13.4 Logic programming and proof search algorithms
4 min read•august 7, 2024
Logic programming languages like and use declarative approaches to solve complex problems. They rely on , , and inference engines to derive new information and find solutions in areas like AI and optimization.
Inference techniques like and are key to logic programming. These methods, along with search strategies and using , enable efficient problem-solving and reasoning in various applications.
🌻 The Best and Most Current of Modern Natural Language Processing View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Prolog (Programming in Logic) is a declarative logic programming language based on first-order logic
Consists of a set of rules and facts used to define relationships between objects
Programs are written as a set of (facts and rules) that describe the problem domain
Prolog uses a built-in to derive new facts from the given clauses through logical inference
Supports , allowing complex problems to be broken down into smaller, more manageable subproblems
Used in artificial intelligence, natural language processing, and expert systems (medical diagnosis, financial planning)
Answer Set Programming (ASP)
Answer Set Programming (ASP) is a paradigm based on the of logic programming
Represents knowledge using a set of rules and constraints
Programs are written as a set of rules that describe the problem domain and the desired properties of the solution
ASP solvers generate stable models (answer sets) that satisfy the given rules and constraints
Supports , allowing the system to handle incomplete or contradictory information
Used in planning, scheduling, and optimization problems (resource allocation, supply chain management)
Inference Techniques
SLD Resolution
SLD (Selective Linear Definite clause) resolution is an inference rule used in logic programming for deriving new clauses from existing ones
Combines a goal clause with a definite clause (fact or rule) to generate a new goal clause
Applies unification to match the selected literal in the goal clause with the head of the definite clause
Resolves the selected literal with the body of the definite clause, generating a new goal clause
Continues the resolution process until an empty clause is derived, indicating a successful proof, or until no more resolvents can be generated
Unification and Backtracking
Unification is the process of finding a substitution that makes two terms identical
Used in logic programming to match a goal with the head of a clause during resolution
Determines if the goal and the head of the clause can be made identical by substituting variables with terms
If unification succeeds, the substitution is applied to the body of the clause, generating a new goal
is a search technique used in logic programming to explore alternative solutions when a unification or resolution fails
When a goal fails, the system backtracks to the most recent choice point and tries an alternative clause or substitution
Allows the system to systematically explore the search space and find all possible solutions
Search Strategies
Depth-First and Breadth-First Search
(DFS) is a search strategy that explores a branch of the search tree as deeply as possible before backtracking
Implemented using a stack data structure to keep track of the nodes to be visited
Can be more memory-efficient than but may not find the shortest solution path
Breadth-first search (BFS) is a search strategy that explores all the neighboring nodes at the current depth before moving on to the nodes at the next depth level
Implemented using a queue data structure to keep track of the nodes to be visited
Guarantees finding the shortest solution path but may require more memory than depth-first search
Tabling
is a technique used in logic programming to avoid redundant computations and improve efficiency
Memoizes the results of previously computed subgoals and reuses them when the same subgoal is encountered again
Helps avoid infinite loops and redundant computations in recursive programs
Implemented using a table data structure to store the results of previously computed subgoals
Improves the performance of programs with redundant computations and enables the handling of left-recursive rules
Knowledge Representation
Horn Clauses
Horn clauses are a restricted form of first-order logic clauses used in logic programming
Consist of at most one positive literal (the head) and zero or more negative literals (the body)
Can represent facts (clauses with no negative literals), rules (clauses with both positive and negative literals), and goals (clauses with only negative literals)
Provide a simple and efficient way to represent knowledge in logic programming
Enable efficient inference algorithms, such as SLD resolution, to derive new facts from the given clauses
Used to represent domain-specific knowledge in various applications (expert systems, natural language processing, planning)