12.1 Curry-Howard isomorphism

The Curry-Howard isomorphism links logic and computation, showing how propositions match types and proofs match programs. This connection lets us use programming concepts in logic and vice versa, leading to cool stuff like proof assistants and better program verification.

Natural deduction in logic lines up nicely with the Curry-Howard isomorphism. It shows how logical rules match up with ways we build and use different types in programming. This idea even works for fancier types that depend on values.

Foundations of Curry-Howard Isomorphism

Correspondence between Propositions and Types

Top images from around the web for Correspondence between Propositions and Types

• 

  Propositional Logic Proof using I.P. or C.P or rules of inference - Mathematics Stack Exchange View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Notes on inductive logic programming View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Intuitionistic logic and Muchnik degrees | Algebra universalis View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Propositional Logic Proof using I.P. or C.P or rules of inference - Mathematics Stack Exchange View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Notes on inductive logic programming View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Correspondence between Propositions and Types

• 

  Propositional Logic Proof using I.P. or C.P or rules of inference - Mathematics Stack Exchange View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Notes on inductive logic programming View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Intuitionistic logic and Muchnik degrees | Algebra universalis View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Propositional Logic Proof using I.P. or C.P or rules of inference - Mathematics Stack Exchange View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Notes on inductive logic programming View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Propositions in logic correspond to types in programming languages
• Proofs of propositions correspond to programs of a given type
• Type theory provides a foundation for this correspondence by treating logical propositions as types and proofs as programs
• Intuitionistic logic, a constructive logic that requires proofs for every true statement, aligns well with the Curry-Howard isomorphism
• Constructive mathematics, which relies on intuitionistic logic, ensures that every proven statement has a corresponding program (witness)

Implications and Applications

• The Curry-Howard isomorphism establishes a deep connection between logic and computation
• Allows for the exchange of ideas and techniques between the two fields
• Enables the use of type systems in programming languages to ensure program correctness
• Provides a basis for developing proof assistants and automated theorem provers
• Offers insights into the nature of computation and its relationship to mathematical reasoning

Logical Systems and Curry-Howard

Natural Deduction and Curry-Howard

• Natural deduction is a logical system that closely mirrors the structure of proofs in intuitionistic logic
• In natural deduction, logical connectives (e.g., implication, conjunction) correspond to type constructors in programming languages
• Introduction and elimination rules for logical connectives in natural deduction correspond to the construction and destruction of values of the corresponding types
• The Curry-Howard isomorphism allows for the interpretation of natural deduction proofs as programs in a typed lambda calculus (simply-typed lambda calculus)

Dependent Types and Curry-Howard

• Dependent types are types that can depend on values, allowing for more expressive type systems
• In a dependently-typed system, types can be parameterized by values, enabling the encoding of complex logical propositions as types
• The Curry-Howard isomorphism extends to dependent types, establishing a correspondence between proofs in higher-order logic and programs in dependently-typed languages (e.g., Coq, Agda)
• Dependent types enable the specification and verification of more complex program properties and mathematical theorems

Category Theory and Curry-Howard

Cartesian Closed Categories and Curry-Howard

• Category theory provides a general framework for studying mathematical structures and their relationships
• Cartesian closed categories (CCCs) are a type of category that models the simply-typed lambda calculus
• In a CCC, objects correspond to types, and morphisms correspond to functions between types
• The Curry-Howard isomorphism can be generalized to the categorical setting, establishing a correspondence between proofs in intuitionistic logic and morphisms in a CCC
• The categorical perspective on Curry-Howard allows for the study of the isomorphism in a more abstract and general setting, enabling its application to various type systems and logics

Functors, Natural Transformations, and Curry-Howard

• Functors are structure-preserving mappings between categories, allowing for the translation of concepts and constructions from one category to another
• In the context of Curry-Howard, functors can be used to map between different type systems or logical frameworks
• Natural transformations are structure-preserving mappings between functors, providing a way to relate and compare different translations between categories
• The interplay between functors, natural transformations, and the Curry-Howard isomorphism allows for the study of relationships between different type systems and logics, enabling the transfer of results and techniques between them