7.2 Bounded rationality

Bounded rationality challenges the idea of perfect decision-making in organizations. It recognizes that humans have cognitive limitations, incomplete information, and time constraints that affect their choices. This concept helps explain why decisions often deviate from purely rational models.

Understanding bounded rationality is crucial for grasping power dynamics in organizations. It sheds light on how cognitive biases can be exploited, how powerful actors influence decisions, and how participatory processes can counterbalance top-down structures. This knowledge is essential for navigating organizational politics effectively.

Concept of bounded rationality

• Bounded rationality is the idea that human decision-making is limited by cognitive constraints, incomplete information, and time pressures
• Contrasts with the classical economic view of perfect rationality assumes individuals have complete information, unlimited cognitive abilities, and make optimal decisions
• Recognizes that decision-makers in organizations often operate under conditions of uncertainty and complexity which limit their ability to make fully rational choices

Limitations of human cognition

Cognitive biases and heuristics

Top images from around the web for Cognitive biases and heuristics

• 

  Cognitive Biases - Sensemaking Resources, Education, and Community View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Raconteur – Cognitive Bias View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Cognitive bias cheat sheet – Better Humans View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Cognitive Biases - Sensemaking Resources, Education, and Community View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Raconteur – Cognitive Bias View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Cognitive biases and heuristics

• 

  Cognitive Biases - Sensemaking Resources, Education, and Community View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Raconteur – Cognitive Bias View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Cognitive bias cheat sheet – Better Humans View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Cognitive Biases - Sensemaking Resources, Education, and Community View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Raconteur – Cognitive Bias View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Cognitive biases are systematic errors in thinking that influence judgment and decision-making (confirmation bias, anchoring bias)
• Heuristics are mental shortcuts or rules of thumb used to simplify complex decisions (availability heuristic, representativeness heuristic)
• These cognitive limitations can lead to suboptimal decisions that deviate from rational choice theory
  • For example, confirmation bias may cause decision-makers to seek out information that confirms their existing beliefs while ignoring contradictory evidence
  • The availability heuristic may lead people to overestimate the likelihood of events that are easily remembered or imagined

Incomplete information and uncertainty

• Decision-makers often lack complete information about the problem, potential solutions, and future consequences
• Uncertainty arises from complex, dynamic environments where relevant variables are unknown or unpredictable
• Incomplete information and uncertainty make it difficult to evaluate all possible alternatives and their outcomes
  • For instance, managers may have to make strategic decisions without full knowledge of market conditions, competitor actions, or technological developments

Time and resource constraints

• Real-world decision-making often occurs under time pressure with limited resources available for gathering and processing information
• These constraints force decision-makers to prioritize some factors over others and make trade-offs
• Time and resource limitations can lead to satisficing rather than optimizing decisions
  • A manager facing a tight deadline may choose a satisfactory solution that meets minimum requirements instead of searching for the optimal choice

Satisficing vs optimizing decisions

• Satisficing is settling for a good enough option that meets a threshold of acceptability, while optimizing involves seeking the best possible alternative
• Bounded rationality suggests that decision-makers often satisfice due to cognitive limitations, incomplete information, and resource constraints
• Satisficing can be an efficient strategy when the costs of gathering and processing information outweigh the benefits of finding the optimal solution
  • For example, a company may satisfice by choosing a supplier that meets basic criteria rather than exhaustively evaluating all potential suppliers to find the absolute best one

Bounded rationality in organizations

Effects on decision-making processes

• Bounded rationality influences how organizations structure their decision-making processes and routines
• Organizations may simplify complex decisions by relying on standard operating procedures, rules of thumb, or existing precedents
• Cognitive limitations can lead to incremental rather than radical changes as decision-makers make small adjustments based on feedback and experience
  • For instance, a company may make minor tweaks to its product line based on customer feedback rather than completely overhauling its offerings

Implications for organizational structure

• Bounded rationality affects how organizations are designed and structured to enable effective decision-making
• Hierarchical structures can help manage complexity by breaking decisions into smaller, more manageable components at each level
• Decentralization and specialization allow for division of labor and local expertise to address specific aspects of a problem
  • A large corporation may have separate departments focused on marketing, finance, and operations to handle decisions within their respective domains

