You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides
You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides

The concept champions equal access and participation for all urban dwellers in shaping their environment. It challenges the commodification of urban spaces and emphasizes collective power to transform cities through political action and social movements.

Originating from 's work and expanded by , this idea has sparked global movements. From Brazil's City Statute to Barcelona's progressive policies, the right to the city confronts challenges like and privatization while promoting strategies for more inclusive urban futures.

Right to the city concept

  • Explores the idea that all urban inhabitants should have equal access to and participation in shaping the city and its spaces
  • Emphasizes the collective power of urban residents to transform and democratize the city
  • Challenges the commodification and privatization of urban spaces that prioritize profit over social needs

Right to the city vs right to urban life

  • Right to the city focuses on the collective right to shape and transform the city through political action and social movements
  • Right to urban life emphasizes individual access to urban amenities, services, and opportunities without necessarily challenging power structures
  • Right to the city seeks systemic change in urban governance and decision-making, while right to urban life focuses on improving quality of life within existing systems

Right to the city origins

Henri Lefebvre's right to the city

Top images from around the web for Henri Lefebvre's right to the city
Top images from around the web for Henri Lefebvre's right to the city
  • French philosopher and sociologist who introduced the concept in his 1968 book "Le Droit à la ville" (The Right to the City)
  • Argued that the city is a collective work of art shaped by its inhabitants, not just a commodity for exchange and profit
  • Envisioned the right to the city as a revolutionary demand for the democratization of urban space and decision-making
  • Emphasized the importance of everyday life, lived experiences, and the creativity of urban inhabitants in shaping the city

David Harvey's right to the city

  • British geographer and social theorist who has expanded on Lefebvre's ideas and applied them to contemporary urban struggles
  • Defines the right to the city as the collective right to shape the urbanization process and to make the city a site of democratic participation and social justice
  • Argues that the right to the city is a human right that has been eroded by neoliberal policies and the commodification of urban space
  • Emphasizes the role of social movements and grassroots activism in reclaiming the right to the city and challenging the power of capital and the state

Right to the city movements

Right to the city alliance

  • A national alliance of community-based organizations, tenant unions, and social justice groups in the United States
  • Formed in 2007 to advocate for affordable housing, tenant rights, community control of land, and democratic participation in urban planning
  • Organizes campaigns, direct actions, and policy advocacy to challenge gentrification, displacement, and the privatization of public spaces
  • Builds solidarity and shared strategies among local struggles for the right to the city across different cities and regions

Right to the city in Brazil

  • Brazil has a strong history of urban social movements and struggles for the right to the city, particularly in the context of rapid urbanization and inequality
  • The City Statute of 2001 enshrined the right to the city in national law, recognizing the social function of property and the need for participatory urban planning
  • Participatory budgeting, first implemented in Porto Alegre in 1989, has become a model for democratic urban governance and has spread to other cities in Brazil and beyond
  • such as the Movimento dos Trabalhadores Sem Teto (MTST) have occupied vacant buildings and land to demand affordable housing and resist evictions and displacement

Right to the city challenges

Privatization of public spaces

  • The increasing trend of privatizing parks, plazas, and other public spaces through mechanisms such as business improvement districts (BIDs) and public-private partnerships
  • Privatization often leads to the exclusion of marginalized groups, the criminalization of informal activities, and the erosion of public life and democratic access to the city
  • Challenges the notion of the city as a commons and a site of collective social interaction and political expression

Gentrification and displacement

  • The process by which low-income and working-class neighborhoods are transformed through an influx of capital and higher-income residents, often leading to rising rents and the displacement of long-term residents
  • Gentrification is often driven by speculative real estate investment, urban redevelopment policies, and the commodification of urban space
  • Displacement not only uproots individuals and families but also disrupts social networks, cultural practices, and the sense of belonging to a place

Exclusion and marginalization

  • The systematic exclusion of certain groups (based on race, class, gender, sexuality, immigration status, etc.) from full participation in urban life and decision-making
  • Exclusion can take the form of spatial segregation, unequal access to services and amenities, police violence and criminalization, and political disenfranchisement
  • Marginalization reinforces and reproduces social inequalities and hinders the realization of the right to the city for all inhabitants

Right to the city strategies

Participatory urban planning

  • Involves the active participation of community members and stakeholders in the planning and design of urban spaces and policies
  • Can take the form of community visioning workshops, design charrettes, participatory budgeting, and other collaborative processes
  • Aims to democratize urban planning and ensure that the needs and desires of diverse communities are reflected in the built environment and urban policies
  • Challenges the top-down, technocratic approach to urban planning that often prioritizes the interests of developers and elites over those of everyday inhabitants

