🪄Political Philosophy Unit 14 – Global Justice: Fanon, Sen, and Pogge
Global justice theories examine inequality, poverty, and human rights on a global scale. Thinkers like Fanon, Sen, and Pogge have shaped this field by critiquing colonialism, emphasizing individual capabilities, and highlighting structural injustices in the global economic order.
These approaches challenge traditional views of justice, emphasizing the need for a global perspective. They've influenced debates on issues like poverty, climate change, and development, providing frameworks for evaluating global institutions and policies. Their ideas continue to shape contemporary discussions on global challenges.
Frantz Fanon (1925-1961) was a psychiatrist, philosopher, and revolutionary who critiqued colonialism and its impact on the colonized
Developed ideas about the psychological effects of colonialism, arguing it creates a sense of inferiority and alienation among the colonized
Amartya Sen (1933-present) is an economist and philosopher known for his work on welfare economics, social choice theory, and the capability approach
Introduced the concept of "development as freedom" emphasizing the importance of individual agency and substantive freedoms
Thomas Pogge (1953-present) is a political philosopher who has made significant contributions to the field of global justice and poverty
Argues that the global economic order perpetuates poverty and that wealthy nations have a moral obligation to address global poverty
Other notable thinkers in global justice include John Rawls (justice as fairness), Peter Singer (effective altruism), and Martha Nussbaum (capabilities approach)
Historical Context and Background
Global justice emerged as a distinct field of inquiry in the late 20th century, drawing from political philosophy, economics, and international relations
Decolonization movements of the mid-20th century (India, Africa) highlighted the need to address the legacies of colonialism and global inequality
The end of the Cold War and the acceleration of globalization in the 1990s brought renewed attention to issues of global poverty, inequality, and development
The United Nations Millennium Development Goals (2000) and Sustainable Development Goals (2015) reflect growing international consensus on the need to address global challenges
Recent events such as the COVID-19 pandemic and climate change have underscored the interconnectedness of global issues and the importance of global cooperation
Core Concepts in Global Justice
Distributive justice concerns the fair allocation of resources, opportunities, and burdens within and between societies
Includes issues such as global poverty, inequality, and access to healthcare and education
Human rights are the basic rights and freedoms that all individuals are entitled to, regardless of nationality, ethnicity, religion, or other status
Includes civil and political rights (free speech, due process) as well as economic, social, and cultural rights (education, healthcare)
Global governance refers to the institutions, norms, and processes that shape collective action on global issues
Includes international organizations (UN, World Bank), international law, and global civil society
Cosmopolitanism is the idea that all individuals have equal moral worth and that our ethical obligations extend beyond national borders
Contrasts with nationalism and realism, which prioritize national interests and state sovereignty
Environmental justice recognizes the disproportionate impact of environmental harms on marginalized communities and the need for equitable access to environmental benefits
Includes issues such as climate change, pollution, and access to clean water and air
Fanon's Critique of Colonialism
In works such as "Black Skin, White Masks" (1952) and "The Wretched of the Earth" (1961), Fanon analyzed the psychological and social impact of colonialism on the colonized
Argued that colonialism creates a Manichean world divided between the colonizer and the colonized, with the colonized internalizing a sense of inferiority and self-hatred
The colonized individual is alienated from their own culture and identity, leading to a state of "double consciousness"
Colonialism is maintained through violence, both physical and psychological, which dehumanizes the colonized and justifies their oppression
The colonized may internalize this violence and turn it against themselves (self-destructive behavior) or their own community (horizontal violence)
Decolonization requires not only political and economic liberation but also a psychological and cultural reclamation of the colonized self
This may involve a violent struggle against the colonizer, which Fanon saw as a necessary part of the decolonization process
Fanon's work has been influential in postcolonial studies, critical race theory, and liberation movements around the world (Algeria, South Africa, Palestine)
Sen's Capability Approach
Sen's capability approach focuses on what individuals are able to do and be, rather than just their income or resources
Capabilities are the substantive freedoms that individuals have to lead the kind of life they have reason to value
Poverty is understood as capability deprivation, not just low income
Includes lack of access to education, healthcare, political freedoms, and social opportunities
Development should be evaluated in terms of the expansion of individual capabilities, not just economic growth
"Development as freedom" emphasizes the importance of removing obstacles to individual agency and choice
The capability approach has been influential in the United Nations Human Development Index (HDI), which measures development in terms of life expectancy, education, and standard of living
Critics argue that the capability approach is difficult to operationalize and measure, and that it may not adequately address structural inequalities and power relations
Pogge's Theory of Global Poverty
