8.7 Feedback and critique

Feedback and critique are essential tools for playwrights to refine their craft. By receiving input from various sources, writers can identify strengths and weaknesses in their work, leading to more engaging and impactful plays.

Effective feedback comes in different forms, from constructive criticism to audience reactions. Playwrights must learn to process and apply feedback strategically, balancing openness to change with maintaining their artistic vision. This skill is crucial for growth and success in the field.

Importance of feedback

• Feedback is a crucial aspect of the playwriting process that helps writers identify strengths and weaknesses in their work
• Receiving constructive criticism allows playwrights to refine their craft, improve their storytelling, and create more engaging and impactful plays
• Without feedback, writers may struggle to recognize areas that need improvement or fail to realize the full potential of their scripts

Benefits for playwrights

Top images from around the web for Benefits for playwrights

• 

  A Principal's Reflections: Five Components of Good Feedback View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  A Principal's Reflections: Feedback vs Criticism View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Teaching and Learning Resources Portal/Distance Technologies/Feedback - Kumu Wiki - TRU View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  A Principal's Reflections: Five Components of Good Feedback View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  A Principal's Reflections: Feedback vs Criticism View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Benefits for playwrights

• 

  A Principal's Reflections: Five Components of Good Feedback View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  A Principal's Reflections: Feedback vs Criticism View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Teaching and Learning Resources Portal/Distance Technologies/Feedback - Kumu Wiki - TRU View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  A Principal's Reflections: Five Components of Good Feedback View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  A Principal's Reflections: Feedback vs Criticism View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Gaining fresh perspectives on their work from others who can spot issues or opportunities the writer may have overlooked
• Identifying unclear or confusing elements of the script, such as plot holes, inconsistent characterization, or awkward dialogue
• Receiving suggestions for enhancing the play's structure, pacing, themes, or emotional impact
• Boosting confidence and motivation by hearing positive reactions to strong aspects of the script

Risks of ignoring critique

• Missing opportunities to strengthen the play and make it more compelling for audiences
• Allowing weaknesses or problems in the script to persist, potentially undermining the play's success
• Failing to grow and develop as a writer by not learning from the insights and experiences of others
• Becoming too attached to one's own vision and resistant to necessary changes

Sources of feedback

• Playwrights can seek input on their work from various sources, each offering unique insights and perspectives
• Gathering feedback from multiple sources allows writers to receive a well-rounded assessment of their script's strengths and weaknesses
• Different sources may focus on different aspects of the play, such as its technical elements, emotional impact, or marketability

Workshops and readings

• Staged readings or workshop productions where actors perform the script for an audience, often followed by a discussion or Q&A session
• Provides an opportunity to hear the play aloud and gauge how well it flows, if the dialogue sounds natural, and how the audience responds
• Allows the playwright to identify areas that need clarification, cuts, or further development based on the actors' and audience's feedback

Collaborators and mentors

• Directors, dramaturgs, or other theatre professionals who offer guidance and support throughout the writing process
• Experienced mentors can share insights on craft, structure, and the realities of the theatre industry
• Collaborators may provide feedback on specific aspects of the play, such as its feasibility for staging or its alignment with the theatre's mission

Audience reactions

• Informal readings or discussions with friends, family, or other trusted individuals to gauge their reactions and impressions
• Attending productions of plays similar in style or theme to one's own work and observing how the audience responds
• Analyzing feedback from talkbacks, surveys, or online reviews to understand how audiences perceive the play's strengths and weaknesses

Types of critique

• Feedback can take various forms, each serving a different purpose in helping the playwright refine their work
• Understanding the differences between types of critique can help writers process feedback more effectively and apply it appropriately to their revisions
• Some types of feedback may be more useful at different stages of the writing process or for addressing specific aspects of the script

Constructive vs destructive

• Constructive criticism offers specific, actionable suggestions for improving the play while also acknowledging its strengths
• Destructive criticism focuses solely on the negative aspects of the work, often without providing helpful solutions or recognizing the play's potential
• Playwrights should seek out and prioritize constructive feedback that helps them grow and refine their scripts

Objective vs subjective

• Objective feedback assesses the play based on established criteria, such as its adherence to dramatic structure, clarity of themes, or effectiveness of character development
• Subjective feedback reflects the personal opinions, preferences, and emotional responses of the person providing the critique
• While both types of feedback can be valuable, playwrights should consider the source and context of subjective opinions when deciding how to apply them

Macro vs micro

• Macro feedback addresses big-picture elements of the play, such as its overall structure, pacing, character arcs, and thematic coherence
• Micro feedback focuses on smaller, more specific details, such as individual lines of dialogue, stage directions, or formatting choices
• Playwrights may prioritize macro feedback in early drafts and shift to micro feedback as the script becomes more polished

