2.4 Agency Issues: Shareholders and Corporate Boards

Corporate governance addresses conflicts between shareholders and managers, aiming to align their interests. Agency costs, stakeholder conflicts, and shareholder rights are key issues. Mechanisms like board oversight, executive compensation, and auditing help minimize agency problems and protect shareholder interests.

ESG criteria evaluate a company's environmental, social, and governance practices. These factors impact risk management, reputation, and financial performance. While ESG initiatives may have short-term costs, studies generally show a neutral to positive relationship with long-term stock performance.

Agency Issues and Corporate Governance

Agency costs in corporate governance

Top images from around the web for Agency costs in corporate governance

• 

  Corporate Governance in Nigerian Banks: a Theoretical Review - Research leap View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Information and Analytical Support for Security Management: Conflicts Monitoring in Corporate ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Corporate Law and Corporate Responsibility – Business Ethics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Corporate Governance in Nigerian Banks: a Theoretical Review - Research leap View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Information and Analytical Support for Security Management: Conflicts Monitoring in Corporate ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Agency costs in corporate governance

• 

  Corporate Governance in Nigerian Banks: a Theoretical Review - Research leap View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Information and Analytical Support for Security Management: Conflicts Monitoring in Corporate ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Corporate Law and Corporate Responsibility – Business Ethics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Corporate Governance in Nigerian Banks: a Theoretical Review - Research leap View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Information and Analytical Support for Security Management: Conflicts Monitoring in Corporate ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Agency costs arise when there are conflicts of interest between principals (shareholders) and agents (managers) in a company
  • Shareholders aim to maximize their wealth and returns on investment, while managers may prioritize personal benefits, perks, or empire building (expanding the company beyond optimal size)
• Types of agency costs include:
  1. Monitoring costs: Expenses incurred by shareholders to oversee and control managerial behavior (hiring auditors, implementing reporting systems)
  2. Bonding costs: Expenses incurred by managers to assure shareholders that they will act in the shareholders' best interests (contractual obligations, performance guarantees)
  3. Residual loss: The reduction in shareholder value due to divergent interests between shareholders and managers, despite monitoring and bonding efforts
• Corporate governance mechanisms help minimize agency costs by aligning the interests of shareholders and managers
  • Board of directors serves as a representative of shareholders' interests and monitors management's actions and decisions
    • Board independence is crucial to ensure effective oversight and protect shareholder interests
  • Executive compensation packages align managerial incentives with shareholder objectives through stock options and performance-based pay (bonuses tied to stock price or profitability)
  • External auditors provide independent verification of financial statements to ensure transparency and accountability to shareholders

Stakeholder conflicts of interest

• Shareholders vs. Managers
  • Shareholders seek to maximize their returns and the value of their investments, while managers may prioritize job security, perks (corporate jets, lavish offices), or empire building
  • Managers may engage in risk-averse behavior to protect their positions, potentially forgoing valuable investment opportunities that could benefit shareholders
• Shareholders vs. Bondholders
  • Shareholders prefer higher-risk, higher-return projects that can increase stock prices, while bondholders prefer lower-risk projects to ensure timely interest and principal payments
  • Shareholders may support excessive dividend payouts or share repurchases, reducing the assets available to repay bondholders in case of financial distress
• Majority vs. Minority Shareholders
  • Majority shareholders may exploit their control over the company to benefit themselves at the expense of minority shareholders
  • Examples include related-party transactions (deals with companies owned by majority shareholders), insider trading, or diverting corporate resources for personal gain (using company funds for private expenses)

Shareholder Rights and Corporate Control

• Shareholder activism involves investors using their ownership rights to influence company policies and practices
• Proxy voting allows shareholders to participate in corporate decision-making without attending meetings in person
• Hostile takeovers occur when an acquiring company attempts to gain control without the target company's management approval
• Corporate social responsibility initiatives aim to balance profit-making activities with actions that benefit society and the environment

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Criteria

Components of ESG criteria

• Environmental factors consider a company's impact on the natural environment and its efforts to mitigate negative effects
  • Climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies (reducing carbon footprint, investing in renewable energy)
  • Greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets and performance
  • Energy efficiency measures and renewable energy usage in operations
  • Waste management and pollution control practices (recycling, proper disposal of hazardous materials)
  • Water management and conservation efforts (reducing consumption, treating wastewater)
• Social factors assess a company's relationships with its employees, customers, and the communities in which it operates
  • Labor standards and working conditions (fair wages, safe workplaces, no child or forced labor)
  • Diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives (hiring practices, equal opportunities, anti-discrimination policies)
  • Human rights and community relations (respecting indigenous rights, supporting local development)
  • Product safety and liability considerations (quality control, recall procedures)
  • Data privacy and security measures to protect customer and employee information
• Governance factors evaluate a company's leadership, decision-making processes, and accountability to stakeholders
  • Board composition and independence (diverse backgrounds, no conflicts of interest)
  • Executive compensation structures that align with long-term shareholder interests
  • Shareholder rights and activism (voting rights, ability to propose resolutions)
  • Business ethics and anti-corruption measures (code of conduct, whistleblower protections)
  • Risk management and internal controls to prevent fraud and ensure compliance

ESG policies vs stock performance

• Positive effects of ESG on stock performance:
  • Improved risk management: Considering ESG factors helps identify and mitigate long-term risks (reputational, regulatory, environmental), leading to more stable returns over time
  • Enhanced reputation and customer loyalty: Companies with strong ESG practices may attract and retain customers who value sustainability and social responsibility, boosting sales and profitability
  • Lower cost of capital: Investors may perceive ESG-focused companies as less risky, resulting in lower borrowing costs and higher valuations
• Potential negative effects of ESG on stock performance:
  • Short-term costs: Implementing ESG initiatives may require upfront investments (upgrading equipment, training employees), temporarily reducing profitability
  • Reduced investment universe: Strict ESG screening may limit portfolio diversification and potential returns by excluding certain sectors or companies
• Empirical evidence on the relationship between ESG and stock performance is mixed but generally positive
  • Many studies suggest a positive relationship between strong ESG performance and long-term stock returns, though results vary across industries and regions
  • Meta-analyses indicate that the majority of studies find a non-negative (neutral to positive) relationship between ESG and corporate financial performance, with few showing a negative impact