Pogge argues that the global economic order is designed to benefit wealthy nations at the expense of the global poor
Includes unfair trade agreements, debt burdens, and the "resource privilege" which allows corrupt leaders to sell natural resources without benefiting their citizens
Wealthy nations have a negative duty not to harm the global poor, as well as a positive duty to assist them
This is based on the idea that poverty is a human rights violation and that we have a moral obligation to address it
Proposes a "Global Resources Dividend" (GRD) which would tax the use of natural resources and redistribute the funds to the global poor
The GRD would be a form of compensation for the unjust appropriation of resources by wealthy nations
Criticizes the "explanatory nationalism" which attributes poverty to domestic factors (corruption, poor governance) while ignoring the role of global factors
Pogge's work has been influential in debates on global poverty, foreign aid, and the responsibilities of wealthy nations
Comparative Analysis of Approaches
Fanon, Sen, and Pogge offer distinct but complementary approaches to global justice
Fanon focuses on the psychological and cultural dimensions of colonialism and decolonization
Sen emphasizes the importance of individual capabilities and substantive freedoms
Pogge highlights the structural injustices of the global economic order
All three thinkers challenge traditional liberal approaches to justice which focus on individual rights and domestic institutions
They argue that justice must be understood in a global context, taking into account the legacies of colonialism and the interconnectedness of the global economy
There are tensions between the approaches, such as Fanon's emphasis on violence and Pogge's focus on institutional reform
Sen's capability approach may be seen as a middle ground, emphasizing both individual agency and the importance of social and economic conditions
The approaches can be combined in productive ways, such as using the capability approach to evaluate the impact of colonialism or the global economic order on individual freedoms
Real-World Applications and Case Studies
The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) reflect many of the principles of global justice, such as ending poverty, reducing inequality, and promoting environmental sustainability
The SDGs have been criticized for being too broad and lacking accountability mechanisms
The Fair Trade movement seeks to promote more equitable trading relationships between producers in developing countries and consumers in wealthy nations
Fair Trade has been successful in raising awareness about global poverty and inequality, but has also been criticized for its limited impact and potential to reinforce power imbalances
The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted global inequalities in access to healthcare, vaccines, and economic relief
Wealthy nations have been criticized for "vaccine nationalism" and failing to support global efforts to distribute vaccines equitably
Climate change is a global justice issue, as its impacts are disproportionately felt by poor and marginalized communities around the world
The Paris Agreement and other international efforts to address climate change have been criticized for not going far enough to support vulnerable populations and hold wealthy nations accountable
Criticisms and Debates
Some critics argue that global justice theories are too abstract and fail to provide concrete guidance for policy and action
There are debates about how to operationalize concepts like capabilities, human rights, and global governance
Others argue that global justice theories are too idealistic and fail to take into account the realities of international politics and power relations
Realists argue that states will always prioritize their own interests and that global cooperation is limited by the anarchic structure of the international system
There are debates about the scope and limits of global obligations, such as how much wealthy nations owe to the global poor and whether there are limits to cosmopolitan duties
Some argue that global obligations must be balanced against domestic obligations and that states have a primary duty to their own citizens
Critics argue that global justice theories may reinforce Western values and norms, and fail to take into account diverse cultural and political contexts
There are debates about the universality of human rights and whether global justice requires a more pluralistic and contextualized approach
Impact on Contemporary Global Issues
Global justice theories have influenced debates on a wide range of contemporary issues, from global health and poverty to climate change and migration
They have provided a normative framework for evaluating the justice of global institutions, policies, and practices
The capability approach has been influential in development policy, emphasizing the importance of human development and individual agency
It has also been applied to issues such as education, health, and gender equality
Pogge's work on global poverty has challenged the dominant narrative of poverty as a domestic issue and highlighted the role of global factors such as trade, debt, and resource extraction
It has also inspired campaigns for debt relief, fair trade, and reform of the global economic order
Fanon's critique of colonialism has been influential in anti-racist and decolonial movements, emphasizing the need for psychological and cultural liberation as well as political and economic change
It has also been applied to contemporary issues such as police violence, mass incarceration, and the legacy of slavery and apartheid
Global justice theories have also highlighted the importance of global civil society and social movements in promoting change and holding powerful actors accountable
This includes movements such as the World Social Forum, the Global Justice Movement, and the Climate Justice Movement