Processing feedback

• Receiving critique can be an emotional experience for playwrights, who may feel a strong attachment to their work
• Developing strategies for processing feedback effectively can help writers maintain a healthy perspective and make the most of the insights they receive
• Playwrights should approach feedback with an open mind, a willingness to learn, and a commitment to their play's growth and improvement

Emotional responses

• Acknowledging and accepting one's initial emotional reactions to feedback, whether positive or negative
• Taking time to step back and process critique before responding or making decisions about revisions
• Seeking support from trusted friends, mentors, or mental health professionals when feedback feels overwhelming or discouraging

Evaluating critique validity

• Considering the source of the feedback and their level of expertise, experience, or understanding of the playwright's goals
• Looking for patterns or recurring themes in feedback from multiple sources to identify areas that may need the most attention
• Trusting one's own instincts and judgment when feedback seems inconsistent, irrelevant, or contrary to the play's core vision

Synthesizing multiple perspectives

• Comparing and contrasting feedback from different sources to gain a comprehensive understanding of the play's strengths and weaknesses
• Identifying common threads or conflicting opinions in the critique and determining which insights resonate most strongly with the playwright's intentions
• Creating a prioritized list of potential revisions based on the most compelling and consistent feedback received

Applying feedback

• Incorporating feedback into the revision process requires careful consideration and strategic decision-making
• Playwrights should approach revisions with a clear sense of purpose, focusing on changes that enhance the play's impact and align with their artistic vision
• Effective application of feedback involves a balance of openness to change and commitment to the play's core elements

Revision strategies

• Breaking down feedback into actionable tasks and prioritizing revisions based on their potential impact on the play as a whole
• Experimenting with different approaches to addressing critique, such as rewriting scenes, cutting or combining characters, or adjusting the play's structure
• Seeking additional feedback on revised drafts to ensure that changes are effective and cohesive

Knowing when to ignore

• Recognizing when feedback may not align with the playwright's intentions or the play's central themes and making informed decisions about which suggestions to incorporate
• Trusting one's instincts and creative vision when feedback feels misguided or potentially detrimental to the play's success
• Being open to critique while also maintaining confidence in the play's core strengths and unique voice

Maintaining artistic vision

• Keeping the play's central themes, messages, and intended impact at the forefront of the revision process
• Ensuring that changes made in response to feedback enhance rather than detract from the playwright's original vision
• Communicating openly with collaborators and stakeholders about the reasoning behind revision choices and their alignment with the play's goals

Giving effective feedback

• Playwrights can benefit from learning how to provide constructive feedback to others, as it helps them develop a more critical eye for their own work
• Offering feedback requires a balance of honesty, sensitivity, and respect for the playwright's efforts and intentions
• Effective feedback should aim to help the playwright identify areas for improvement while also recognizing and encouraging the play's strengths

Focusing on the work

• Providing feedback that addresses the play itself rather than making personal judgments about the playwright
• Using specific examples from the script to illustrate points and offer concrete suggestions for improvement
• Framing feedback in terms of the play's potential impact on the audience and its effectiveness in achieving its intended goals

Balancing praise and criticism

• Acknowledging the play's strengths and successful elements to boost the playwright's confidence and motivation
• Offering constructive criticism that focuses on opportunities for growth and refinement rather than dwelling on weaknesses or shortcomings
• Using a supportive and encouraging tone that conveys a genuine desire to help the playwright succeed

Asking probing questions

• Posing open-ended questions that encourage the playwright to reflect on their choices and consider alternative approaches
• Helping the playwright identify areas where the play's intentions or themes may not be fully realized or effectively communicated
• Inviting the playwright to share their own insights and goals for the play, fostering a collaborative and dialogue-driven feedback process

Feedback throughout process

• The role and impact of feedback may vary depending on the stage of the playwriting process
• Playwrights should seek and apply feedback strategically, recognizing that different types of critique may be more valuable at certain points in the play's development
• Maintaining an openness to feedback throughout the process can help ensure that the play continues to grow and improve from initial conception to final production

Early draft considerations

• Focusing on big-picture elements such as premise, structure, and character development in early stages of writing
• Seeking feedback from trusted readers or collaborators who can offer insights on the play's potential and help identify areas for further exploration
• Being open to significant changes or revisions in response to feedback, as early drafts are often more malleable and adaptable

Late-stage refinement

• Prioritizing feedback that addresses more specific and detailed aspects of the script, such as dialogue, pacing, and staging
• Seeking input from a wider range of sources, including actors, directors, and potential audience members, to gauge the play's effectiveness and impact
• Making targeted revisions that enhance the play's overall polish and cohesion while staying true to its core vision and themes

Post-production reflections

• Gathering and analyzing feedback from audiences, critics, and collaborators after the play's production or public reading
• Reflecting on the play's successes and shortcomings in light of its reception and considering potential revisions for future productions or publications
• Applying lessons learned from the production process to inform and strengthen future playwriting projects and collaborations