seeks information confirming pre-existing beliefs (selectively reading news articles that align with political views)
attributes positive outcomes to internal factors and negative outcomes to external factors (crediting personal skills for job promotion but blaming bad luck for failure)
of social cognition distinguishes between automatic and controlled processing
System 1: Intuitive, fast, and effortless processing (snap judgments about strangers)
System 2: Reflective, slow, and effortful processing (carefully considering multiple perspectives in a complex social situation)
Social Categorization and Stereotyping
simplifies complex social environments by grouping individuals based on shared characteristics
Helps manage large amounts of social information efficiently
Can lead to oversimplification and loss of individual nuances
Stereotyping applies generalized beliefs about a group to individual members
Can be both positive and negative (Asians are good at math, women are nurturing)
Often based on limited information or overgeneralization
and can result from rigid categorization and stereotyping
Prejudice involves negative attitudes or feelings towards a group
Discrimination translates prejudiced attitudes into actions or behaviors
Strategies to reduce stereotyping and prejudice
Increasing under positive conditions
Promoting individuating information to challenge group-based assumptions
Social Rewards and Motivation
Social Reinforcement and Learning
posits behaviors followed by positive social outcomes are more likely to be repeated
: Praise for helping a classmate increases likelihood of future helping behavior
: Avoiding social situations to escape anxiety reinforces social withdrawal
emphasizes importance of observing and modeling behaviors of others
Bandura's Bobo doll experiment demonstrated children imitating aggressive behaviors observed in adults
Role models significantly influence behavior acquisition (parents, peers, media figures)
Cultural differences influence interpretation and impact of social rewards
Individualistic cultures may emphasize personal achievement and recognition
Collectivistic cultures may prioritize group harmony and fulfilling social obligations
Social Approval and Rejection
Social approval activates brain's reward centers, influencing motivation and behavior
Neuroimaging studies show increased activity in the ventral striatum during social approval
Likes on social media posts trigger dopamine release, reinforcing posting behavior
and rejection trigger negative emotional responses
Activates similar brain regions as physical pain (anterior cingulate cortex)
Can lead to decreased self-esteem, increased aggression, or social withdrawal
motivates individuals to maintain or enhance social standing
Engaging in prosocial behaviors to improve social image
Avoiding actions that could damage reputation within valued social groups
Social Exchange and Status
explains how individuals weigh costs and benefits of social interactions
People tend to seek relationships and interactions with favorable cost-benefit ratios
influences expectations of give-and-take in social exchanges
Social status concerns drive behavior to maintain or improve position within groups
Pursuing education or career advancement to increase social standing
to signal wealth and status (luxury goods, expensive hobbies)
Power dynamics in social relationships influence motivation and behavior
Those with higher status may exert more influence on group decisions
Lower status individuals may engage in ingratiation or to gain acceptance
Social Comparison and Self-Evaluation
Types of Social Comparison
proposes individuals evaluate abilities and opinions by comparing to others
Festinger's original theory focused on comparison with similar others
Later research expanded to include upward and downward comparisons
Upward social comparisons involve comparing oneself to those perceived as better
Can motivate self-improvement (aspiring to emulate a successful mentor)
May lead to feelings of inadequacy or lower self-esteem if perceived gap is too large
Downward social comparisons involve comparing oneself to those perceived as worse off
Can enhance self-esteem (feeling grateful for one's circumstances compared to less fortunate)
May reduce motivation for improvement if used excessively
Self-Discrepancy and Relative Deprivation
describes how differences between actual, ideal, and ought selves influence motivation
Actual self: Current attributes and characteristics
Ideal self: Aspirational qualities one hopes to possess
Ought self: Qualities one believes they should possess based on obligations or responsibilities
Relative deprivation explains how perceived discrepancies motivate goal-directed behavior
Occurs when individuals feel they lack desired resources compared to a reference group
Can lead to feelings of resentment, anger, or increased motivation to change circumstances
balances desire for self-enhancement with maintaining relationships
Individuals may downplay their own abilities in domains important to close others
Seeking to excel in different domains than close others to avoid competition
Cultural Influences on Social Comparison
Individualistic cultures may emphasize personal achievement in social comparisons
Focus on standing out and surpassing others in valued domains
Greater emphasis on self-improvement motivated by upward comparisons
Collectivistic cultures may prioritize group harmony in social comparisons
Greater emphasis on fitting in and maintaining group cohesion
May engage in self-effacement to avoid appearing boastful or disrupting group dynamics
Cross-cultural differences in self-enhancement and self-criticism
Western cultures tend to exhibit self-enhancement bias in social comparisons
East Asian cultures may demonstrate self-criticism as a motivational strategy
Social Identity and Behavior
Group Membership and Self-Concept
theory explains how individuals categorize themselves and others into social groups
Ingroups: Groups to which an individual belongs and identifies with
Outgroups: Groups to which an individual does not belong or identify with
Individuals derive self-esteem and motivation from group membership
Positive distinctiveness: Seeking to view one's group as superior to outgroups
Group success and achievements contribute to individual self-worth
describes tendency to favor members of one's own group
Allocating more resources or opportunities to ingroup members
Judging ingroup members more positively than outgroup members
Group Dynamics and Behavior
occurs when discussions lead to more extreme attitudes or decisions
Can result in "groupthink" where dissenting opinions are suppressed
Example: Jury deliberations leading to harsher sentences than individual jurors would impose
Conformity and demonstrate how social pressure influences individual behavior
Asch conformity experiments showed individuals conforming to incorrect group judgments
Milgram obedience studies revealed high levels of compliance with authority figures
explains anonymity's impact in groups
Anonymity can increase adherence to group norms (online forums, social media)
Reduced individual accountability may lead to more extreme behavior (cyberbullying)
Intergroup Relations and Collective Behavior
and competition strengthen ingroup cohesion and motivation
Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated how competition creates hostility between groups
Common enemy or shared threat can unify diverse groups (national unity during wartime)
describes shared beliefs in a group's capabilities
Influences group motivation and goal-directed behavior
High collective efficacy associated with better team performance and resilience
Strategies for improving intergroup relations
Contact hypothesis: Positive intergroup contact reduces prejudice under certain conditions
Superordinate goals: Creating shared objectives that require cooperation between groups
Social movements demonstrate collective behavior driven by shared identity and goals
Civil rights movements, environmental activism, political revolutions