Community land trusts

  • A model of community-owned and managed land that removes land from the speculative market and ensures long-term affordability and community control
  • CLTs acquire land through purchase or donation and then lease it to homeowners, cooperatives, or other entities with provisions for permanent affordability and democratic governance
  • Provide a mechanism for communities to resist gentrification and displacement and to preserve affordable housing, green spaces, and community facilities
  • Examples include the Dudley Street Neighborhood Initiative in Boston, the Champlain Housing Trust in Burlington, Vermont, and the London Community Land Trust in the UK

Cooperative housing models

  • Housing that is collectively owned and managed by its residents, often through a democratic decision-making process
  • Can take the form of limited-equity cooperatives, mutual housing associations, or other shared-ownership models
  • Provide an alternative to both private rental housing and individual homeownership, emphasizing affordability, community control, and social solidarity
  • Examples include the Bain Co-op in Toronto, the Mutual Housing Association of New York (MHANY), and the Mietshäuser Syndikat in Germany

Right to the city case studies

Right to the city in Barcelona

  • Barcelona has been at the forefront of municipal movements for the right to the city, particularly since the election of the progressive Barcelona en Comú platform in 2015
  • Initiatives have included participatory budgeting, the remunicipalisation of water and energy services, the expansion of public housing, and the creation of superblocks to reclaim public space from cars
  • The city has also been a leader in the development of digital platforms for citizen participation and the sharing economy, such as Decidim and the FLOSS (Free/Libre Open Source Software) movement
  • Challenges have included tensions with the Catalan and Spanish governments, the impact of tourism and gentrification, and the need to deepen and sustain

Right to the city in Johannesburg

  • Johannesburg has a long history of spatial inequality and racial segregation, rooted in the legacy of apartheid and exacerbated by neoliberal urban policies in the post-apartheid era
  • Social movements such as Abahlali baseMjondolo and the Anti-Privatisation Forum have mobilized shack dwellers and poor communities to resist evictions, demand basic services, and claim their right to the city
  • The city government has adopted progressive policies such as the Spatial Development Framework and the Inclusionary Housing Policy to promote and affordable housing, but implementation has been uneven
  • Challenges include the persistence of informal settlements, the impact of mega-projects such as the Gautrain and the 2010 World Cup, and the need for more participatory and inclusive urban governance

Right to the city critiques

Right to the city limitations

  • The right to the city is a powerful concept, but it can be difficult to translate into concrete policies and practices, particularly in the face of entrenched power structures and vested interests
  • The right to the city can be interpreted in different ways, and there is a risk of co-optation by neoliberal or authoritarian forces that use the language of rights and participation to legitimize their own agendas
  • The right to the city may not fully address the global dimensions of urbanization and the need for solidarity and coordination among struggles in different cities and regions

Right to the city co-optation

  • There is a risk that the language and practices of the right to the city can be co-opted by developers, politicians, and other actors who use them to legitimize their own interests and projects
  • For example, participatory planning processes can be used to generate community buy-in for gentrification and displacement, or the rhetoric of the right to the city can be used to justify the privatization of public spaces and services
  • Co-optation can also take the form of tokenistic or superficial forms of participation that do not fundamentally challenge power relations or address the root causes of urban inequalities

Right to the city future directions

Right to the city and climate justice

  • The right to the city is increasingly linked to struggles for climate justice, as the impacts of climate change are felt most acutely by marginalized and vulnerable urban communities
  • Urban social movements are mobilizing to demand climate action, energy democracy, and a just transition to a post-carbon economy that prioritizes the needs and rights of frontline communities
  • Initiatives such as community-owned renewable energy, green infrastructure, and climate resilience planning can be seen as expressions of the right to the city in the face of climate change
  • Challenges include the need to build alliances between environmental and social justice movements, and to confront the power of fossil fuel corporations and other vested interests

Right to the city and digital rights

  • The right to the city is increasingly intertwined with struggles for digital rights and the democratization of technology in the context of smart cities, platform urbanism, and the surveillance economy
  • Urban social movements are mobilizing to demand digital inclusion, data sovereignty, and the protection of privacy and civil liberties in the face of corporate and state surveillance
  • Initiatives such as community-owned broadband networks, open-source software, and participatory digital platforms can be seen as expressions of the right to the city in the digital age
  • Challenges include the need to build digital literacy and capacity among marginalized communities, and to confront the power of tech corporations and the state in shaping the digital infrastructure of cities
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Glossary