1.3 Institutional theory

Institutional theory examines how organizations are influenced by their social and cultural environments. It explores how external pressures shape organizational structures, practices, and behaviors, often leading to similarities among organizations in the same field.

Key concepts include organizational fields, isomorphism, and legitimacy. The theory also delves into institutional pressures, competing logics, and the processes of institutional change. Understanding these ideas helps explain why organizations often prioritize conformity over efficiency.

Origins of institutional theory

• Institutional theory emerged as a response to the limitations of rational-actor models in explaining organizational behavior
• Draws on insights from sociology, political science, and economics to understand how organizations are shaped by their institutional environments
• Early contributions include the work of Philip Selznick, who emphasized the importance of organizational values and commitments in shaping organizational behavior

Key concepts in institutional theory

Organizational fields

Top images from around the web for Organizational fields

• 

  The Effective Organization: Five Questions to Translate Leadership into Strong Management ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Factors Impacting Organizational Design | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Epistemological Character of Isomorphism in Generation of Innovation View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Effective Organization: Five Questions to Translate Leadership into Strong Management ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Factors Impacting Organizational Design | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Organizational fields

• 

  The Effective Organization: Five Questions to Translate Leadership into Strong Management ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Factors Impacting Organizational Design | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Epistemological Character of Isomorphism in Generation of Innovation View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Effective Organization: Five Questions to Translate Leadership into Strong Management ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Factors Impacting Organizational Design | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Refers to a set of organizations that constitute a recognized area of institutional life (healthcare, education)
• Organizations within a field are subject to similar institutional pressures and tend to become more similar over time
• Fields are characterized by shared understandings, norms, and rules that guide organizational behavior

Isomorphism

• Process by which organizations within a field become more similar over time
• Three main types of isomorphism: coercive (pressures from other organizations), mimetic (imitation of successful organizations), and normative (pressures from professionalization)
• Isomorphism can lead to increased legitimacy but may also reduce organizational diversity and adaptability

Legitimacy

• Refers to the perception that an organization's actions are desirable, proper, or appropriate within its institutional environment
• Organizations seek legitimacy to gain access to resources, enhance their stability, and increase their chances of survival
• Legitimacy can be based on conformity to legal requirements, social norms, or cultural expectations

Institutional pressures

Coercive pressures

• Stem from political influence and the problem of legitimacy
• Includes both formal pressures (laws, regulations) and informal pressures (cultural expectations)
• Organizations may be required to adopt certain practices or structures to maintain their legitimacy

Mimetic pressures

• Result from standard responses to uncertainty
• Organizations imitate the practices of successful or prominent organizations in their field
• Mimetic pressures can lead to the diffusion of best practices but may also result in the adoption of suboptimal practices

Normative pressures

• Associated with professionalization and the influence of professional norms and values
• Includes pressures from professional associations, educational institutions, and other sources of professional socialization
• Normative pressures can promote the adoption of appropriate practices but may also limit organizational flexibility

Institutional logics

Competing institutional logics

• Refers to the presence of multiple, potentially conflicting sets of norms, values, and beliefs within an organizational field
• Organizations may face pressures to conform to different logics simultaneously (market logic vs. social welfare logic)
• Competing logics can create challenges for organizational decision-making and identity

Institutional complexity

• Occurs when organizations are subject to multiple, conflicting institutional demands
• Organizations may respond to institutional complexity by decoupling (separating formal structures from actual practices) or by creating hybrid organizational forms
• Institutional complexity can create opportunities for organizational innovation but may also lead to organizational paralysis or instability

Institutional change

Institutional entrepreneurs

• Actors who leverage resources to create new institutions or transform existing ones
• Institutional entrepreneurs may be individuals, organizations, or social movements
• Successful institutional entrepreneurship requires the ability to mobilize resources, frame issues, and build coalitions

Deinstitutionalization vs reinstitutionalization

• Deinstitutionalization refers to the erosion or discontinuity of an institutionalized practice or structure
• Reinstitutionalization involves the creation of new institutions or the transformation of existing ones
• Institutional change often involves cycles of deinstitutionalization and reinstitutionalization as actors challenge and reshape existing institutional arrangements

Institutional work

Creating institutions

• Involves the establishment of new rules, norms, or beliefs within an organizational field
• May involve the creation of new organizational forms, practices, or identities
• Requires the mobilization of resources and the framing of issues in ways that resonate with key stakeholders

Maintaining institutions

• Involves the ongoing work of supporting and reproducing existing institutional arrangements
• May involve the policing of organizational behavior, the socialization of new members, or the reinforcement of existing norms and values
• Maintaining institutions can be challenging in the face of external pressures or internal contradictions

Disrupting institutions

• Involves the intentional disruption or destabilization of existing institutional arrangements
• May involve the introduction of new ideas, practices, or organizational forms that challenge the status quo
• Disrupting institutions can be risky but may also create opportunities for innovation and change

Institutions and power

Institutions as sources of power

• Institutions can confer power and authority on certain actors or organizations within a field
• Powerful actors may use their influence to shape the institutional environment in ways that benefit their interests
• Institutions can also serve as a source of resistance to power by providing a basis for collective action and mobilization

Power dynamics in organizational fields

• Organizational fields are characterized by power imbalances and struggles between different actors and interest groups
• Dominant organizations may use their power to maintain the status quo, while peripheral organizations may challenge existing arrangements
• Power dynamics can shape the evolution of organizational fields and the diffusion of practices and ideas

Institutions and organizational behavior

Institutional constraints on decision-making

• Institutional pressures can limit the range of options available to organizational decision-makers
• Organizations may be constrained by legal requirements, social norms, or cultural expectations in their decision-making processes
• Institutional constraints can lead to suboptimal decisions but may also provide a basis for organizational legitimacy

Institutional influences on organizational structure

• Institutional pressures can shape the formal structure of organizations, including their hierarchies, departments, and control systems
• Organizations may adopt certain structures or practices to signal their conformity to institutional expectations
• Institutional influences on structure can lead to the homogenization of organizational forms within a field

Critiques of institutional theory

Overemphasis on stability vs change

• Some critics argue that institutional theory places too much emphasis on the stability and persistence of institutions
• This may lead to an underestimation of the potential for organizational change and innovation
• More recent work in institutional theory has sought to address this critique by examining the processes of institutional change and entrepreneurship

Neglect of agency and strategic action

• Critics have argued that institutional theory downplays the role of agency and strategic action in shaping organizational behavior
• This may lead to a deterministic view of organizations as passive recipients of institutional pressures
• Recent work has sought to incorporate a greater focus on agency and strategic action within an institutional framework

Applications of institutional theory

Institutional theory in different sectors

• Institutional theory has been applied to a wide range of organizational sectors, including business, education, healthcare, and nonprofits
• The specific institutional pressures and dynamics may vary across sectors, but the basic principles of institutional theory remain relevant
• Applying institutional theory to different sectors can provide insights into the unique challenges and opportunities facing organizations in those sectors

Cross-cultural applications of institutional theory

• Institutional theory has increasingly been applied to understanding organizational behavior in different cultural contexts
• Cultural differences may shape the specific institutional pressures and expectations facing organizations in different countries or regions
• Applying institutional theory cross-culturally can provide insights into the ways in which institutions are shaped by and shape cultural values and practices