13.3 Leader Emergence

Leadership emergence and influence are crucial aspects of organizational dynamics. Leaders can be formal or informal, with various factors contributing to their rise. Understanding the sources of leadership power and different leadership styles is essential for effective management.

Leadership theories have evolved to include more nuanced approaches. The Path-Goal Theory and Fiedler Contingency Model offer insights into how leaders can adapt their behavior to motivate followers and match their style to situational demands, enhancing overall organizational effectiveness.

Leader Emergence and Influence

Emergence of organizational leaders

Top images from around the web for Emergence of organizational leaders

• 

  Situational Theories of Leadership | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Situational Theories of Leadership | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  What Makes an Effective Leader? | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Situational Theories of Leadership | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Situational Theories of Leadership | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Emergence of organizational leaders

• 

  Situational Theories of Leadership | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Situational Theories of Leadership | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  What Makes an Effective Leader? | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Situational Theories of Leadership | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Situational Theories of Leadership | Principles of Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Formal leaders gain authority through appointment or election to positions in the organizational hierarchy (managers, supervisors, team leads)
• Informal leaders emerge based on their skills, expertise, or personal qualities and gain influence through social interactions and relationships, often respected and followed by peers regardless of formal authority
• Individual characteristics influence leader emergence including intelligence, self-confidence, extroversion, and emotional stability
• Group characteristics such as size, cohesiveness, and task complexity also impact leader emergence
• Situational factors like crises, uncertainty, and time pressure can contribute to the emergence of leaders
• Trait theory suggests that certain inherent personality traits predispose individuals to leadership roles

Sources of leadership power

• Legitimate power stems from a leader's formal position or title, with followers complying due to the leader's perceived right to issue orders
• Reward power is based on a leader's ability to provide incentives, recognition, or favors, motivating followers to comply to receive these benefits
• Coercive power derives from a leader's ability to punish or withhold rewards, causing followers to comply to avoid negative consequences or loss of privileges
• Expert power arises from a leader's knowledge, skills, or experience, earning the respect and adherence of followers who value the leader's expertise
• Referent power is based on a leader's personal charisma, likability, or admirable qualities, inspiring followers to identify with and emulate the leader (charismatic leadership)

Comparison of leadership styles

• Autocratic leadership involves unilateral decision-making by the leader with little input from followers, effective in crises or when quick decisions are needed but may lead to low morale and resistance over time
• Democratic leadership encourages follower participation in decision-making, fostering creativity, engagement, and ownership but may be time-consuming and less effective in urgent situations
• Laissez-faire leadership provides minimal guidance and allows followers to work independently, suitable for highly skilled, self-motivated teams but can result in lack of direction and accountability if not monitored
• Situational leadership adapts style based on followers' readiness and task complexity, using directing for low readiness and high complexity, coaching for moderate readiness and complexity, supporting for high readiness and low complexity, and delegating for high readiness and complexity

Advanced Leadership Theories

• Transformational leadership focuses on inspiring and motivating followers to achieve extraordinary outcomes and develop their own leadership capacity
• Leader-member exchange theory emphasizes the quality of relationships between leaders and individual followers, suggesting that leaders form different types of relationships with various group members
• Social identity theory explains how leaders emerge and maintain influence by embodying and promoting the group's shared identity and values

Leadership Styles and Contingency Theories

Describe the key elements and implications of the Path-Goal Theory

• Path-Goal Theory focuses on how leaders motivate followers to achieve goals by clarifying the path to rewards and removing obstacles
• Leadership behaviors include:
  1. Directive: provides guidance, sets standards, and schedules work
  2. Supportive: shows concern for followers' well-being and creates a friendly environment
  3. Participative: consults with followers and considers their ideas in decision-making
  4. Achievement-oriented: sets challenging goals, emphasizes excellence, and shows confidence in followers
• Follower characteristics impact the effectiveness of leadership behaviors, such as locus of control (internal or external) and experience and ability affecting the level of guidance needed
• Task characteristics like structure (clear procedures vs. ambiguous) and stress (pressure, anxiety, frustration) also influence the appropriate leadership behavior
• Leaders should adapt their behavior to match follower and task characteristics for optimal motivation and performance

Explain the main propositions and applications of the Fiedler Contingency Model

• Fiedler Contingency Model proposes that leader effectiveness depends on the fit between leadership style and situational favorability
• Leadership style is measured by the Least Preferred Coworker (LPC) scale, with low LPC indicating task-orientation and high LPC indicating relationship-orientation
• Situational favorability is determined by three factors:
  1. Leader-member relations: degree of trust, respect, and confidence between leader and followers
  2. Task structure: clarity of goals, procedures, and performance metrics
  3. Position power: level of formal authority and control over rewards and punishments
• Optimal leadership style depends on situational favorability, with low LPC (task-oriented) leaders performing best in highly favorable or unfavorable situations and high LPC (relationship-oriented) leaders performing best in moderately favorable situations
• Applications involve assessing leadership style using the LPC scale, analyzing situational favorability based on the three factors, and matching the leader to the situation or modifying the situation to fit the leader's style