Strategies to mitigate bounded rationality

• Organizations can adopt various strategies to minimize the impact of bounded rationality on decision-making
• Encouraging diverse perspectives, devil's advocacy, and constructive conflict can help challenge assumptions and reduce bias
• Establishing clear decision criteria, gathering relevant data, and involving stakeholders can improve the quality of information available
• Building in flexibility, experimentation, and learning mechanisms allows for adaptation as new information emerges
  • A startup may use rapid prototyping and customer feedback loops to iteratively improve its product based on real-world data

Bounded rationality and power dynamics

Exploitation of cognitive limitations

• Powerful actors can exploit the cognitive limitations of others to shape decisions in their favor
• Framing issues, controlling information flows, and setting agendas are ways to influence how problems and solutions are perceived
• Emotion, charisma, and social proof can be used to sway opinions and build coalitions around preferred alternatives
  • A charismatic CEO may rally support for a risky acquisition by framing it as a bold, visionary move and downplaying potential drawbacks

Influence of powerful actors

• Bounded rationality can amplify the influence of powerful individuals or groups in organizational decision-making
• Those with formal authority, expertise, or control over resources can have disproportionate sway over choices
• Power imbalances can lead to decisions that serve the interests of dominant actors rather than the organization as a whole
  • A department head may push for projects that expand their own power and budget while neglecting the needs of other units

Bounded rationality as a power equalizer

• In some cases, bounded rationality can level the playing field and give less powerful actors a voice in decision-making
• When facing complex, uncertain problems, the specialized knowledge and perspectives of lower-level employees may be valuable
• Participatory decision-making processes that tap into the collective intelligence of the organization can counterbalance top-down power structures
  • A front-line worker may spot emerging issues or opportunities that senior executives are unaware of due to their distance from day-to-day operations

Critiques and alternative perspectives

Challenges to the bounded rationality model

• Some researchers argue that the bounded rationality framework is too pessimistic about human decision-making capabilities
• Critics contend that people can learn from experience, use tools and strategies to enhance their cognitive abilities, and make reasonably good decisions most of the time
• Others suggest that the focus on individual cognitive limitations neglects the role of social and institutional factors in shaping organizational decisions
  • For example, group dynamics, cultural norms, and political processes may be more important than individual bounded rationality in some contexts

Integration with other decision-making theories

• Bounded rationality can be integrated with other perspectives on organizational decision-making, such as the garbage can model or institutional theory
• The garbage can model emphasizes the role of chance, timing, and attention in shaping which problems and solutions get paired together
• Institutional theory highlights how decision-making is constrained by taken-for-granted assumptions, myths, and expectations in the broader environment
  • A non-profit organization's decisions may be influenced by the need to conform to industry standards and maintain legitimacy with funders, even if these choices are not objectively optimal

Applications and examples

Case studies of bounded rationality in action

• The Cuban Missile Crisis illustrates how cognitive biases, time pressure, and incomplete information can shape high-stakes decision-making in international relations
• The Challenger and Columbia space shuttle disasters demonstrate how organizational culture, communication breakdowns, and flawed heuristics can lead to tragic outcomes
• The 2008 financial crisis shows how individual and collective bounded rationality in the banking industry contributed to systemic risk and market failure
  • Overconfidence, herd behavior, and reliance on oversimplified models blinded many actors to the mounting dangers in the housing market and derivatives trading

Bounded rationality in various contexts

• In strategic management, bounded rationality affects how firms make decisions about market entry, resource allocation, and competitive positioning
• In public policy, bounded rationality influences how legislators, regulators, and citizens approach complex societal problems like climate change or healthcare reform
• In consumer behavior, bounded rationality shapes how individuals make purchasing decisions based on limited information, cognitive shortcuts, and emotional factors
  • Marketers can exploit cognitive biases through advertising, product design, and choice architecture to influence consumer preferences and actions